Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Heinrich Khunrath’s Magnesia Catholica Philosophorum
The 1599 German text with a new English translation, introduction, glossary, and notes.
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
English Introduction · Branch 5 of 215
Introduction · IV. That He Has Not Made It
Heinrich Khunrath’s Magnesia Catholica Philosophorum: Introduction
p. 5iv. That he has not made it
The most startling thing in the treatise is that Khunrath concedes he has never made the Stone, and that the book’s longest sustained argument exists to defend the concession.
The objection is put in direct speech at p. 130, and it is the sharpest thing said against him in the book: Hat doch Doctor Khunrath noch nichts gewisses in der Kunst / wie darff er dann also gewis / von MAGNESIA reden? Er las die jenigen daruon reden / die allbereit transmutiret haben — Doctor Khunrath has as yet nothing certain in the Art; how then does he dare speak so certainly of Magnesia? Let him leave the speaking of it to those who have already transmuted.
The answer runs from p. 129 to p. 137 and is not a claim but a reduction. If certainty came only after success, the first Philosopher of all could never have begun, for he would have had to work through every material in the whole nature of things before finding the one right one, which would have been impossible (pp. 130–131). Bernard of Treviso, who says he knew the Art two years before he completed the Stone, must then have lied grievously — a thing credible with no son of doctrine (pp. 131–133). The author of the Rosarium had seen the Philosophical Work no further than the Lion (p. 134). Bonus of Ferrara confesses he was Operationi & labori … rarò dediti, but seldom given to operation and labour (pp. 134–135). Each of them wrote with authority, and none of them could have done so if the objection held. Then the generalization: true Philosophers knew it, and they knew it either by special divine inspiration, or from a well-knowing human schoolmaster, or out of the Light of Nature by diligent reading, contemplation and observation (pp. 135–136).
At p. 162 he says it outright, and without hedging: Ob Ich schon nimmermer erlebete / das Ich Lapidem Philosophorum vollkömlich daraus præpariren möchte … vnd zur Transmutation Metallorum dadurch jemals gereichte / wolte Ich mir dannoch deswegen keine grawe Hare wachsen lassen — even if I should never live to prepare the Stone perfectly out of it, and never through it came to the transmutation of metals, I would not for that let a grey hair grow on me. He would still keep the recognition of the true Magnesia, and still be and remain a true Philosopher. What is lacking in the preparation, God can give in His own time.
This is the axis of the book. It is why Agnitio, recognition, and not transmutation is what the treatise is for, and why a man may transmute and still know nothing — of which p. 155 gives the converse case, that none of the public tingents ever prepared the Stone a second time, as Bernard did four times in his old age.
Socrates
Reading Heinrich Khunrath’s Magnesia Catholica Philosophorum · Introduction · IV. That He Has Not Made It
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Heinrich Khunrath’s Magnesia Catholica Philosophorum argues that alchemy has one universal subject, that this subject cannot be extracted from the metals, and that nothing in the work can begin without recognizing it. This complete reader begins with the supplied seven-part introduction and orientation, then presents every printed page of the 1599 German treatise opposite its new English translation.
Historical Text and Translation
The German reading text is a fresh diplomatic transcription from 600 dpi images of the Magdeburg copy printed by Johann Bötcher in 1599. It preserves Khunrath’s capitalization, word division, authorial marginal keys, glosses, errata, and three unnumbered closing pages: the errata leaf, owl emblem, and colophon.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared the new English translation, introduction, notes, glossary, collation, and editorial apparatus. The translation follows Khunrath directly, retaining his technical vocabulary, changes of register, repetitions, rhetorical questions, and distinctions between German, Latin, and coined terms.
Rights
Heinrich Khunrath’s 1599 German work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation, introduction, notes, glossary, editorial arrangement, and related matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.