S1. Source editor’s annotation Separate dated sheet.
T72. Alone and only retain the two different restrictions. Them has no named antecedent. The damaged leu[…] remains in French; leur is a contextual possibility only. The source note identifies a dated separate sheet and belongs to the printed date, not a new author sentence.
T84. Beaunier’s brief source description remains a separate apparatus paragraph. Dated modifies the sheet; the note does not authorize rearranging the surrounding May entries.
T159. The source call 1 follows mai in the date before its terminal period. The right-edge ending after leu is lost; leur is a contextual possibility. The raised mark over the i of maitre does not securely establish a circumflex; the qualified plain-i reading is retained. The opening les remains without an expressed antecedent.
T160. One roman apparatus paragraph belongs to the call in the 2 mai date.
S2. Source editor’s annotation Notebook.
T73. The qualified period after Alors and the following lower-case word remain. Lights preserves the illumination image without reducing it to either literal lamps or knowledge. The clipped s[…] stays in French; sa is a possible possessive, not a restored word. The separate source note identifies a notebook and belongs to the date.
T85. Beaunier’s one-word source description remains separate from Joubert’s body text. It supplies no notebook number, owner, or new date.
T161. The small baseline mark after Alors is retained as a qualified period; toutes remains lower-case. The right-edge ending after s is lost and is not supplied from the likely possessive sa . The source call 2 follows mai in the date before its terminal period.
T162. One roman apparatus paragraph belongs to the call in the 20 mai date.
T74. The repeated nothing but, simple, innocent, and spoiling remain. Their before both taste and heart renders the repeated leur ; the clipped d[…] and l[…] are not restored from possible de and le . The facsimile date reads May 27.
T163. The enlarged facsimile reads 27 mai , with a clear diagonal stroke in the final 7. The right-edge endings after d and l are lost; de and le are possible readings only. The repeated nominal restrictions and reasons remain. Thin horizontal traces near goût and cœur are reproduction artifacts, not added accents.
T75. The dash and unfinished opening remain, followed by the capitalized command. The damaged sourc[…] is not completed and no intervening punctuation is supplied. Living waters keeps eaux vives , with its sense of flowing fresh water and its possible religious resonance; no particular scriptural quotation is asserted.
T164. The opening dash and lower-case cette remain. The source date retains Dimanche 27 mai and the parenthetical A Issy. , with plain capital A . The end of the word beginning sourc and any following punctuation are lost at the right edge; source is a contextual completion only. Faites begins with the visible capital and is not merged into a newly supplied syntax.
T76. The opening judgments and their later qualifications remain distinct. The two quoted-back phrases retain source italics; the broken médi[…]cre , qu[…] , and j[…] stay in French. Médiocre , qui , and je are contextual possibilities only. The like of antiquity renders the comparison without pretending that a French à is visible after semblable . The restrictive nothing except differs from the earlier nothing modern. The shift from antiquity to Antiquity and the explicit extension to 1715 remain.
T165. The first italic médi[…]cre is broken across the line at a damaged right edge; the complete ending between médi and cre is not certified. The later endings after qu and j are also lost. The two repeated phrases alone are italic. No preposition is certifiable after semblable before the next-line l’antiquité . The resulting construction is retained without supplying à or asserting a recoverable lost word. The lower-case antiquité and later capital Antiquité , repeated negations and terminal 1715 remain.
T77. Sight preserves the named faculty, and enthusiastic retains the strong term without supplying a particular object. The second sentence’s categorical negation is Joubert’s formulation; no particular blind person or borrowed argument is identified.
T78. The nominal fragment remains without an added person or verb. By choice takes de choix as love arising from selection, rather than making choice itself the beloved object; the short phrase does not specify the relation further.
T167. The nominal fragment remains without a supplied subject or verb.
T79. The date range, weekdays, and first-person description remain one italic paragraph in Joubert’s voice, including D. G. on its wrapped source line. Great and good retain the paired adjectives without diagnosing the illness or explaining its benefit. Missing terminal punctuation after maladie is not supplied. The initials remain unexpanded.
T168. This is one italic author-circumstance paragraph between two horizontal rules, including the wrapped D. G. ; it is not reduced to a date heading or split into two main paragraphs. The date range and both weekdays are intact. The final e of maladie is partly clipped but identifiable; any following punctuation lies beyond the damaged right edge and is not restored. D. G. remains unexpanded.
T80. The paired nominal formulations and repeated gastric juices remain. The italic Latin Nota. is retained in both languages and means Note. Suited to making renders propres à faire without supplying a diet, diagnosis, or additional causal explanation.
T169. Estomach retains its final h , and alimens its printed ending; the latter word spans the line break without a supplied t . Nota. alone is italic. The nominal constructions and repeated sucs gastriques remain. The terminal punctuation is read as a period; the adjacent thin lower mark resembles the surrounding reproduction artifacts.
T81. The demonstrative nominal relative phrase remains without a main predicate. Goes to the heart retains its motion and emotional image without identifying a particular philosopher.
T170. The nominal relative formulation remains without a supplied main clause.
T82. The exhortation and repeated preserve and a little remain. Modesty and deference are separate, and others renders autrui without naming an authority.
T171. Modestie spans the line break; the surviving letters support the complete word. The conspicuous raised mark above the end of Conservons is an extraneous shape, not part of its letter sequence; no added letter or punctuation is inferred.
T83. The plural evils and goods remain broad; the second clause shares the first verb without repeating it. Alone restricts the will of God, while necessity and order remain distinct nouns. No philosophical system is supplied.
T172. The second clause retains its shared predicate without repetition. The e of de at the right edge is clipped but supported by its surviving stroke and read with that qualification. The two following source apparatus paragraphs remain attached to their separate earlier date calls, not to this closing entry.