T30. The past assertion and physical head image remain; fine is not silently converted into a biographical claim about achievement or moral character.
T176. The single sentence is separated from the preceding continuation by a star. Printed fut remains past; no date is assigned across the separator. The initial M and circumflex in tête retain identifiable color contours despite nearby ghosting. All wording is roman.
T31. The two nominal terms, semicolon and sufficiency remain. The damaged day is not inferred from nearby dates.
T177. No complete numeral survives before décembre ; the day remains wholly unknown. The source’s two nominal terms, semicolon and sufficient predicate remain, with no added possessive or theological gloss. The line is roman.
T32. The nominal opening, stripping action and quoted demonstrator remain. English repeats blindfold to make the two French object pronouns legible, without identifying these people or specifying a particular form of demonstration. [Religion] broadly renders […]eligion : the missing initial is not restored in French. The quotation-period placement follows American house style.
T178. Literal foy and gens-cy retain their spelling and hyphen. At the second-line opening only eligion is complete: no initial r is recovered from the left-edge fragments. In the French source, the last noun remains quoted inside guillemets, followed by a separate period. The source pronouns and all three sentences remain. No date is carried across the star; all text is roman.
T33. The opening fragment, infinitival directions and two parenthetical instructions remain. [On] and [see] contextually render […]ur and […]oir without restoring French initials. Both nothing terms and the final except-by restriction have intact source support; the latter applies to the negative series rather than becoming a separate positive command. Fear has no added object. The single damaged December date belongs to all seven paragraphs and supplies no known day.
T179. Seven separately indented paragraphs remain under one wholly incomplete December day. No complete numeral can be certified from its isolated left-edge block. The paragraphs preserve their different infinitive, nominal and finite constructions without merging. All wording is roman. Paragraph 1 keeps both parenthetic insertions and repeated ne rien ; only ur and oir remain at the damaged openings, with no full s or v certified. Paragraph 2’s line break leaves éga before the hyphen and eroient after the incomplete initial r ; the explicit gap preserves that loss without changing the conditional-looking form. Paragraph 4 retains the parenthesis and colon, but the wrapped hos-/tie lacks a complete initial t ; only ie is secure after the loss. Native binary 333 and original-size color agree on these incomplete components at the qualified level. Paragraph 3 literally prints fera t’il with space/apostrophe. Paragraph 5’s two poëtique and two poësie forms have separated upper e components; capitals Jansénistes /Jésuites differ from the later lower-case jésuites /jansénistes . Paragraph 6’s hait has one dot-like i mark, with no certified diaeresis or circumflex. In the French source, the final quotation closes after Dieu , before the comma; it does not encompass the following comparative judgment. The initial J of Jésuites , the s in sur ce dernier and q in the final que remain abraded but identifiable in color; the surrounding left-side material does not establish additional words. Independent bounded comparison agrees with the named losses, day limits and hait /poëtique /poësie upper marks; all contour qualifications remain.
T34. The nominal blindfold image, purpose and conditional would remain. [Lead us astray] broadly renders damaged éga[…]eroient and includes the counterpart of intact nous ; the verb’s missing component is not restored in French. The paradox is not softened into falsehoods or unreliable opinions.
T35. Both infinitives and the question remain, with an impersonal English subject for the unspecific aimer construction.
T36. The allegory, three unparenthesized emblems and parenthetic host remain, followed by the lack. [Host] is a contextual whole-word counterpart of hos[…]ie and does not restore its lost letter. The separated remains the source’s unnamed designation, without an added institution or doctrine.
T37. The opening nominal designation and reversed poetics/poetry formulas remain. No verb or theological definition is supplied to complete the fragments.
T38. The two opposed assertions, all and the latter/former reference remain. The groups are not explicitly named in this paragraph; English does not assign them.
T39. The quoted torch phrase repeats the first paragraph, and the future comparison remains. English comma placement inside the quotation follows American house style; the quoted phrase alone keeps its boundary.
T40. The question, answer, both serves formulations and only restriction remain. The printed comma after Yes and later semicolon after good keep their distinct roles. Worth more repeats and is intensified a thousand times. The first-person address and opaque N remain without a guessed expansion. French aux marks a plural addressee relation without identifying N .
T180. The source has a comma after Oui , distinct from the later semicolon after bon . Both truth formulations, restrictive ne...que and repeated mieux/mille fois remain. Literal scavant has c , and capital N is opaque and unexpanded. The edge q of qui and initial m of mieux retain qualified identifiable foreground forms, without an added lexical gap. No date is assigned across the star; all text is roman.
T41. The infinitive, necessity, repeated qualities in reversed order and final comparison remain. Changeable is contextual for mobiles , without identifying a particular political body.
T181. The numeral 1 and raised er are identifiable, with slight left-edge abrasion qualified. This December 1 date stays in its printed order. The reversal médiocres/mobiles to mobile/médiocre and final comparison remain. The first f in faut has an identifiable stem and cross stroke in color, though narrow components are degraded. All text is roman.
T42. The nominal opening and incomplete comparison remain. The two future consequences and opposing conditions are kept, including the shift from generic one to you. A man in a fury renders furieux without supplying a diagnosis or historical incident.
T182. The nominal opening and dependent Comme clause remain without a supplied main conclusion. The two futures, two if clauses, shift se/vous and final ne...pas remain. The initial s of se and p of pas at the left edge are abraded but identifiable foreground letters, without a justified additional gap. All wording is roman; no date is carried across the separator.
T43. The repeated weak/beautiful contrast, qualified reported success, only, I mean and I seem remain. The stamp, self-imposed constraint and voice that speaks below its own speaker are preserved. The dependent that sequence remains in its source form, without being recast as independent propositions. The Themis image keeps the misplaced blindfold, seeing eye, careless scales and sword beneath her feet. Who holds and who [has] laid retain her as the acting subject; [has] contextually supplies the wholly lost auxiliary before intact mis , without restoring a in French. No mythological source or named book is identified. The paragraph continues onto 802 without a new division; it is he who preserves the emphasis in c’est lui qui .
T183. The complete 3 has identifiable upper/lower curves in color, though abrasion remains qualified. The single paragraph continues through the first two lines of 802 before the star; no new paragraph or date is inserted at the page break. Both faible/beau repetitions and their separate because clauses remain. The source’s dit-on reports the stated success; no outside attribution is inferred. Literal ceppendant with pp , assés with final s and sens froid remain, without normalization to cependant/assez/sang-froid . The dependent que after the semicolon, self-prescribed constraint and comparative lower voice retain their source syntax. At the left edge the beginnings of parce , the wrapped cès , peut , je , qu’il , est , sa and on are abraded but identifiable in color; no additional words or lost initials are certified there. The following cross-page œ ligature is retained. In the 802 continuation, the short word after et qui has only an incomplete vertical/curved remnant at the folded right edge; it is left wholly unknown rather than supplying a . The following intact mis is not expanded into a repaired finite construction. The final negative sentence remains. All wording is roman. Complete color 801/802 and original-size left/continuation bands have been read; independent bounded comparison agrees with the 801 loss/date targets and only this incoming 802 short-word slot. New 802 units remain a separate review scope.