S6. Source editor’s annotation Only in the notebook of the second version.
T97. Both Of fragments, the second capital Of and two adverbs remain. Brain remains bodily rather than being uniformly replaced by mind.
T105. This qualification belongs to the first paragraph about small brains; it is not merged with the next note’s different notebook.
S7. Source editor’s annotation Only in the notebook of the first version.
T98. The nominal opening, And, repeated brain, mind contrast and concluding explanation remain. The printed closing quotation is retained without an invented opening quotation.
T106. This qualification belongs to the second paragraph about peoples and ages, preserving the editor’s distinction between the two notebooks.
S8. Source editor’s annotation First version: “The Hebrews never had all the vices: the Bible would have reproached them for them... But not practices against nature nor voluntary shedding.
T99. The absolutes, body/mind contrast, two qualified appearances, paired negatives and source’s evaluative wording remain as Joubert’s historical assertion. No claim of independent scriptural verification or modern endorsement is added. Seed and hands retain the source’s indirect bodily language.
T107. The conditional perfect, printed ellipsis and unfinished negative fragment remain. Shedding retains the indirect expression without supplying seed from the main paragraph. The visible quotation is unclosed; no closing mark is silently supplied.
T346. This separately divided unit is undated. The never/all partial negative, seulement , body/mind distinction, both qualified appearances and double ni remain. Paroît has a peaked upper mark at the qualified color level. Plain capital E in Ecriture and baseline St-Paul with its hyphen remain literal. Raised 8 follows gentils before the period. The source specialist’s facsimile collation records the three complete dates, upper marks, doubled b , roman/italic extents, printed [lus] , missing quotation closes and eight calls, with all stated individual reading qualifications retained.
T347. This roman quoted version retains the colon, capital La , circumflex in eût , literal three-dot ellipsis and final negative fragment. A period follows volontaire without a closing guillemet; no closing mark or omitted noun is supplied.
S1. Source editor’s annotation First version: “Dissertation on the dwellings of the ancient Hebrews. Page 310, volume I. The opinion that […] the best.”
T108. The exclamatory opening, thousandfold multiplicity, bounded inner quotation and corrective parenthesis remain. The unmatched final closing quotation is retained without inventing an opening mate; English moves the final period inside it. No separate assertion by the translator is added.
T117. The title-like opening and precise page/volume remain, without identifying an external edition. The printed omission stays unfilled, and the wording is not replaced by a recovered quotation.
T349. One roman quoted version preserves the title-like opening, Page 310, Roman I and printed [...] omission. In the French source, the point precedes the closing guillemet. No external book is identified or silently substituted.
S2. Source editor’s annotation First version: “One can very well Hebraize without Hebrew, Hellenize without the Greek language, judge a painting from a print without having seen its colors. The pleasure in it is diminished; but its nature, arrangement and character are not changed.”
T109. Both verbs, repeated very well, first-person clarification and imagine/even imitate gradation remain. The final but-not-without distinguishes knowing the language from knowing the writers, without adding a particular translation or work.
T118. The three linked actions, without conditions and print/color analogy remain. The diminished pleasure is distinct from the three unchanged qualities, and the main version is not substituted for this one.
S3. Source editor’s annotation First version: “We know no foreign book except through translation, either the one we make of it ourselves when we possess its language, or through another’s translation when we cannot read or understand the original.”
T110. The universal all, restrictive only, some and two alternatives remain. Ourselves retains the emphatic reflexive, and the claim is not narrowed to published translations.
T119. The negative restriction, emphatic ourselves, possess-language condition and read/understand alternative remain. The grammatical change from the one to through another’s follows the variant’s uneven coordination.
T352. The universal and restrictive forms, quelque , both soit alternatives and repeated nous remain. Literal fesons and singular même without a hyphen are not normalized. The peu-/vent wrap is complete. Raised 3 follows même before the period.
T353. One roman quoted version literally reads connaissons and faisons with ai , unlike the main text’s historical forms; color/native 409 confirm the letters. Singular même and the uneven soit/ou par coordination remain. The possé-/dons wrap is complete and the period precedes the closing guillemet.
S4. Source editor’s annotation Only in the notebook of the first version.
T111. The conditional perfect, both adverbs, thirty and forty rather than an exact new count, diminutive little and four possessive terms remain. The printed closing quotation has no supplied opening partner; English moves the period inside it. This is Joubert’s judgment, without an added biographical verification.
T120. The editor’s limited notebook statement remains separate from the Voltaire assertion.
T355. This one roman editorial sentence limits the main Voltaire paragraph to the first-version notebook; it does not create a date or verify an autograph.
S5. Source editor’s annotation Same.
T112. The leading dash and affirmative/negative contrast remain. No antecedent is invented for That. The source has no final baseline period after its note call; none is supplied.
T121. Id. repeats the preceding source annotation’s notebook limitation; its target is source note 4, not the previous main paragraph. Same and its period carry the corresponding italic scope.
T357. In the French source, the complete Id. including its period is italic in color/native 409 and refers to the preceding source annotation’s notebook limitation.