T69. All, thereafter, both restrictive judgments and the final words/thoughts contrast remain. [And] contextually supplies et at the complete loss before le caractère ; the French connector is not recovered. The two separate [scholiasts]/[scholiast] brackets render […]holiastes and scho[…]aste at complete English-word scope. The conventional English Amyot corresponds here to source Amiot ; the differing French spellings and stile remain unchanged. Scholiast retains the commentator’s technical name. No separate literary-historical finding is asserted.
T70. The past event and loss of sense remain without identifying a reign or narrowing sense to a single faculty.
T394. The complete sentence remains with its past-tense verb and capital Grecs . The statement is transcribed without an explanatory political or historical addition.
T71. The negative contrast, prior judgment and both comparatives remain. [Better] renders damaged meil[…]ur as contextually completed meilleur ; the complete English word is bracketed. It is not strengthened into best.
T395. Plain Etre remains. At the wrapped meilleur , the isolated marks before ur do not establish complete l/e , so the residue stays explicit. The negation/mais contrast, completed judgment and second comparative remain.
T72. Both verbs and the disturbing obligation remain; wit is not softened into kindness or a general recommendation of moderation.
T73. The separate paragraph, wound image and repeated foolish/laugh/fool words remain. Always preserves the final judgment’s scope. [Who] contextually completes […]ui as qui ; the intact celui is represented by the one outside the bracket.
T74. The leading dash, And, unnamed man and after relation remain. Says takes printed dit as a narrative present; its identical passé-simple form also permits said, so the tense choice is contextual rather than uniquely certified by the letters. [For] and [turmoil] render […]ar and […]ouble as contextual Car and trouble , with complete English words bracketed. Neither serenity nor turmoil can be permanent in the second sentence; no biographical incident is identified.
T397. The printed day is obscured by a fused filled mark; no numeral is certified. The paragraph remains one unit despite its second sentence beginning at the damaged ordinary line margin. The two left-edge losses retain ar and ouble ; no C or tr is restored. The surviving o in ouble is abraded but identifiable and remains qualified. The initial dash/Et , temporal relation, printed dit , smiling and toujours/ni relation remain. The form dit can be present or passé simple; its tense is not uniquely certified by the printed form.
T75. The nominal opening, soft sound, interrupted quotation and conditional shadows remain. [Like] contextually renders damaged sembla[…]le as semblable ; the whole translated word is bracketed. Somewhere retains the source’s own uncertainty; no precise Homeric verse is supplied. American punctuation places the terminal period inside the closing quotation, while the French period stays outside.
T398. In the French source, the quotation opens only before et and closes after ombres , with the final period outside. At the wrapped semblable , the incomplete b -shaped contour does not certify a full letter; sembla[…]le preserves the surviving pieces. Homère remains capitalized, unlike lower-case homère on the preceding page; quelque part and conditional feroient remain unexpanded.
T76. The initial comparison fragment, restriction and alternative remain. The tallest trees are not reduced to ordinary treetops; the plants remain distinct.
T399. The day’s upright and upper fragment do not establish a complete digit 1; the whole day remains unknown rather than inferred from chronology. The lower-case comparative fragment, jamais que restriction and two alternatives remain. The abraded d of des retains identifiable stem/bowl portions and is explicitly qualified, with no missing word added.
T77. First-person possession, now-only restriction and the goods/evils pair remain. [My] contextually renders mon from damaged […]on before esprit ; the earlier my body is intact. The French initial is not restored. No medical explanation or diagnosis is added.
T400. The final word opening retains on ; the damaged preceding component does not certify a complete m . Its partial arch is not promoted to a literal full n or a recovered m . The paired biens/maux , mon corps , singular lui and plus que restriction remain.
T78. The unqualified brief assertion remains without a named event or consolation.
T401. Only disconnected curved/vertical portions of the day survive; no complete digit is certified. The complete sentence remains without an added explanation.
T79. The comparative Of fragment remains. Bourgeois retains the social term without importing a later ideological definition; the comparison is not completed.
T402. The nominal De formulation and comparative relation remain without a supplied predicate. Bourgeois and pauvre remain as printed, without a sociological expansion.
S1. Source editor’s annotation On an undated leaf one reads: “Charon, an Egyptian word meaning boatman. 1° The tombs of the Egyptians were enclosed in pyramids or in the sand at great depths. Above all things this people sought to shelter its dead bodies from water. 2° To go and lay the dead in the pyramids, one had in most places to cross the canals of the Nile. It is from there (so it is said, and it is probable) that Orpheus brought to Greece the allegory of the underworld, simple belief in which was subsequently regarded as an article of religion. Thus it is from Egypt that the ferryman of the dead and the fateful boat have come to us.
T81. [We] corresponds to the source editor’s [nous] . The historical inference remains Joubert’s; no newly verified account of Egyptian practices is added. Source note 1 belongs separately after civilization.
T94. The separate apparatus quotes an explicitly undated leaf; internal labels 1° and 2° stay in its one paragraph. The opening quotation has no printed closing mark, and English leaves it open too. Source Egiptiens , Egipte , piramides and faloit remain literal in French; conventional English spelling changes no source letters. The Egyptian etymology and account of Orpheus are the quoted text’s claims. So it is said and it is probable retain their qualifications. Fateful renders fatale without replacing the boat with a different mythological object. The source call follows civilization before its terminal period; no composition date is assigned to this leaf.
T403. The four distinct paragraphs remain in one dated unit. The source’s [nous] is a printed editorial bracket, not a newly supplied reproduction loss. Egyptiens has y and appellons has two l . The second paragraph remains a short nominal conditional/inferential fragment. The third paragraph retains its printed three-dot pause and literal italic Animam condere sepulito. The last Latin word shows the sequence sepulito , including an i with a separate raised dot and a following t -like cross stroke; no familiar Latin wording is substituted. The fourth paragraph literally has mânes , with its circumflex, unlike anges on the earlier page 774. The analogy is not used to repair either source. The raised main call after civilisation has a hooked top and vertical stem supporting a qualified 1 and comes before the baseline period. Independent native comparison confirms the call’s 1 shape and literal sepulito , while retaining the printed Latin without correction.
T82. The separate conditional fragment remains without supplying the repeated noun care or a completed argument.
T83. The care remains pronominal, with the printed ellipsis and conditional fear preserved. The source prints italic Animam condere sepulito. The bracketed for the buried one provisionally interprets sepulito as sepulto , then takes that conjectured form as dative; neither the emendation nor its compressed relation is certain. The brackets mark this English interpretation of an irregular printed word, not a source gap or recovered Latin. Compare Aeneid III.67–68, animamque sepulcro / condimus , a related burial passage with a different final word, a finite plural verb and a conjunction. That bounded parallel also suggests an in-the-tomb alternative but does not establish Joubert’s intended wording. The printed Latin and its infinitive remain unchanged.
T84. The separate paragraph, their belief and the attachment remain. Shades renders mânes without substituting a particular Egyptian conception of the soul or claiming the belief as established fact.