S1. Source editor’s annotation Notebook.
T99. The quoted infinitive, obligation, reflexive adornment and either/or degrees remain. Graces keeps the source’s lower-case plural rather than assigning an identified representation or an external maxim. [A great deal] is the whole English amount phrase for damaged beau[…]up ; no French letters are restored. The day remains […] février. , without a completed digit. The separate call 1 follows février before its terminal period and leads to the roman source annotation Carnet. American English places the quotation’s comma inside its closing mark.
T126. The source editor’s one-word designation remains separate apparatus, attached to the preceding February date heading. It is not an additional Joubert entry, title or date. The complete roman Carnet. is attached to call 1 after février and before the date’s terminal period; its English Notebook. also remains roman.
T481. The first day retains only an incomplete curved right-hand component, which does not establish a complete numeral. The raised call 1 follows février and precedes its separate terminal period. In the French source, the main quotation closes before its comma, and both ou alternatives remain. The beau- line wrap continues at the damaged left edge. Only up is retained as complete; the preceding c/o components are not certified from the isolated right curve and show-through. No amount word is silently restored. The paragraph is roman.
T482. The complete one-word annotation Carnet. is roman and ends with a period. It belongs to the date call, not to a newly inserted main-text sentence.
T100. The nominal statement and regained quality remain without an invented subject, cause or historical event. No complete day is supplied from the surrounding sequence. Its separately printed date remains […] février. ; the day is not supplied.
T483. The second date retains a merged upper/lower right-hand remnant, insufficient to distinguish a complete numeral; no date is recovered from sequence. Premier and the whole nominal phrase remain, with no finite verb or named event supplied.
T101. Both domains, the soul’s zeal, everything and always remain. The fire/light relation is not replaced by an explanatory psychology; some keeps the indefinite quelque . [Because] renders damaged […]arce together with intact que , and [light] renders […]umière ; secret remains outside the bracket. Literal secrette retains its doubled t in French.
T484. The repeated en , relative clause, tout/toujours and fire/light relation remain. Secrette retains doubled t . At the next two line openings only arce and umière are retained; the incomplete components before them do not certify p or l . The surviving a/u contours are degraded but identifiable at the qualified color/native level.
T102. The questioned name remains within the printed source brackets. Insinuating and insidious remain distinct, with the parenthetic denial intact; insinuating describes subtle entry or influence rather than certifying deception. Suppleness and the spiral retain their imagery. Good grace keeps bonne grâce as an aesthetic and social quality. Both comparisons, itself, perhaps, initial And and the reflexive folding image remain; no psychological motive is supplied. [Suppleness], [grace] and [more] render Sou[…]lesse , […]âce and […]lus contextually. These translator loss brackets are distinct from the printed editorial [Fénelon?] ; gentler has intact French support.
T485. The questioned name is a printed roman source-editor bracket, not a recovered attribution. The parenthetic negation, cependant with one p , peut-être , both comparative/repeated-root phrases and the final nominal mind phrase remain. The Sou- continuation retains lesse but not a complete preceding p ; the next two lines preserve âce and lus without certifying their missing initials. The l stems, a circumflex and surviving u are identifiable with contour limits in original-size color/native strips. No extra word is inferred at these damaged openings.
T103. Only, enough, especially, less, better, most and always preserve the qualifications and comparisons. The not-knowing participle refers to the metaphysicians. The unnamed him is not independently identified; the repeated light/truth relation remains Joubert’s formulation. [Pleasing], [metaphysics], [abstractions] and [truth] render […]gréable , méta[…]hysique , […]bstractions and […]érité . The first [resembles] broadly renders damaged […]st together with intact le plus semblable ; most remains separately expressed. The second resembles has intact support. Literal assés and scachant remain in French; no day is completed in […] février .
T486. Four paragraphs remain under this one damaged date; its surviving joined component does not securely establish a complete 5/6 or other numeral. The first paragraph retains seuls , the two negative constructions, assés with s and acute, literal scachant , moins/mieux and repeated semblable . At the first paragraph’s damaged openings only gréable , hysique after méta- , bstractions , st and érité are retained. The missing a/p/a/e/v forms are not supplied. The g/r , h/b and accented e contours remain abraded but identifiable at the qualified color/native level. Paragraph 2 preserves only étaphysiques after the incomplete initial m components. Paragraph 3 remains a nominal formulation followed by a comparative reflexive statement. Paragraph 4 begins the dependent Et que and retains its complete subject list, much-more comparison and conjecture/combination distinction. Before connoissent only incomplete small strokes survive, so no complete se or final e is certified. Before rtout , the preceding s/u structures remain incomplete. No missing reflexive or degree word is supplied in the French source from the syntax.
T104. The repeated abstract root, explicit but and elliptical final beings remain. About avoids making speak well a necessary statement of praise, while preserving the claim that abstractions can adequately discuss their own kind of being. [Metaphysical] contextually renders […]étaphysiques ; ones supplies the elliptical noun in English without representing another source loss.
T105. Evidence renders évidence in the context of immediate self-apprehension, rather than asserting empirical data. The nominal opening and reflexive feels/sees comparison remain distinct.
T106. The dependent And that opening is not converted into an independent conclusion. All three examples and feeling/conjecture/combination remain. The compressed placement of especially or above all in the final comparison is left visible; no additional doctrine or uniquely settled scope is supplied. [Are] known selects a conjectural passive/reflexive interpretation of the wholly unreadable slot before intact connoissent , plausibly se ; that French word is not certified or restored. The complete English degree phrase [above all] renders damaged […]rtout . This provisional construction leaves the final comparison’s scope open.