T34. The single displayed verse line and printed ellipsis remain one paragraph. Hut renders cabane without an added smallness adjective. It shares the source’s left inset with the continuation at paragraph 3; no rhyme or external lyric is imported. All eight item 24 blocks are main text and roman; only the separate Liasse 3. group label is italic inside roman parentheses.
T196. In the French source, printed item 24 owns eight separate main-text blocks: verse, parenthetic comment, four-line verse, prose, verse, parenthetic comment, two-line verse, prose. All are roman. The four verse blocks share one indented left edge; they are not separately centered. The two comments are not apparatus. All ellipses are printed. The first line has cabane without a separate smallness adjective; chérie has feminine singular ending without a uniquely resolved referent supplied here. The source comma after unies is retained. Couplet/couplets remains literal. Original-size color and native confirm fraîcheur with circumflex, the conditional on diroit and literal s’asseoit . The two final predicates sit/rest remain distinct. No source word is missing.
T35. The parenthesis, repeated it-is-the-song, hillside/return and ellipsis remain a separate main-text paragraph, not a translator note.
T36. The four source verse lines remain four English lines within one paragraph, at the same left inset as paragraph 1. Repeated evening, future return and more cherished remain. French chérie is feminine singular; its relation to the speaker or the addressed cabane is not settled by agreement alone. English cherished leaves that attachment open rather than naming the referent. English adds a comma at the end of the first line for phrasing and does not invent a rhyme. These roman lines remain separate from the preceding parenthetic comment and following prose.
T37. The two so terms, born/united image, seeming rather than asserted impossibility, memory’s never, may-well and always/every-time remain. Verses contextually renders couplets as song stanzas rather than necessarily two-line couplets. The tune is distinct from its notes, words and sounds. English omits the source comma after unies before que ; present hears idiomatically renders future entendra in the every-time clause. This roman prose is one of the eight main blocks, not an annotation.
T38. The initial With and ellipsis remain one verse line and paragraph, sharing the source inset with paragraph 7. No missing action is supplied.
T39. The parenthetic comment remains a main paragraph. Seems, reflexive singing and both addressees remain; no tune or composer is identified.
T40. Two verse lines remain one paragraph with the same left inset as paragraph 5. The demonstrative trees, inclusive imperative, breathing coolness and ellipsis remain without an invented rhyme.
T41. The completed temporal arrival, conditional one would think and distinct sits-down/rests personification remain. Would think renders on diroit as a hypothetical impression, not a categorical present judgment. The tune is not replaced by a singer. French retains literal s’asseoit . This final roman prose paragraph completes item 24; its preceding verse and parenthetic comments remain separate main blocks.
T42. Both ellipses, first-person completed finding and negative honey image remain. The antecedent of in-it is not supplied.
T197. In the French source, printed item 25 retains both printed three-point ellipses and the complete roman negative sentence. The space after the initial ellipsis is typographic, not a missing lexical slot. Its italic Liasse 23. label does not date the entry.
T43. The completed order, law/sleep personification and one-day duration remain; the historical anecdote is not expanded or externally authenticated. Should sleep renders conditional dormiroient within a past reported order. English Agesilaus gives Agésilas its conventional name; French retains loix . This is the first of two separate roman paragraphs under the italic Verso du même feuillet. relation, which supplies no date or newly identified manuscript.
T198. In the French source, printed item 26 owns two separate roman paragraphs under italic Verso du même feuillet. with its printed relation to item 25; no date is inferred. Literal loix has final x , and Agésilas/Lacédémoniens keep their printed accents. Original-size color and corrective native support the intact final conditional form eût été . The first native final crop began inside the second paragraph; its corrective wider crop includes both full sentences and loix . Both tant constructions and the final counterfactual are retained. No external anecdote or source wording is imported.
T44. The causal cleft, repeated so-much, weight/taste pair and counterfactual remain. It refers contextually to style; no further account of Lacedaemonian institutions is supplied.
T45. The old/new contrast, valiant/valor root echo and often/itself remain. Often killed renders imperfect tuoient , whereas have killed and have suffered render the compound-past ont tué and ont reçu ; the counterfactual could have caused remains distinct. Morals and affairs stay distinct; no modern weapons or specific military event are inserted. French retains vaillants . The body is roman; the separate italic id. relation supplies no date.
T199. In the French source, printed item 27 has the separate italic id. relation and null date. The complete roman paragraph retains imperfect tuoient versus ont tué , literal vaillants and the counterfactual n’eussent pu ; repeated en and the morals/affairs distinction are intact. No source loss.
T46. The imperfect conversation, this evening, must/always, never/always, just/profound and vague/precise contrasts remain. Just is provisional for justes , retaining the open relation between rightness and exactness. The closing April 24 and circumstance remain once in the body, with no year inferred or duplicate date heading. The separate printed label is Liasse ? with an explicit question mark, not a supplied manuscript number or date. French retains aler with one l . The complete quoted remark, embedded date and circumstance are roman; the group label is italic inside roman parentheses.
T200. In the French source, printed item 28 has the literal italic label Liasse ? with a question mark, not the provisional navigation-map numeral 9. Original-size color and native 454 show its distinct upper hook and lower point. No manuscript number is reconstructed. The closing parenthesis contains the complete day 24 avril and circumstance jour de grand chagrin. , with the period inside the close; it is embedded main text, not a new date heading, and gives no year. The complete quotation and literal one-l aler are retained. Disoit is imperfect reporting and the quoted propositions remain present.
T47. The reported prayer, grace, two negative restrictions and agreeable/please relation remain. The prayer is newly translated from this French passage. The external author/title/page are retained without asserting a verified English title or importing a published translation. The whole source reference, including Banquet de Xénophon , is roman, as is its English counterpart. Page 164 remains an external locator, not an identified destination in this notebook; both quotation boundaries are complete.
T201. In the French source, printed item 29 retains the separate italic id. relation and null date. The complete prayer, both negative restrictions and parenthetic Lefebvre/Banquet/page 164 reference are roman. The page is an external locator, not a destination in this notebook. No external source has been substituted or authenticated.
T48. The exclamation, three repeated through phrases naming the arts, self-expression, conditional unrealized ideas and future-always unknown feelings remain. Speech preserves parole rather than silently narrowing it to written work. English capitalizes If after Ah! where French has lowercase si , and supplies a comma before the second how many phrase. The complete body is roman.
T202. In the French source, printed item 30 is one roman paragraph under italic Liasse 8. ; null date. Lowercase si follows Ah! , and all three par phrases, the conditional j’aurois and future seront remain. The final exclamation is intact.
T49. The initial dash/And, completed act, sad tree, permission denied and good men remain. The unidentified his/they/them are not assigned a people, person or myth. French retains literal ciprès . English recasts the relative et dont as a finite coordinated clause, retaining its relation to the tree through final with it. The semicolon remains; the roman body is separate from the italic Même feuillet. relation, which supplies no date.
T203. In the French source, printed item 31 retains the initial dash, Et and semicolon before et dont . Literal ciprès has i , not normalized y . The relative dont connects the tree to shading; no group or antecedent for his/them is invented. Body roman; italic Même feuillet. is a separate relation, not a date.