How often in writing do we use in our work expressions suited to what ought to be there, but at odds with what is...
Ker-louche and Ker-borgne. And, on that subject, this ker must correspond to the Germanic her and be a title of honor.
In Plato. That eloquence which dispenses with all passions and has no need of them to triumph. That is the character of this great metaphysician.
One must read the books of the ancients like a dictionary, an encyclopedia of style in which one finds, in examples, the art of saying everything with delicacy, with good taste, with beauty. For they speak of everything in beautiful language, with a gentle accent.
But, by his own admission, Socrates made the young malicious and mocking. See what he says in the Apology.
March […]4.
And (in composition) at first the mind works only on these first apparitions, on certain phantoms formed by vapors that its first fire raises from it.
These maxims, the human race cut them out. My memory then does what the memory of others would do.
At the bottom of our mind there is another mind, at the bottom of our taste another taste.
Seven garments of the soul.
Expressions that have the fault of truly being expressions. Expressions by pressure.
My ideas! It is the house to lodge them in that costs me such effort to build.
Like the savor of air or that of light, or that of thought... That is what Plato offers good taste.
The need to speak supplied the orator with words. The need to write continually, colder and less pressing, supplies fewer and less lively ones.
1
The Notebooks of Joseph Joubert, Volume II · Book Mode · Diotimos