S5. Source editor’s annotation First version: “September 1 and 2nt. Nothing is better suited […] of the passions than assigning them this […] odious origin.”
T84. The topic fragment, question, comparative suitability, repeated demonstratives and parenthetical lowercase devil remain. Principle retains the causal sense rather than becoming a moral rule. Villeneuve stays in the date circumstance.
T90. The printed omissions, demonstrative and variant odious are not completed from the main text. The opaque baseline 2nt. is confirmed in the facsimiles and retained without inventing an expansion, date or time.
T329. The complete 14 septembre retains the date-line parenthesis (A Villeneuve.) . Native/color show plain roman A , italic Villeneuve. and roman parentheses; no accent is supplied on A . The circumstance remains on the date line, not in the main body. The topic capital Diable and parenthetic lowercase diable , literal Y a t’il spacing/apostrophe, comparative question and repeated ce/cette remain roman. Raised 5 follows origine before the question mark.
T330. The variant has baseline 1 with raised er , followed by septembre et 2nt .; native/color confirm baseline 2nt with its period, without identifying an expansion or a second complete date. Both bracketed ellipses are printed source-editor omissions. The demonstrative ce before the second omission is not grammatically repaired. All text is roman.
S6. Source editor’s annotation First version: “Not only eternal pains, but, what is more horrible, an […]”
T85. The nominal construction, not-only/but, repeated eternal and stark parenthetical conditional remain. The source editor’s alternative wording stays separate. The source’s separate period after the exclamation is retained; its source-note call belongs between those marks.
T91. Pains differs from the main torments. The evaluative insertion and final article before a printed omission remain, without filling the omitted noun from the main passage.
T331. The complete 15 septembre , nominal not-only/mais construction, repeated eternal adjective and parenthetic conditional remain. Color/native 407 show exclamation, raised 6 and a separate baseline period after perversité ; the call belongs after perversité! and before the period. The source specialist’s facsimile collation records the six dates, qualified margin contours, Latin/label/date typography, baseline 2nt and six call positions, with all stated individual reading qualifications retained.
T332. This roman first version retains douleurs rather than main tourmens , the more-horrible clause and final feminine une before the printed source-editor omission. No noun or terminal period is supplied inside the quotation.
S1. Source editor’s annotation First version: “Truth (in the high sense). Truths that make us better or worse, and not more or less learned; truths of effect and not truths of fact.”
T92. The three fragments, high/transcendent distinction and thousandfold comparison remain. Truths of effect preserves the unusual wording; the separate first version specifies making us better or worse, without that explanation being inserted into the main text.
T100. The parenthesis, moral contrast, two comparative alternatives and repeated effect/fact distinction remain in the source variant.
T333. The complete 17 septembre and three nominal sentences remain. Subbordonnées literally has double b , visible in color/native 408. The ou colon, three listed qualities, thousandfold degree and effect/facts distinction remain; no predicate is added. Raised 1 follows faits before the period.
T334. One roman quoted version preserves its parenthesis, two comparative alternatives, two non pas clauses, historical scavans and singular fait in the final phrase.
S2. Source editor’s annotation Only in the notebook of the first version.
T93. The infinitive memorandum, colon and restrictive negative remain. The son is not independently identified and the undated status is not filled from the preceding entry.
T101. The editor’s limitation is retained without adding an autograph verification or removing the printed main entry.
T335. This separately divided infinitive unit is undated; no preceding date is inherited. The colon after que , both belle/bonne and restrictive ne…que remain. The right-edge qui is complete despite fold shading. Raised 2 follows multitude before the period.
T336. This roman editorial limitation remains attached to the infinitive son unit without an inferred main date or claim of autograph inspection.
S3. Source editor’s annotation Same.
T94. The two fragments, opening And and of, and alternative stirring/fermentation retain the physical metaphor. Them refers to the dregs, corresponding to singular feminine la in French.
T102. Id. repeats the preceding source annotation’s first-version notebook limitation, not the preceding main entry. Same is its contextual rendering; the structural target is the preceding source note. Same and its period correspond to the source’s italic Id.
T337. This separately divided unit is undated. Remuë has two distinct upper e components in color, compressed into a partly joined pair in native 408; the qualified diaeresis remains. Both feminine la forms refer grammatically to singular lie ; the fragments and alternative ou remain. Raised 3 follows fermenter before the period.
S4. Source editor’s annotation First version: “And true poems, whether dramatic or epic, what else are they but the dreams of a wakeful man (or rather of a wakeful soul). For man dreams particularly when he sleeps, and the soul chiefly when it is awake.”
T95. The opening And, parenthesis, question and paradoxical wakeful dreams remain. Poems renders plural poësies without changing the singular wise man to the variant’s soul.
T103. The variant’s true rather than beautiful, either/or, rhetorical question ending in a printed period, corrective parenthesis and contrasting sleep/waking remain. Particularly and chiefly distinguish the source’s overlapping adverbs particulièrement and principalement .
T339. The complete 27 septembre , opening Et and two clauses remain. Poësies has two upper e components. Literal singular épique precedes plural dramatiques and lyriques ; no agreement normalization is made in French. The sont-elles lexical hyphen remains across the line wrap. Raised 4 follows éveillé before the period.
S5. Source editor’s annotation First version: “[…] imaginable evil. The Gospel is for the perfect; it is the book of innocence. The first of these books […] of the living. Depending on which of the two books is more read in a nation, they nourish different religious morals there.
T96. The dependent That, repeated good and evil, seems qualifications and reversed latter/other references remain: latter here is Gospel, other is Bible. Both Latin phrases receive fresh English glosses, without borrowing a biblical translation; plural heavens follows the Latin genitive. The source editor’s supplied [lus] has the corresponding [read]. The semicolon between earth and other is English punctuation. This preserves Joubert’s distinction without imposing a modern definition of Bible. English uses singular agreement with one or the other where the source literally prints plural sont ; the French grammatical anomaly is retained.
T104. Both printed omissions remain; imaginable differs from possible and the perfect from the predestined. The surviving Latin viventium receives the fresh gloss of the living; the lost phrase is not reconstructed. They follows the variant’s plural ils without silently assigning the nourishment to only one book. The quotation remains unclosed after the terminal period, as printed; no closing mark is supplied. English uses ordinary singular agreement for the source’s l’un ou l’autre livre sont .
T341. The undated paragraph retains dependent Qu’elle , repeated good/evil and tout , both semble predicates, the first/other and celui-ci relations, literal parle t’il spacing/apostrophe and restrictive ne…que . Plain capital E in Evangile is retained. All prédestinés /viventium wrap letters and right-edge words are complete. In the French source, only regnum cœlorum; and in terra viventium. are italic, including their adjacent semicolon and period. The intervening et and prose are roman. Cœlorum retains its visible ligature. The brackets in [lus] are printed source-editor supply, not a reproduction loss. The French plural sont after l’un ou l’autre is literal and not grammatically repaired. Raised 5 follows religieuses before the period.