T39. The French word-mentions résulter , ressaillir , Résultat , résulte and ressault remain where their visible forms carry the proposed etymology; the surrounding predicates are translated. Résulter means to result, ressaillir to spring or leap back, and quasi roughly as if. This preserves Joubert’s association without presenting it as a verified derivation. The five exact italic counterparts are “résulter ,”, “ressaillir .”, “Résultat ,”, “résulte ,” and “ressault .”, including their punctuation. Quasi , the explanations and final Ressaillir or to leap again remain roman. French retains its literal double-s forms ressaillir/ressailli/ressault/ressauter , with capital italic Résultat distinct from final roman Ressaillir . The complete ordinary wraps do not create lexical gaps; June 3 is complete.
T40. The quotation, very-well approval, merely/also and two distinct activities remain. The historical source is not authenticated or replaced by an external translation; English uses Mr. for the abbreviated French title. [He] is a broad contextual reading of […]l ; the visible l remains and the missing initial i is not recovered in French. The first June day is wholly unresolved. The source title has baseline M with raised r ; ordinary English Mr. is a conventional counterpart, not identical typography. The period is already inside the source quotation.
T118. Only a narrow right-hand digit remnant remains before juin ; neither a complete digit nor the number of lost digits is certified. The day stays wholly unknown. The title has baseline M and a smaller raised r in color/native. The next-line opening retains l , but no complete preceding i is visible in the original-size color/native strip. That loss remains explicit rather than silently supplying il . The semicolon, seulement/aussi contrast and period inside the closing guillemet remain; all text is roman.
T41. The nested attribution and comparison remain. Phrasing provisionally takes phrase as manner of expression rather than one specified sentence; no example is invented. Erolien preserves the qualified canonical reading of an uncrossed l -like fourth glyph, without selecting the expected Erotien or identifying the intended historical person. The unmatched closing quotation is retained without an opening mark being supplied. The complete parenthetic title/reference is roman and translated as given, without claiming an existing English edition; book/page/year stay source reference data, not notebook dates. June 15 is the qualified complete date, with no additional digit inferred.
T119. The date is qualified complete 15: the first narrow stem/upper flag and the second upper horizontal/descending curved form are identifiable in original-size color/native, despite abrasion. No preceding digit is inferred. The literal name is conservatively read Erolien: the fourth glyph has a tall uncrossed l -like stem, unlike the nearby t in dit . No expected Erotien is silently substituted. This is a qualified printed-glyph reading, not a claim about the intended historical person. The closing guillemet after the period is visible, without an opening guillemet before Erolien. The entire bibliographic parenthesis, title included, is roman; lib. 3, pag. 241. and 1729 remain reference data, not main dates. The left starts même and 1729 retain identifiable contours without additional gaps.
T42. The repeated seems-to-say, opposed commands and contrasting effects remain. Inspires despair gives désespérante its causative force, not a claim that criticism itself feels despair. English supplies the comma at the end of the first quoted exhortation and places it inside the closing mark. The second quotation’s period is already inside its source closing mark and remains there. June 20 is complete.
T43. Essential, never-without, together, the three dependent that clauses, no-other and by-this-very-fact remain. The second nominal/dependent construction is not supplied with a main predicate. Binds so closely renders si liante and retains the social binding image.
T121. Two separately indented paragraphs remain in one undated unit. Literal ce temps là , joye , and the non-main-predicate Et cette joye... construction remain. All three relative clauses, never/without relation and together remain roman. The coffee attribution visibly prints Delile (D-e-l-i-l-e ), confirmed by a tight original-size color and native 445 comparison. Caffé has double f . No extra l is supplied from a conventional name spelling. The final coffee quotation period is inside its closing guillemet. The objectless concentrent and adjectival expansif remain literal.
T44. The contrast of concentration and expansiveness remains in its compact, objectless form. The drinking of wine contextually supplies boisson from Celle du vin without changing the liquid into a person. Delile follows the literal witness spelling, with one l before and one after i ; French caffé retains double f . The quoted coffee claim and very-well attribution remain unverified; its period is already inside the source closing mark. Said preserves the citation’s past attribution without adding a habitual emphasis.
T45. The exclamation, late timing, future negative and error/escape-from-error relation remain. No specific age or particular mistake is supplied. The complete July 1 source date has raised er after the numeral; the English date does not imitate that French ordinal typography.
T46. The Latin is translated freshly with its opening ellipsis and attribution. In Georgics II.483–484, the line belongs to a prospective conditional beginning with sin . Should bar gives that contextual conditional force in English; it does not reproduce the Latin’s perfect morphology or supply the omitted governing line. Heart contextually renders præcordia . The physiological image remains historical source language, without an added medical assertion. The entire fresh English line, from the printed opening ellipsis through its period, is italic; the parenthetic attribution remains roman. The ellipsis is printed, not a reproduction loss. No omitted governing sin clause is inserted.
T123. The first paragraph has a printed opening ellipsis, not a reproduction gap. The Latin through its terminal period is italic, with the parenthetic attribution roman. Literal obstiterit and æ in præcordia remain; no preceding governing line is supplied from an external witness. The second paragraph is separately indented. In the French source, only calidus, is italic, including its comma; all French explanation remains roman. Conditional diroit and imperfect attribuoient stay distinct; the repeated temperature terms are not modernized.
T47. Hot freshly translates the Latin word-mention calidus and contrasts with the preceding frigidus . Present hypothetical versus ancient past, repeated attribution and final change in temperature remain; no modern physiology is substituted. Only “hot,” is italic through its comma, corresponding to “calidus, ”; the rest of this separate paragraph is roman.
T48. The opening And, perhaps, conditional and source scalar phrase pas un conseil peu important remain. A piece of advice of little importance preserves peu rather than compressing it to unimportant. The colon/dash, imperative and never/anything negative remain. Great pleasure is not reduced to liking the finished result. July 4 retains the qualified complete digit without an inferred prefix.
T124. The single 4 is qualified but identifiable by its diagonal/right stem and crossbar; the softened left edge does not establish an additional preceding digit. The opening Et , peut-être , conditional, double negative, colon/dash and final imperative remain. Every wrapped/start/end word is complete and roman.
T49. The superlative, comparative choice, opaque lowercase v. and separate endorsement remain. The source play reference stays literal and external; no identity, bibliographical repair or verified link is supplied. The quoted period is already inside its source closing mark. French retains literal rejetter , and the complete expri-/mer wrap introduces no lexical gap. The whole reference is roman: source Roman IV remains Roman, while Arabic 1 with raised re is rendered ordinary scene 1 without treating the ordinal as an apparatus call. July 10 is complete.
T50. The essential state/process distinction and nominal rule remain. The fragment is not expanded into a prescription about a specific art.
T126. The complete 17 and nominal state/process contrast remain, with both periods. No specific art is inferred; all text is roman.