Of truth concentrated, or reduced in its expression to little space, to few words; but clear as thin films.
Or: luminous but impalpable, accessible to our insights but inaccessible to our proofs; for the same reason it is inaccessible to all our discussions.
Slander and condemnation without examination (a principle of government).
The regicides who draw us into their cause.
Truth. I. To knead it, mold it and impress a form upon it. II. To [extract] from it only the light (the essence) and make it impalpable (and [perhaps], by that very fact, unalterable). III. To confine oneself to its simple [statement], and draw the consequences.
The first manner contains it whole, with its efficacies. The [second] preserves it. The third introduces some [good] effects of it into life, but does not make it seen and consequently leaves it [unknown]: one then follows it as a blind person.
Noise is the sound of bodies that are not sonorous, or comes from the coming together of bad sounds (there are bad sounds) or of sounds in discord.
Elegance comes from clarity in forms: clarity that makes them easy to grasp; to grasp and even to count. To maintain in oneself the habit of clarity.
To reduce, as they say, to elegant formulas.
Of achromatic clarity. It rarely has an object, at least a real one.
Nothing is so subtle as germs. And yet nothing is so real; and what am I saying? They are the cause of all realities.
The essence, not merely supposed, not merely apparent, not imaginary, but true.
Of the need to admire (common to certain women in literary ages), and which is an alteration of the need to love.
— reduced to such a degree of tenuity (or thinning) that...
Plato, Xenophon and the other writers of Socrates’ school. They have the evolutions of birds’ flight; they make long circuits; they embrace much space; they circle for a long time around the point where they wish to alight and which they always keep in view; they swoop down upon it. It is they who build labyrinths, but labyrinths in the air. They use few figurative or colored words; on the contrary, they choose them simple and common, precisely because the idea they use them to trace is itself a great and long figure. By imagining the wake left in the air by the flight of these birds that amuse themselves by rising, descending, gliding and wheeling, one would have an idea of what I have called the evolutions of their mind and their style. (Perpetual suspension.)
May 1.
One performs experiments in physics at will. But the others can only be perceived, without its being in our power to verify them by repeating them.
T240. The nominal opening, alternative reduction and repeated littleness remain. Thin films preserves the physical pellicules comparison without introducing photography or a particular material. The final clear-as relation is not reduced to mere verbal concision.
T599. Two separate paragraphs remain one unit. The first stays nominal, with an alternative, repeated à peu , semicolon and thin-film comparison. The second opens Ou followed by a colon and lowercase lumineuse . Original-size color confirms literal innaccessible with double n and apperçus with double p . The accessible/inaccessible contrast, elle/l’ references, same-cause relation and toutes remain; no new finite predicate is supplied to the opening fragment.
T241. The opening Or, two opposed pairs and same-reason inference remain. The repeated English inaccessible makes the source’s l’est relation explicit without recovering a lost French word. Insights renders aperçus contextually; proofs is not softened into unsupported claims.
T242. The two nouns, without-examination qualification and parenthetic principle remain a fragment. No government or case is named, and the phrase is not converted into an instruction from the translator. English puts the final period outside the parenthesis; in the French it is printed inside.
T600. The nominal conjunction and sans qualification remain. In the French source, the terminal period is inside the parenthesis, with no additional period after it; the gouver-/nement wrap is complete.
T243. The noun and relative clause stay a fragment. Us remains the object of draw, while their marks possession of the cause; no individuals or particular event are supplied.
T601. The nominal relative construction, plural agents, first-person object and singular their cause remain.
T244. The opening noun and all three inline Roman numerals remain in one paragraph across 832–833. Kneading/molding/impressing, restrictive extraction and statement/consequences retain their distinct actions. Both explanatory parentheses, perhaps and the causal by-that-very-fact relation remain. Knead renders the literal printed paitrir without emending French. [Extract], [perhaps] and [statement] contextually complete […]xtraire , peut-[…]tre and énoncia[…]ion ; the partial French words remain damaged. No new numbered paragraph or completed argument is invented.
T602. Two paragraphs remain one unit across 832/833. Roman I/II/III occur inline within the first paragraph, not as three new paragraphs. Original-size color reads literal paitrir with ai . The printed end of 832 retains N’en ; the small adjacent blot does not certify lexical punctuation, so no hyphen is added between en and the following damaged verb. At 833 only xtraire , tre after peut- , ion after énoncia- , econde , ons and er after igno- are complete. The incomplete e/ê/t/s/b/r components remain explicit losses. The lexical hyphen in peut- is retained before the loss; ordinary word-wrap hyphens elsewhere are removed only when joining the retained word parts. La première is a separately indented second paragraph with a qualified intact initial L . All three methods, the repeated pronouns, toute , plural efficacités , quelques , negative ne...pas , consequence and final blind following remain. The bounded independent comparison agrees with the six margin limits and named new 832 code/spelling/type targets, retaining all contour qualifications and excluding new 833 units.
T245. All three manner references and whole/some distinction remain. Efficacies preserves the unusual plural efficacités rather than reducing it to a single abstract effectiveness. The third manner’s negative seeing clause, consequent ignorance and blind following remain. It continues to refer to truth; this is a separate explanatory paragraph within the same unit. [Second] and [good] contextually complete […]econde and […]ons . [Unknown] is a broader adjectival counterpart to the damaged French verb igno[…]er ; it does not certify its lost letter. All six losses occur on the continuation page 833.
T247. The noise/sound distinction, two alternatives and parenthetic repetition of bad sounds remain. Not sonorous retains the source’s difficult quality distinction without turning it into a claim that the bodies make no sound. Coming together renders concours here as concurrence, not a competition.
T248. The repeated clarity and grasp, even count and final infinitive remain. The forms are not replaced by a named artistic medium or a claim that all beauty is numerical.
T249. The infinitive and parenthetic unnamed attribution remain. No object of reduction is supplied, and this stays the second paragraph of the same unit.
T250. The nominal opening, technical achromatic and rarely/at-least limits remain. Achromatic retains the absence-of-color idea without imposing a specific optical instrument. One is ordinary English grammar referring back to object.
T251. Both nothing-so comparisons, the And openings, questioning self-correction and all-realities claim remain. Germs retains germes as beginnings or rudiments of growth, without equating them with modern disease-causing microbes. Subtle is not reduced to merely clever; no scientific proof is added. English capitalizes They after the printed question mark; the French has lowercase ils .
T252. The nominal construction and repeated not-merely qualifications remain, with the third simple negation distinct. True renders véritable without assigning an unprinted philosophical system.
T606. The nominal fragment and three non pas constructions remain without a supplied predicate. The wrapped opening r of rente is abraded but identifiable in original-size color/native 365.
T253. Both need formulations and the parenthetic restriction remain. Common does not become universal, and alteration leaves the relation visible without adding a diagnosis or a named individual. The uneven Of-and-which construction is preserved.
T607. The initial nominal construction, parenthetic scope, certaines and relative et qui remain. The initial c of cles after siè- is identifiable despite margin abrasion.
T254. The initial dash, subjectless participle, such-degree relation and unfinished that remain. Tenuity/thinning keeps both formulations with their parenthetic alternative; no substance or omitted result is supplied.
T255. The complete aerial image retains circuits, embracing space, the landing point and all four final flight movements. Evolutions is used in its movement sense, as in the earlier wing passage, not biological development. Long time, always, few, on-the-contrary and precisely preserve the progression. The repeated labyrinths and figure/figurative relation remain, with simple/common words distinguished from the long idea they trace. The conditional imagining and final parenthetic fragment remain. No individual work or actual flight behavior is authenticated. The source’s comma after longtemps is omitted in the English phrase for a long time around; the final period stays inside the parenthesis in both languages. Literal abbatent , employent , appellé and qualified perpétuëlle remain unchanged in French.
T609. In the French source, one long paragraph retains all repeated ils , semicolons, the comma after longtemps , plain unhyphenated elle même , and the final parenthesis with its internal period. Original-size color confirms literal abbatent , both employent , and appellé ; no modern spellings replace them. The semicolon after colorés remains; its adjacent thin vertical trace does not certify an added letter. The two raised components over e in perpétuëlle support its qualified diaeresis. The line openings ont/embrassent/point/s’y/rinthes/les/que/longue/oiseaux/on/et retain identifiable foreground letters under abrasion; adjacent left-margin show-through does not establish additional words. The bounded independent comparison of full color 833 and the seven named original-size rectangles agrees with these qualified contours; no body, date or style change is requested.
T256. At will contrasts with the later lack of power; can-only and verification by repetition retain their limits. The others preserves the source’s unstated category, allowing the wider experiences sense of expériences without inventing a named field or turning perceived events into controlled experiments.
T610. The complete 1 with raised er and May are retained. Literal appercevoir has double p and renouvellant double l . The restrictive ne...que , reflexive perception and sans qualification remain; no causal or temporal adjunct is supplied.