T181. The request, two some phrases, secret disposition, denied novelty and repeated everything remain. This is one paragraph continuing onto 859; no separate owner or heading is created at the page turn. Happy is not turned into an unmarked explicit sarcasm. [Instruction] and [happy] broadly render the incomplete ins[…]ruction and […]eureux across the 858–859 continuation. Missing French letters remain uncertified.
T342. The complete 8 remains. Dites moi has no hyphen; secrette has doubled t . Both quelque forms, subjunctive fasse , negative vient , and the final repeated tout /present passive forms remain. One paragraph continues onto 859 before its first star. At the page join, 858 retains ins- and 859 only ruction is complete; a faint interrupted fragment does not certify the missing t . The next opening retains eureux while the expected tall initial stem is incomplete in color and native 391. Both losses remain explicit, without contextual French completion or a new paragraph/date. The named 858 code h/b contour, éblouï upper marks, Huntistes/scait/appellons spellings, annotation date/type/circumflexes and 859 incoming losses are retained as the source specialist’s qualified collation findings.
T183. The two nominal pointers, dash, repeated that-is and likeness of words to speakers remain; no historical episode or irony is explained beyond the source.
T343. The complete 24 is a qualified reading: the curved 2 head, descending diagonal and foot, and the 4 junction/stem remain identifiable in color and native 391 despite local wear. The adjacent ghosting does not justify an extra digit. The two nominal names, periods/dash, present cleft and literal unhyphenated c’est à dire remain. The left start semblables is softened but identifiable in color; no missing word is supplied.
T184. Both can/only restrictions, repeated hope and understood, and half agreement remain. Understood reads entendu in the explanation/opinion context rather than merely heard.
T344. Both restrictive ne...que constructions, repeated on ne peut , repeated être entendu and à moitié remain. The lower left starts et/de are complete in color despite native 391 interruption; no lexical gap is inserted.
T185. The interrupted assertion and printed spelling Lafontaine remain. The source’s terminal (2 janvier) is a closing date cue, rendered once after this paragraph as (January 2), separately from the paired body text. No year or ISO date is supplied; its position before the following 1817 heading does not establish a year, and the entry is not moved.
T345. The same-line terminal parenthesis is a closing date cue, not a second sentence or an opening heading. Its complete 2 is visible in color/native 391. No year is printed; the physical position under the 1816 section and before ANNÉE 1817 does not certify its calendar year. No ISO year is inferred. L’Homère , Français and Lafontaine retain their exact forms. The future question, lowercase c’est and period before the separate date parenthesis remain.
T186. The nominal formulation and repeated errors/come-from remain; the source’s contrast is not converted into a named philosophical distinction.
T346. The repeated nominal relative construction and two errors phrases remain. Hommes retains its identifiable h and final period in color; native interruption alone is not treated as a new gap. This paragraph ends before the printed horizontal rule and ANNÉE 1817 heading; no following entry is imported into 035. The named 859 qualified 24, complete left starts, closing date placement and unresolved year are retained as the source specialist’s qualified collation findings.