T68. The nominal opening, repeated in it, only restriction and strong impression remain. Add is Joubert’s instruction, not a translator addition. The bounded patience/consolation quotation has a qualified parallel in Latin Romans 15:4, with the paired concepts recurring in verse 5. The specialist directly read the bounded Romans 15:1–13 electronic Latin text; no original Bible image, French or English Bible wording, or Nicole commentary was read. This does not certify Joubert’s use of a particular witness. The Nicole passage remains unlocated; the date preserves only a qualified terminal 9, with any preceding digit unresolved. The English comma follows American style inside the quotation; the French places it after the closing guillemet. The paragraph crosses 803–804 without a new division.
T195. The date preserves a qualified terminal 9: its upper bowl and descending hooked stem are identifiable, but left-edge damage prevents certifying an earlier digit or asserting that the day is complete. No preceding numeral is supplied. This single paragraph continues through the first two lines of 804 before its star. In the French source, the quotation starts after Ajoutez : and closes after consolation before the comma. Both conjoined scriptural nouns, the restrictive ne...que , the Saint Paul attribution and très bien commenté par Nicole remain literal; no quotation is replaced from an external witness. Plain initial Ecriture and poësie with two raised e components remain. The folded la at the 803 line opening and com at 804’s right edge are degraded but identifiable in color; the com-/menté wrap is ordinary and does not imply an extra lost m . The final attribution and all quotation text remain roman. Independent bounded comparison agrees with the qualified day suffix, named diacritic and incoming 804 continuation limits; no additional initial or paragraph is supplied.
T69. The equal comparison and its self-clarifying parenthesis remain. All three conditions on the feelings retain their force; feeling is not substituted for reason or made universally reliable. The first [with] contextually renders ave[…] ; the second with is intact. Praiseworthy renders the intact louable : its lost French agreement ending has no separate English counterpart. The English list comma after praiseworthy is editorial punctuation, not a recovered source mark.
T196. The clear date 10 décembre remains. The repeated aussi and parenthetic self-explanation, feeling/idea comparison and conditional qualification remain. At the right edge only ave and louable are securely complete; their endings and any following punctuation are not certified. The losses are retained without supplying c , s or a comma. The visible e contours are degraded but identifiable at the qualified color/native level.
T70. Both better comparisons and the two groups remain. The lower-case father and son are not assigned a theological or personal identity.
T197. The clear date 11 décembre , repeated mieux , comma and the lower-case père/fils pair remain. The second clause retains its ellipsis of the verb; no doctrinal capitalization or explanatory name is introduced.
T71. Both almost qualifications remain, preserving the asymmetry of divine and ignorant rather than changing it to a balanced praise and blame. No work or biographical conclusion is supplied. Only the second [almost] renders a damaged form, presqu[…] ; the first presque is complete.
T198. The first presque is complete; only presqu is complete at the right edge in the second occurrence. The lost ending is marked, without silently making the two occurrences typographically identical. The philosophical/theological comparison and clear 12 décembre date remain.
T72. The nominal opening and certain qualification remain. Dullness contextually renders imbécillité as weakness of mind; no modern diagnosis is assigned. The mechanical quality modifies the state of joy. [Is] is a contextual rendering of e[…] ; that represents the intact relative qui . The lost verb ending is not restored in French.
T199. The nominal fragment, two commas, certain and historical joye remain. At the right edge the verb’s initial e is identifiable, but the following partial strokes do not certify complete s/t ; the ending remains an explicit loss. No finite form is recovered from syntax alone.
T73. The equal necessity, repeated fear and parallel keeping remain. Goodness and life keep the two distinct destinations of retenir dans . The first [in] contextually renders dan[…] ; the later dans is intact.
T200. The clear 14 décembre date and repeated fear/retain comparison remain. The first dans loses its final component at the right edge; only qualified identifiable dan is preserved. The second dans is fully printed and remains distinct.
T74. The opening fragments, knowledge alternative, almost and reversed memory/judgment relation remain. Note and the internal 2° stay inside the same paragraph; no first numbered item is invented. [Its], [judgment], [an], [complete] and [colors] contextually render Se[…] , jugemen[…] , un[…] , complett[…] and colorant[…] . The possessive remains qualified and does not uniquely identify its owner. English sentence divisions and the coordination colors and gives form do not recover punctuation or a conjunction at the damaged endings. Produces renders the unusual effectrice as bringing about effects, distinct from mere recollection; the complete later nineteenth-century Littré entry supports this sense. This is a later electronic lexical control, not a period Académie attestation, an original dictionary image or evidence of Joubert’s source. The French emphasizes Nota alone, with its colon roman, and effectrice through the following comma. English correspondingly emphasizes Note alone and that produces through its comma: the relative clause renders the single French adjective. The surrounding memory and the later color/form description remain roman.
T201. The clear 16 décembre date owns this one physical paragraph. The parenthetic alternative, writer qualification, almost comparison, internal dash and unexplained inline 2° remain; no missing 1° or new paragraph is supplied. Scavoir and the conditional spelling vaudrait remain literal. The right-edge losses after Se , jugemen , un , complett and colorant are marked without supplying letters or uncertain following punctuation. The source preserves two t letters in complett before its lost ending. The surviving e/n/t contours are degraded but identifiable in the color/native comparison; no sentence ending or coordinating comma is invented at the damaged edge. Nota alone is italic with the following colon roman. Effectrice is italic through its following comma; the surrounding mémoire and later descriptors are roman. Both exact emphasis boundaries were read in the original-size color crop; the bounded independent comparison now agrees with the narrow ending limits and style boundary, retaining all contour qualifications.
T75. The cleft emphasis, nominal negative fragment and complete four-term analogy remain. Simple memory and cold judgment are not renamed as imagination or feeling. [Simple] contextually renders si[…]ple without recovering the missing French component.
T202. The taste/soul/body relation, negative fragment and proportional comparison remain; froid and proprement dit are not collapsed. The first ima-/gination wrap has qualified identifiable letters in color and creates no gap. At the later sim-/ple wrap, the final component after si lacks a complete m , so si[…]ple preserves the visible limit without repairing it from simple .
T76. The bounded quotation, separate attribution, source and, alternative parenthesis and modal reply remain. Rigorists/rigorous/rigors preserve the repeated word family without identifying a group beyond the text. In of rigors, of represents intact de ; the damaged remainder of de[…] has no independently rendered English article. No French s is silently restored. The source ends with a period despite its inverted reporting construction.
T203. The quoted first term, both parentheses, two reporting constructions and rigoriste/rigoureux/rigueur wordplay remain. Only de is complete before the right-edge loss; no s is silently supplied. The final printed mark is a period despite the inverted peut-on construction.