— Comparable to those white waxes that burn only for the altar [and] illuminate only palaces. He had their dryness, but a flexible [dryness]; and he had their purity.
A submission offered, a submission promised, a submission [sworn], a submission that in any case was owed and inevitable, seemed an [act] of heroism. A prince seemed to them exiled or banished to his [palace], a bishop to his diocese, a poet far from court. They pity [the] pontifical hands because they could no longer touch the [scepter] and because they held the censer.
A king who did not appreciate this mind appears to them an unjust monarch [and] almost an oppressive monarch. Cooled enthusiasm [seems] to them treachery; restrained partiality, a cowardly and shameful [abandonment]; loss of favor, an excessive persecution: as [if] this pious soul had been capable of saying:
Then I shall no longer be able to be seen except by God. (Boileau.)
This very ordinary occurrence, of two merits failing to recognize each other, [is] regarded here as a monstrous event, through [false] respect and false piety toward a false misfortune.
Naturally the soul sings to itself everything that is beautiful, or everything that seems so. And it does not always sing it to itself in verse or measured words, but in expressions and images in which there is a certain sense, a certain feeling, a certain form and a certain color that have a certain harmony with one another and each within itself.
When the soul happens to proceed in this way, one feels the fibers tighten and all come into tune. They resound of themselves and despite the author, whose whole labor then consists in listening to himself, tightening again the string he hears slackening and loosening the one that gives sounds too high, as those with a delicate ear are obliged to do when they play some harp. Those who have produced some piece of this kind will understand me well and acknowledge that to write and compose in this way, one must play, and that to play in this fashion, one must first make oneself, or become with each work, an organized instrument.
And, in this kind, the diapason, outside which there is no longer song, but noise, or at most chirping. And for each air, performance in a determined key, which must be kept to the end without changing it for a single instant.
To do well, one must forget that one is old when one is old, and not feel too strongly that one is young when one is young.
Astonishing, admirable. What astonishes astonishes once; but what is truly admirable is admired more and more:
and which, ever more beautiful, the more they are looked upon...
As hands would feel it or as the eye sees them; that is the great question.
T107. The initial dash and subjectless comparison remain. White waxes preserves the plural material image rather than silently substituting candles. Both only restrictions, the repeated dryness and its flexibility, and the later purity remain. English had renders the source’s descriptive avoit and subsequent narrative eut without inventing a change of character. The first [and] renders […]t , and flexible [dryness] renders séche[…]esse ; the other dryness and later and are intact.
T487. Five paragraphs remain one undated unit. Paragraph 4 is a centered single roman verse line with its roman parenthetic attribution; the following indented prose is a separate fifth paragraph. No quotation marks, additional date or recovered subject is added. The bottom II. 23 printing signature is excluded. Paragraph 1 retains its opening dash and nominal comparison, both restrictive ne...que constructions, the imperfect avoit versus simple-past eut , and the flexible-dryness contrast. The damaged connective retains only t ; the séche- continuation retains esse , without certifying r . Paragraph 2 retains four soumission terms, the alternatives and all shifts of subject/tense. Only rée/cte/alais/es/ceptre survive the five damaged openings; the preceding j/u/a/p/d/s components are not certified. The initial a/e/c remnants within those retained groups remain abraded but identifiable at a qualified level. Duë has two separate raised components over e , not a circumflex over u , in both original-size color and native 353; poëte also keeps the diaeresis. Both paroit forms in paragraph 3 retain plain i : their compact dot-like marks do not certify a circumflex. The second has a missing initial before aroit . The other damaged openings preserve t , bbandon and i ; doubled b remains visible before andon , without restoring the lost initial a . The negative, presque , repeated judgment sequence, two colons and eût été construction remain. Paragraph 5 literally reads Cette accident ; its anomalous agreement is not normalized. The final two damaged openings retain only st and aux , with no e/f restoration. The repeated false terms, comma after ordinaire and final period remain. The bounded independent comparison of the six new 821 units agrees with the named date and margin limits, upper marks, verse topology and apparatus/call boundaries; all contour qualifications remain.
T108. The four submission formulations, in-any-case qualification, obligation/inevitability and seeming heroism remain. The prince/bishop/poet comparisons are not collapsed. The French shifts from parut to present plaint ; English follows that shift. Pontifical hands, scepter and censer remain bodily and ceremonial images without an assigned historical event. The subordinate imperfects remain past: could no longer touch and held. Repeating because distinguishes the second affirmative predicate from the first negative modal, preserving both source causal clauses. [Sworn], [act], [palace] and [scepter] contextually render […]rée , […]cte , […]alais and […]ceptre . [The] is a contextual determiner for […]es before mains , whose surviving letters do not certify les rather than des or a demonstrative; it does not claim a recovered French word. Literal duë and poëte retain their diaereses.
T109. The past did-not-appreciate and present appears/seems preserve the tense contrast. The unnamed them, repeated monarch and almost remain. The three parallel judgments and final hypothetical capacity lead into the following separate verse paragraph; no missing speech or identity is invented. [And], the second judgment’s [seems], [abandonment] and [if] render […]t , […]aroit , […]bbandon and […]i . The doubled b in the abandonment residue and plain i in both paroit readings remain in French. The first appears has intact support.
T110. The future possibility, no-longer restriction, passive being-seen and named attribution remain. This is a fresh translation of the displayed source line, not an independently authenticated Boileau quotation. It remains a separate verse paragraph following the preceding colon. The source line and its parenthetic attribution are roman; the single verse line is centered. No quotation marks are added.
T111. The very-ordinary/monstrous comparison, two merits, mutual failure and three false terms remain. Merits preserves the source’s personifying shorthand instead of replacing it with named people. Toward interprets the final genitive as the object of the piety in context. [Is] and [false] render […]st and the first […]aux ; the next two false terms are intact. Literal Cette accident remains despite its anomalous agreement; English grammar does not repair the French.
T112. The reflexive singing, beautiful/seems-beautiful alternative, not-always qualification and measured/unmeasured contrast remain. All five certain formulations and the four sense/feeling/form/color terms are preserved. The mutual and inward harmony relations remain; no physiological mechanism is supplied. Literal un certains sens retains anomalous plural certains after singular un . The feminine l’une/l’autre/chacune most directly resumes form and color; a broader harmony across the preceding list is a contextual reading rather than a uniquely fixed French attachment.
T488. Three paragraphs remain one undated unit. Paragraph 1 literally prints un certains sens with final s on certains despite singular un ; the later certain/certaine forms remain distinct. The self-directed song, not-always qualification, alternatives, harmony and feminine l’une/l’autre/chacune sequence remain. Paragraph 2 retains its musical operations, all/tout forms, malgré , two future predicates, repeated jouer , paired obligations and final faire/devenir alternative. Haut is printed without plural s in sons trop haut . Travail retains ordinary i at the qualified color level. The visible right-edge endings remain complete despite show-through; no additional gap is inferred. Paragraph 3 preserves the initial dependent/nominal construction, literal diapazon with z , ne...plus , at-most alternative and the second nominal air/execution formulation. The exé-/cution wrap is complete. All three paragraphs are roman.
T113. The soul, fibers, strings and harp remain one extended image. All, of-themselves, despite and whole labor retain their force. Tightening and loosening keep the opposed tuning actions; high refers contextually to pitch. The repeated play formulations remain, with make-oneself/become alternatives and each work. Organized preserves organisé . The complete 1798 Académie Organiser entry supports functional arrangement and bodily, musical and figurative associations; it does not establish that Joubert means the entry’s specific organ-and-keyboard construction or a biological mechanism. French sons trop haut retains singular haut despite plural sons ; English high has no corresponding agreement ending.
T114. Both And openings and the nominal musical formulations remain. Diapason retains the source technical word, glossed by the complete 1798 Académie entry as the range of a voice or instrument between its lowest and highest sounds. It stays distinct from the following key; neither a tuning fork nor a fixed reference pitch is supplied. The dictionary’s diapason does not authorize changing Joubert’s visible diapazon . No-longer, at-most, each, must, end and single instant retain their limits. Chirping preserves gazouillement without making it a fully formed song.
T115. The obligation, forget/feel distinction and all four age terms remain. Not too strongly preserves the degree rather than forbidding awareness of youth altogether.
T489. The obligation, repeated old/young predicates and limited ne pas trop remain. The right-edge repeated vieux is complete at the qualified color level. No date or further contrast word is supplied.
T116. Both repeated word families, once, truly and more-and-more remain. The opening adjectives stay fragments, and the colon leads into a separate verse paragraph rather than an invented concluding sentence. The source opens with plain capital E in Etonnant , which is not silently accented in French.
T490. Two paragraphs remain: the first is prose and ends with a colon, while the second is a centered single roman verse line. Etonnant opens with plain capital E , despite the following accented étonne forms. The once/increasing comparison, lowercase et , dependent qui , plural beaux/ils and terminal printed ellipsis remain; no missing predicate or quotation marks are supplied.
T117. The lowercase and, dependent relative, plural they and terminal ellipsis remain. The source’s compressed clause is not supplied with a new finite verb. This stays one separate displayed verse paragraph; no author, missing opening or complete poem is supplied. The single centered verse line is roman, with a printed ellipsis rather than a reproduction-loss marker.
T118. The conditional tactile clause and present visual clause remain different. It and them preserve the visible singular le versus plural les rather than silently assigning one common object. The semicolon and final judgment remain.
T491. The singular le and plural les are distinct printed objects, with conditional sentiroient versus present voit . The alternative, semicolon and final judgment remain. L’œil has the œ ligature and ordinary dotted i , with no certified diaeresis. No object is supplied from context.