(At Villeneuve.) Religion is the poetry of the heart.
November […]3.
— through hardness of mind or through revolt. Hardness of mind is sometimes no less harmful and no less odious than hardness of heart.
November […]0.
God. We always speak of him in his presence.
Barren places are wholesome. Especially on high ground, amid fertile [plains].
November […]4.
... at least, the luxury of the lowly ruins a state.
November […]5.
A natural mind. Its charm. Never to take from children the naturalness of their mind.
The Genevans have no natural mind. Too much instruction among them stifles this quality.
November 26.
“The parenthyrse,” in Longinus. “To carry the thyrsus” etc. When one is mad outside the thyrsus or without carrying the thyrsus, one deserves only the madhouse.
Their analysis is only a chemical dissolution. Their products are caput mortuum. To draw from a thought everything it contains, doubtless; but identity is a discouraging expression. Count de Milli’s four inches of calcareous earth—that is what he reduced the human body and the whole man to.
It will perish through its own contempt: all its allure lies in its novelty.
They mistake for the happiness of evident truth the pleasure that the mind’s illusions always give it when put in order.
The period has entered philosophical reasoning. A great abuse, for it expresses our affections better, but our apprehensions much less well, disguising them.
November 27.
Locke reasoned with a sort of rigor more adroit than sincere and ingenuous. He abused the simplicity and good faith of the scholastics. He is a sly philosopher. Leibnitz is more frank, more sincere, more enlightened.
It is not God’s intelligence that we must concern ourselves with, but his will. It matters little to us to think of his foreknowledge, but it matters much to us to think of his justice, his goodness, his power, his decrees.
November 29.
Each follows their reason or their religion; for there are those for whom religion (to which everyone is receptive) takes the place of the reason they do not have and cannot have.
That is very true. Everyone is receptive to religion, but not everyone is capable of reason.
1
The Notebooks of Joseph Joubert, Volume II · Book Mode · Diotimos