T87. The brief contrast and both parenthetic references remain. English finite predicates convey the source’s asymmetrical copula and duration phrases. The second compressed reference is left unexpanded, and no original sermon, liturgical setting or local edition is assigned. The specialist read the complete electronic Latin Isaiah 54; verse 8 supports the contrast between brief indignation and enduring mercy. Joubert’s compressed French omits the verse’s speaker, actions and addressee. This fresh English renders his formulation, not an exact biblical quotation; no original Bible image or French witness was read.
T209. Both parenthetic abbreviated references stay roman inside this one main paragraph, without an apparatus call or a new date. Their exact punctuation, numeral and Senon. reading remain; neither reference is expanded from context. In the French source, the duration contrast keeps its comma and the second clause’s absent finite verb. The éter-/nelle wrap has a degraded but qualified identifiable n in the color/native margin view and is joined without a new gap. The separately checked Isaiah parallel is discussed in the translation note; Joubert’s compression is not treated as an exact biblical quotation.
T88. Both fragments and the equal comparison remain. Effort renders démarche contextually as an action taken; the text does not identify a favor or make the refusal successful. The final with success preserves avec fruit rather than omitting the outcome. [And] contextually renders […]t , whose missing initial letter is not restored in French.
T210. The nominal opening, relative negative point and Aussi...que comparison remain. Touché has a qualified identifiable initial t in the color/native view; the two different agreement endings fait/faite remain. Joye is literal. At the last line opening only t is complete before avec ; the expected preceding e is not certified from the incomplete remnant. The marker preserves that source loss without turning a contextual conjunction into an intact French word.
T89. The degree relation, everything, even and most remain. Flavors is the specific material example; it is not replaced by a general sensory experience. The statement remains Joubert’s bodily image. [What] is the broad English counterpart of the nominal relative containing damaged […]e and intact qu’il y a ; not all its French components are lost. The date preserves only […]9, without completing the day from chronology.
T211. Only the terminal 9 is certifiable as a qualified numeral. The preceding upright lacks enough structure to establish a complete 1, so chronology does not restore 19. The degree/result relation, all/even scope and material/taste example remain. Before e qu’il y a the initial c contour is incomplete at the folded margin; no complete c is restored. The final comma and par exemple remain.
T90. The literal opening -l-M-t +. remains an opaque code with a baseline plus-shaped sign, not a name expansion or an apparatus call. [Martyr], the first [all], and [injustices] contextually render […]artyr , […]ous and injus[…]ices ; the other two all terms are intact. The paired willingness and refusal, courageously, and the distinction between labor and injustice remain. Its retains the unnamed relation carried by en ; no cause or movement is invented. The date preserves only […]0 without completing its earlier digit.
T212. Only the terminal 0 is complete in the date; the earlier curved components do not certify 2. The code is read literally as -l-M-t +. , with a baseline l , capital M and a final t with an identifiable crossbar. No additional leading letter or lost initial is inferred before its printed hyphen; the code begins within the ordinary indented line area. The plus-shaped sign remains baseline and opaque, not an apparatus call or name expansion. The two veux bien phrases, heroic/martyr contrast and all three tous/toutes terms retain their force. At the folded openings only artyr and ous are complete; at the injus-/tices wrap only ices follows the incomplete initial remnant. The m/t/t components are not certified from context and remain marked as source losses. The historical inconvéniens and the singular/plural distinctions remain literal.
T91. The nominal opposition and parenthetic alternative remain. The English distinguishes literal malhommie , bonhommie and mauvaise-hommie through ill/good/bad nature, but cannot reproduce their coined hommie family. The French forms are retained unchanged. Initial Or in the English parenthesis is capitalized; the source has lower-case ou .
T92. The two opening parentheses, opposed noun/epithet relations and complete lists remain. Epithet preserves the technical attributed modifier, without limiting it to an insult. [The], [and] and [pomp] contextually render […]e , […]t and […]ompe . The damaged […]e before sobre has no separate English counterpart in something sober and sufficient; no French d is restored. The nominal negative and compressed even adorned leave the attachment to simplicity or truth open. All clothing, brilliance, dye and juice images survive. The final sentence freshly renders intact Latin Proprio fucata succo depromunt. ; things carries its neuter plural object. The complete Latin sentence and complete English counterpart are italic through their periods. No external locus was verified in the bounded search. The paragraph crosses 805–806 without a break; the entry’s date preserves only […]1.
T214. Only the final 1 in the date is certifiable; the earlier curved/foot remnants do not establish a complete 2. Three physical paragraphs remain in this unit: the first crosses 805/806 and ends after the Latin sentence, followed by two separate paragraphs before 806’s first star. The bottom printing signature on 805 is excluded from the prose. The first paragraph keeps both opening parentheses, all noun/epithet relations, restrictive seul , two alternatives couleur/couleurs and figure/figures , and its exact negative/restrictive sequence. On 805 only e , t , e and ompe are complete at the four marked margin losses; the missing l/e/d/p forms are not supplied from grammar. The consé-/quent wrap itself is intact and does not mark a new loss. The continuation on 806 has nuë with two distinct raised e -components and literal hyphenated clair-semées . Its right-edge si , épithète , vêtu. , sa , la and Proprio retain identifiable foreground endings in the color view, without extrapolating extra words beyond the margin. The Latin Proprio fucata succo depromunt. is italic throughout, including its terminal period; no other part of this unit is italic or converted into a quotation. Paragraph 2 literally reads Quesnel abbonde with two b letters and retains peut-être ; the ordinary méta-/phorique wrap remains joined. Paragraph 3 preserves du moins , both ne...plus forms, peut-être , the negative en tout qualification, the antique-cup image, literal nous même without a hyphen or plural s , and the final shipwreck/remaining-taste judgment. None of these distinctions is normalized into a smoother doctrine. The completed bounded independent comparison agrees with the date limits, new 805 losses and incoming 806 Latin/diacritic readings, with their stated contour qualifications retained.
T93. The hidden modifier and metaphorical noun remain distinct. Perhaps qualifies faults, not the abundance of expressions; no particular Quesnel work is assigned. French abbonde is retained with its literal double b ; ordinary English abounds does not emend the source.
T94. The repeated loss of simplicity, perhaps, at least, both exhortations to longing, comparative worth and the final simultaneous perishing/saving remain. Gold keeps the vessel metonymy rather than silently naming a particular cup material for the ancient cups. The shipwreck remains literal imagery; the speaker is not rescued from it by the English. French nous même is retained without an added hyphen or plural s ; English ourselves carries the reflexive relation.
T95. The opening fragments and missing explicit subject of Has remain. Lumps of ice renders glaçons without inventing a diagnosis; knots retains nœuds as bodily imagery. Only at the end keeps the restrictive destination and timing. The source literally has unaccented age and capital A . Has is a qualified finite-avoir reading of A ; an unaccented prepositional À reading also remains possible. The unaccented printed A does not settle the alternative, and neither an accent nor an explicit subject is inserted into French.
T215. The two short opening fragments, plain age and plain capital A remain literal; no missing verb or accent is supplied from modern usage. The knees/elbows/all-joints sequence, changing possessive and final restrictive ne...que remain. The right-edge les and arrivent retain identifiable endings in color/native comparison. The plain A permits a finite-avoir reading as well as an unaccented-preposition interpretation; neither is uniquely certified by the unaccented printed A .
T96. The opaque initials, past possibility, dash and first-person contrast remain. Carries ice renders the elliptical river-ice sense expressly recorded in the Académie dictionary of 1798; English makes its implicit object explicit. The contrast with frozen supports applying that image to blood here. The specialist read the complete official electronic Charrier entry, including all senses and examples; no original dictionary page was inspected. No speaker or medical condition is identified.