All this world, when the hand of God weighs it, what weight has it? When the gaze of God embraces it, what extent has it? When he sees it, what does he think of it? And when he penetrates it, what does he find there? That is the question.
But this vapor was necessary to contain this breath within itself; this shadow, to surround the ray and give it a kind of case; these appearances, to give us merit or demerit through the employment of our affections and the good or bad use of our loves: what causes them does not matter, but what they are does matter.
On the question of the void. When one body displaces another, the latter yields its place and displaces another in turn, and so on successively. But the last body displaced, where does it withdraw? Into immateriality, or the region where it displaces nothing more. I used to say to myself, if one stretched out one’s arm at the edge of the material world, where would one’s hand be? In God. Ah! We are there: in him we live, are moved ( moremur! ) and are.
We are moved. Everything advances or draws back in his immaterial immensity, where everything is contained. And the edges of the world continually receive some new cutout.
October 24 ( D. G. )
In chapter 2, after the verse “Truth... and virtue...” add:
Wisdom is repose in light. But it is light itself that, through the calm it inspires and brings, sometimes urges the wise man to play in its rays.
And, after this one, the verse: “There is nothing beautiful but God...”
And after the verse: “Touched and pressed by bodies...” and before: “The whole world...” this must be added:
I was right to say: “Matter is an appearance, everything is little and nothing is much. For what is the whole world?” I have thought about it. I believe it and almost see it. I make up my mind and shall say it boldly. For I have proofs of it without number ([instead of:] perhaps I shall prove it) and Newton thought so. I say it, then: The whole world, etc.
After the verse at the end: “O truth...” these words must be added: “I am going to prove” and end there.
And in the verse “Thus then...” of Chapter V, it must begin this way: “Thus then [we] do not love and we cannot all love, etc.”
T63. All four questions, repeated when, bodily hand/gaze and final singular question remain. He and his acts refer to God; it remains the world. English capitalizes the questions after question marks. French retains literal sous-pèse , a-t’il and trouve-t’il , together with étenduë and its qualified paired upper e marks. No reproduction gap is inferred from the identifiable worn starts.
T64. The opening But, vapor/breath and shadow/ray distinctions, protective case image, merit/demerit and good/bad alternatives remain. Final them/they contextually take loves, the nearest plural masculine amours ; the preceding affections remain part of the wider sense. Necessary is not weakened into merely useful.
T135. The three parallel demonstrative phrases, two semicolons, colon, negative/positive final contrast and plural ils/quels remain. The full word starts and endings are readable despite left-margin ghosting; no extra word or antecedent is supplied. Les/ils may be read in relation to the final amours contextually, but the French is left literal and no referent is newly named. All text is roman.
T65. The displacement chain, last body, former self-questioning and repeated place relation remain. The Latin is freshly translated: are moved follows passive movemur , without importing published Bible wording. The parenthetic moremur! is the qualified literal canonical reading; it remains untranslated and is not silently emended to movemur or another verb. The complete Lewis and Short entry for the first-conjugation deponent moror supplies the senses remain and linger. Grammatically, moremur can be its first-person plural present subjunctive, permitting an exhortative gloss such as “let us linger!” This is a possible analysis, not an identification of Joubert’s intended force or an explanation of the parenthesis. The earlier unsuccessful lexical request is superseded by this completed control; the separate biblical passage remains externally unauthenticated. Are preserves final sumus rather than supplying a new noun. French retains vuide and spaced retire t’il . The three italic English spans are “in him we live, are moved”; retained “moremur! ”; and “and are.” They correspond to “in ipso vivimus, movemur ”; “moremur! ”; and “et sumus. ” The exclamation mark and final period belong to their respective italic spans. The comma within the first span is italic, while both intervening parentheses are roman.
T136. Literal vuide , spaced retire t’il , lower-case dans after the question, former imperfect disois and conditional auroit remain. Both complete immen-/sité and perpétuel-/lement wraps are joined without new gaps. The Latin reads in ipso vivimus, movemur (moremur!) et sumus. The anomalous moremur! is directly visible in original-size color/native 439 and is not emended or replaced with a conjectural translation. The three Latin text spans are italic, including their comma/exclamation/final period; the intervening parentheses are roman. The next French paragraph’s Movemur. is italic through its period. The worn left starts remain identifiable in color, including vivimus and the complete repeated Movemur. No external Latin text has been substituted for the printed sequence.
T66. We are moved freshly translates repeated Movemur . The two opposed motions, repeated everything, immaterial immensity and indefinite some remain. Cutout contextually preserves the material cutting image of découpure rather than reducing it to change; no particular shape or completed period dictionary control is asserted. The opening words We are moved and their period correspond to italic Movemur and its period; the remaining paragraph is roman.
T67. Chapter and verse cues are Joubert’s manuscript instructions within the body, not instructions for this edition or certified internal links. The quoted fragments and final colon remain; verset is rendered verse in this manuscript context. The complete October 24 date governs all seven paragraphs of this owner. Its parenthetic D. G. remains an opaque circumstance on the date line, without expansion, a separate body paragraph or an additional period after the closing parenthesis.
T137. The complete 24 and month are followed by opaque parenthetic D. G. on the date line, without an extra terminal period. That date governs all seven paragraphs; its code is not expanded and no date is inserted into the body. The seven indented paragraphs remain a single source-body revision instruction. Chapter 2 and Chapitre V , verset , both after/before placements and all quoted incipits remain; they are not promoted into headings, apparatus or authenticated internal links. The final Le monde entier, etc. in paragraph 5 is an unquoted reprise, unlike the earlier closed question quotation. Printed [au lieu de :] and [nous] are roman editorial supplements. All ellipses are printed, not reproduction losses. Paragraph 5’s question mark and paragraph 7’s final period are already inside their respective closing guillemets; no mark is invented at those boundaries. Literal jouër has paired e -dots visible in color/native 439; ainsy keeps y , while later ainsi retains i . The complete hardi-/ment , prou-/verai and com-/mencer wraps are joined. The fragile left starts remain identifiable in color/native; no extra losses are certified. All body text is roman.
T68. Repose, light itself, the two past-participle notions inspires/brings, sometimes, and playing in rays remain. English supplies the repeated subject it for the compact calme inspiré, apporté without choosing only one of the two actions. The English and coordinates the two source modifiers of calm; it is an explanatory grammatical link, not a recovered French word. French jouër retains its qualified paired upper e marks; no new reproduction loss is claimed.
T69. The opening And, this one, verse label, exclusive but and incomplete quotation remain. No missing continuation or verified destination is supplied.
T70. The two placements after/before, both quoted incipits, passive touched/pressed and necessity remain as source-body instructions.
T71. The first-person sequence, distinction between believing and almost seeing, both future forms shall say/shall prove and countless proofs remain. Printed [au lieu de :] becomes [instead of:] within the original parenthesis; this is a roman source-editor intervention, not a reproduction gap. The initial quoted passage ends with a complete question, whose question mark is already inside the French closing guillemet and stays there in English. The final The whole world, etc. is an unquoted abbreviated reprise, not a second quotation. Newton’s supposed view is not externally authenticated. French retains literal ainsy here, distinct from later ainsi .
T72. Both quoted fragments and the instruction to end remain in Joubert’s body. No object of prove is supplied.
T73. Printed [nous] becomes roman [we]. The incomplete first negative formulation and second cannot-all formulation remain without supplying an object; tous is not converted into all things. Chapter V remains an unverified manuscript reference within the seven-paragraph body instruction. The final period of etc. already precedes the French closing guillemet, and English retains that position rather than moving the mark.