T64. This single verse line remains one paragraph, with its initial dependent Of and passive relation; no poetic source or surrounding line is invented. It is centered and roman, with its period. The complete September 23 date governs this line and both following prose paragraphs.
T135. The complete September 23 date owns three paragraphs: one centered roman verse line, then two indented prose paragraphs. The verse period remains; in the French source, only prince , and toi are italic in paragraph 2. The attached comma remains in the prince span. Letters O and I , the people parenthesis and all other text are roman. The paragraph-2 ellipses are printed, not image losses. The source has a semicolon after lié before dans , a comma before car , and no added lexical completion at hors de là... . The relative/conditional relations and literal thread/ball image remain. Paragraph 3 crosses directly from figures at the bottom of 914 to the damaged opening on 915. Original-size color and native 447 certify only gulières , with identifiable but abraded initial g ; the preceding ré is not recovered. Only disconnected foreground fragments occupy the slot before the intact perpendiculaire ; no complete la is certified, so a whole loss is retained. The printed roman [soit] is an editorial supplement, distinct from those two reproduction losses. The source plural soient indiqués follows cercle ou la perpendiculaire and is retained without grammatical repair. The final straightness relation, perfect/absolute degrees and ordinary complete wraps remain. No additional paragraph or page-boundary punctuation is inserted.
T65. Eccentric preserves the literal off-center argument rather than merely unusual. The contrasted center and beginning, and their prince/you word-mentions, parenthetic people, thread/ball image, round/tight/bound alternatives and unfinished final clause remain. Prince/you are word-mentions corresponding to italic prince/toi . Elevated provisionally renders soutenu in style; the ellipses mark source fragments, not reproduction loss. The exact italic counterparts are “prince,” through its comma and “you” alone; all other text is roman. English replaces the source semicolon after lié with a comma and supplies a comma before or well bound. The final printed ellipsis remains unfinished, without a supplied consequence.
T66. Both letters, circle/perpendicular alternatives, enough versus must, regular/mathematical, perfect/absolutely straight remain. [Regular] is a broad contextual rendering of […]gulières , whose missing opening ré is not recovered in French. The later [the] contextually renders the whole lost slot before perpendiculaire without certifying la . These English reconstruction brackets are distinct from [be], which corresponds to the printed roman source-editor supplement [soit] on 915. English for the circle or the perpendicular to be indicated recasts the source finite plural soient indiqués as an infinitive; it does not reproduce that number agreement. Letters O and I are roman. One paragraph crosses the source page boundary; neither the losses nor the supplement creates a new paragraph.
T67. The Latin is translated freshly: the shared has-deemed-worthy predicate governs god/table and goddess/bed, with the demonstrative this one unassigned. His/her clarify the respective possessive relations without inventing a named deity. A direct Latin reading of Eclogue IV.51–63 supports the deponent perfect dignata est in line 63. No external English Virgil translation is used, and the omitted context is not inserted. The September day is wholly unresolved; no digit or digit count is supplied. French retains mensâ with a qualified circumflex contour. The entire fresh English line through its period is italic; the parenthetic attribution is roman.
T68. The three point occurrences, nominal topic, sword image, everything and final exclamation remain. English gives the wordplay a shared point rather than replacing the first occurrence with essence. The third [point] contextually renders […]ointe , and [the] renders […]e before pommeau ; neither certifies the missing p or l . The first two intact pointe counterparts remain unbracketed. English supplies the comma before etc. The two dashes and final exclamation remain. Only the qualified terminal 0 of the September day survives; no preceding digit is supplied.
T69. The separate fragments, at-once pair, seemed/as-if, struck image, eternal and final dismissal remain. The third fragment’s opening quotation is not certified in the worn source and none is supplied. English moves the first two printed commas inside their closing marks. [And] contextually renders […]t without recovering the missing E in French. All four printed ellipses remain distinct from that lexical reproduction loss. Only the qualified terminal 4 of the September day is retained. All text is roman; no external poem or published English rendering is used.
T138. Only the qualified terminal 4 is identifiable by its right stem and crossbar; no complete preceding digit is recovered. In the French source, the first two fragment quotations have closing marks followed by commas. The third begins with printed ellipsis; no complete opening guillemet is certified at its worn left boundary, and none is supplied. Its closing guillemet and the roman Lamartine parenthesis remain. The final line retains t but no complete preceding E , so […]t remains. All four three-point groups are printed ellipses rather than lexical loss markers; all text is roman.
T70. Plural spaces, first-person future, almost and unfinished degree clause remain. English supplies the comma before etc.; no adjective completing existence is invented. The June day is wholly unresolved and remains after the September entries in physical source order. Plain dirai remains future; both ellipses are printed, not reproduction losses.
T139. The day is wholly lost; juin is complete and remains after the September entries without chronological repair. Espaces has a complete foreground E despite detached margin noise. Both ellipses are printed, and the degree clause remains unfinished before etc. No comma or missing predicate is supplied in the French transcription; all text is roman.
T71. Yes, can, all, self-crowning, rose and forced flowering remain. The second quotation stays incomplete rather than being supplied with an object. [Its] contextually renders […]a before queuë without certifying the missing s . English supplies the comma inside the first quotation’s closing mark: no following source comma is printed there. It also supplies the prose commas around the first etc. French retains queuë with qualified paired upper e marks. Only the surviving terminal 7 of the May day is retained, without an inferred preceding digit. Both quotations and the surrounding text are roman.
T140. The complete terminal 7 survives, but the disconnected preceding contour does not certify another digit. Mai remains after juin in source order. The next-line opening retains a , with no complete preceding s . That loss remains explicit. Original-size color/native supports the two upper e components in queuë ; the baseline wording and both quotations are roman. There is no source comma after the first quotation or before/after the first etc. ; the second quotation contains printed ellipsis, not a recovered object.