T66. The two persons, him and contrasting roles remain in the single verse paragraph. As a father preserves the compressed relation of en père without identifying a speaker, subject or external literary source.
S7. Source editor’s annotation First version: “July 2, 1918. […] complete gives roundness to the line of verse, whatever it may be; sense then straightens the sentence.” And (cf. May 1818): “The age abounds in superfluous ideas, and lacks the ideas that are necessary and could suffice for everything.”
T67. The complete sense, roundness, concessive whatever and repeated sense remain. Swells preserves renfle rather than replacing the bodily or spatial image with a claim about eloquence. This prose is separate from the preceding centered verse but belongs to the same entry.
T75. The literal 1918 is confirmed in color and native facsimiles and retained rather than corrected from the surrounding 1818 section. It is an internal variant date, not the main July 10 heading. The printed omission, conditional could, everything and the second distinct quotation remain. Straightens differs from the main swells and is not normalized to it. Cf. remains an unassigned reference rather than an invented link. The second and preserves the printed et before qui .
T318. Original-size color 874 and native 406 support the literal four digits 1918; this anomalous internal variant year is not normalized to 1818 or promoted to a main date. The later cf. mai 1818 is separately printed and remains an unassigned reference. The single bracketed ellipsis is a printed source-editor omission. Both quotations, the semicolon, redresse rather than main renfle , literal superfluës with paired upper e components, and the second et before qui remain. All text is roman.
S8. Source editor’s annotation First version: “False light and true light and Of the badly lit object.”
T68. All four fragments, two And terms, Or, paired badly terms and the conspicuous capital Of remain. False light keeps the optical image and possible figurative sense without reducing it to false information.
T76. The two and links and capital Of retain the variant’s distinct formulation. The main badly placed alternative is not imported.
T319. The complete 15 juillet , four short fragments, two Et openings, conspicuous Du capital and two ou forms remain. Raised 8 follows vrai before the final period; all text is roman. The source specialist’s facsimile collation records the six complete dates and seven calls, verse/prose ownership and apparatus year 1918, with all stated individual reading qualifications retained.
T77. This fresh rendering keeps the four exclamatory infinitives and the difficult reflexive dative sibi . The printed attribution is retained without claiming an independently located Augustinian text. The following French rendering remains a distinct paragraph, with its different wording.
T321. The complete 25 juillet is supported by color/native 407 despite soft left contours. Two separately indented paragraphs remain: the entire Latin invocation through its last exclamation is italic, while the parenthetic attribution and following French paragraph are roman. In the French source, initial O is plain in each paragraph; the three following ô have visible upper circumflex contours. No external Augustinian text substitutes for this wording. The wrapped Augustin is complete. Native/color both show exclamation, raised 1 and a separate baseline period after Dieu ; the call therefore belongs after Dieu! and before the period. The Latin infinitives and the French nominal rendering remain separate and are not harmonized.
S1. Source editor’s annotation First version, the same.
T78. The four nominal exclamations follow the printed French, including eagerness, distancing and bosom, rather than being made identical to the Latin paragraph. The source annotation belongs here. The source’s separate period after the exclamation is retained; its source-note call belongs between those marks.
T86. The editor’s short comparison is retained as a separate annotation, not expanded into another copy of the text.
T322. This brief roman source-editor comparison belongs to the French rendering in paragraph 2, not the preceding Latin.
T79. The rather correction, deliberate reversal of faux style/style faux and four vocal terms remain. The French term haute-contre is retained as a technical register designation without silently equating it with a modern countertenor. The musical analogy is not reduced to dishonesty.
T323. The complete 24 août retains identifying contours in color, with native abrasion on 2 disclosed. Three separately indented roman paragraphs share this date. The short second paragraph is not a heading. The literal unaccented secretement is retained. The lexical haute-contre hyphen is retained across its wrap. Left starts faux/contre/d’esprit/but/une/On/faux remain identifiable in color despite ghost print and native damage. All repeated faux/style/esprit , the four vocal terms, two non pas clauses, one/hundred/thousand counts and final negative remain. Raised 2 belongs after sincère in paragraph 3 before the period.
T80. This nominal pair is a separate paragraph within the same entry, not a new title or dated entry.
S2. Source editor’s annotation First version: “A man has a false mind when he has made a habit of thinking with his brain and not with his soul. Thus the head voice (which does not come from the chest) has something false about it. Poverty of mind is therefore a constant bad disposition, either acquired or natural, and not one or several bad acts. One can be mistaken once, a hundred times, a thousand times, and have a true mind. The false mind is without good faith. The true mind is not infallible, but sincere. Reasoning: a kind of machine or mechanism that produces only a mechanical conviction. When one reasons about the meaning of words, one applies the instrument in a suitable, useful, effective way; otherwise not.”
T81. The repeated falseness, mind, opinion and aim, literal to-the-left direction, disposition/acts distinction and mounting three counts remain. The final one refers to mind; sincerely making an error is not equated with the disposition criticized here.
T87. The variant’s poverty of mind, acquired/natural distinction, true/false contrast and machine/mechanism/mechanical sequence remain. All three counts and three final qualities are kept. A semicolon separates the final elliptical negative in English. The long variant remains one annotation.
T324. One long roman quoted version remains a single annotation. The head/chest parenthesis, poverty rather than falseness, both soit alternatives, all three counts, bad acts, true/false distinction, restriction ne…que and final three qualities plus non autrement remain. Méchanique retains ch . All wrapped words and left starts remain identifiable in color.
S3. Source editor’s annotation First version: “September 17. Our minds […] point. One must […] foundations.”
T82. The opening need, contrast, negative bases and all preserve the architectural or geometrical image. The variant’s September 17 is not substituted for the main date.
T88. The internal September 17 and both printed omissions remain. The main September 1 is not changed to this date; omitted grammar is not reconstructed from the main passage.
T325. The complete 1 and separate raised er are visible in color/native. Literal fondemens and bazes retain their spelling; the z in bazes is not normalized to s . The two sentences, negative bases, tous and final point image remain roman. Raised 3 follows pointe before the period. The variant’s 17 septembre is not substituted for the main date.
S4. Source editor’s annotation “The devout. Love their comforts because they love recollection, and because comfort favors it. Let us therefore excuse them this weakness, since it has so good a principle.” (First version. )
T83. Recollection renders devotional recueillement as inward gathering or attentiveness, not the retrieval of a memory. Both occurrences, the causal sequence, inclusive exhortation and taste metaphor remain.
T89. The subjectless second sentence, two causal links, inclusive exhortation and final principle remain. The concluding version label stays outside the quotation; it is the source editor’s framing. Love renders the finite third-person plural Aiment , whose subject the devout is carried over from the preceding fragment; it is not an imperative. Only version and its adjoining period correspond to source italics; First and the surrounding parentheses are roman.
T328. The opening quotation contains the separate Dévots. and Aiment sentence, literal Excusons les spacing and two causal links. The closing version label remains outside it. In the French source, only version. is italic; the parentheses, baseline 1 and raised re are roman. The printed first-version number is preserved, not converted into a new date.