T3. The condition and singular a sentence preserve the first formulation’s phrase , distinct from plural phrases later in this same unit. Abridgments keeps the compression image without reducing it to a definition.
T22. Six independently indented paragraphs remain in one starred unit. The first has singular phrase , while the fourth paragraph’s related statement has plural phrases . All source prose is roman at the displayed level; no phrase is made italic from rhetorical importance. The first three Les mots openings are separate paragraphs. In paragraph 3 the rightmost ending after seu and the component after a recognizable capital D remain uncertified under the blur; seuls and De are contextual possibilities, not recovered text. Both substantial dashes remain. Transparens has no supplied t . Paragraph 4 retains all nominal subphrases inside its one paragraph. The right-edge traces do not certify the endings after souven , j’avo , son , l , premier and pou . A separate obscured slot after propre is marked without certifying à . These are reproduction qualifications, not grammatical repairs. The main-line suspends retains its visible d ; the later phrases /phrase distinction and all repeated mots /mémoire relations remain. The word beaucoup spans an ordinary line wrap with its two parts intact. Paragraph 5 retains the c’est construction with the following incomplete l -component and the obscured ending of mémoir ; no article or e is recovered from grammar. The subordinate relative relation implied by the previous paragraph is not supplied here. Paragraph 6 keeps both sans alternatives, the negative memory clause, the colon, prolixes , repeated papier and the separate substantial dash. Right-edge endings after puiss , aucun , périod and aprè remain unresolved. The compact designations provisionally read baseline Dt and Pt , with t -like shapes at the ordinary baseline; no name expansion or elevation is certified. The complete effet ending is retained at a qualified level. The source page is horizontally doubled and blur is worse toward the right gutter. Full-page and original-size crops support the readable central text. The independent structural reviewer has now read the complete page and the bounded right-edge/code crops, agreeing with these conservative limits and qualified compact forms; no missing endings are recovered.
T4. The plural bodies and singular outward place remain beside plural thoughts. The singular/plural mixture is not regularized, and the corporeal image is not replaced by a generic means of communication.
T5. The places/mirrors alternative, visibility relation and two importance fragments remain. The English [only ones] and [Of] contextually read incomplete seu[…] and D[…] , without restoring French endings. The distinction between words and thoughts is preserved rather than correcting either noun.
T6. All sound/sense, worth/importance and memory/oblivion distinctions remain. The initial imperfect auxiliary is read contextually as avois , giving the prior saying its past-perfect relation. Other English brackets mark contextual readings of souven[…] , the whole slot after propre , son[…] , l[…] , premier[…] and pou[…] ; no French endings are restored. The changing singular/plural sentence formulations and the self-correction to value remain. Of words takes the fragment’s opening Des with the following et de ceux relation, without a finite predicate. Their is ordinary English grammar for the value of the several sentences, not a recovered French possessive.
T7. The worse-than comparison and the agency of authors’ own care remain. The colon gives the identifying force of c’est in English. [The] and [memory] contextually render incomplete l[…] and mémoir[…] , leaving their French losses unchanged.
T8. Both without alternatives, the negative memory consequence, explicit prolixity and design/effect alternative remain. [Can], [any], [period] and [after] contextually read the incomplete words puiss[…] , aucun[…] , périod[…] and aprè[…] . Period is the rhetorical sentence structure, not a span of time. Dt and Pt remain opaque and provisionally at baseline; no names are supplied. The three amused faculties, present leaves and perfect has-flattered/has-passed sequence remain. Repeated paper and the final page-turning sound retain their material oddness without replacing it with an invented musical instrument.
T9. The two nominal Of constructions and the semicolon remain. Bracketed not contextually renders the damaged n[…] together with intact le sont pas ; the negative force is not wholly missing, since pas is legible. No French e is restored.
T23. Two separately indented nominal paragraphs belong to this one starred unit. Intéressans lacks a supplied t and eux mêmes remains spaced. The first semicolon is retained; the right edge certifies n but not the full following e before next-line le . No negative component is restored in French. The second paragraph keeps son/sens and bon sens/bon son in their printed order, with its semicolon and period. The final adjective and period are retained as qualified blurred readings; the feminine plural and accents are not inferred solely from agreement. Both paragraphs are roman.
T10. The reversed sound/sense order, both good formulations and the final participial fragment remain. Flattered preserves the sensory and attentive response without supplying a finite verb. The source adjective and terminal period retain their explicit reproduction qualification.
T11. The name and parenthetic Z remain unexpanded, at the source's qualified reading level. Speaks well of preserves parle bien de : favorable speech and skill in speaking about the dogmas remain possible, rather than identifying a particular doctrine or person.
T24. The one-line statement follows its own star. The opaque name is provisionally Delalot with plain first e ; the parenthetic letter has the two bars/diagonal of a capital Z . Neither name nor code is expanded or identified. The negative/positive doctrinal distinction is not normalized from a historical expectation. The name, compact Z , accents and terminal period remain qualified under the smear, with the independent bounded comparison now agreeing at that qualified level.
T12. The two dashes, initial infinitive, only restriction, can and something better remain. [Thus] contextually reads damaged Ains[…] without restoring its ending in French. English it repeats the previously named soul, the implicit object of the second softening. The ambition fragment and printed ellipsis remain unfinished. The roman reference retains the qualified Montrésor reading; no work or internal destination is identified.
T25. The initial and internal substantial dashes remain with the infinitival fragment, restrictive seul , subjunctive puissent and ordinary pro-/duire wrap. The final letter after Ains is not certified at the blurred right edge; no i is restored. The later nominal ambition fragment has a printed ellipsis, distinct from that current loss. The parenthetic reference is roman. Mémoires spans an intact ordinary line wrap; Montrésor and the terminal period before its close are provisional literal readings at the qualified level, not a work or person identification. The separate L’étude paragraph has no finite main predicate and ends in its own printed ellipsis. Its final accents are qualified. No source call or footnote is invented.
T13. The separate subject and participial phrase remain without a finite main predicate. The plural contemplations and printed ellipsis are retained; neither a missing object nor a conclusion is supplied.
T14. The imperfect was and compound-past has been remain distinct, as do usefulness and honorable conduct. Honorable takes honnête in its moral context, without identifying the deleted document. The opaque code and printed [Lalande] remain at their qualified facsimile reading level. These are source-editor brackets, not a present reproduction gap or an expansion supplied by this translation.
T26. The first negative clause has the visible imperfect n’étoit , while the second retains n’a pas été ; neither tense nor negative is reconciled with the other. The opaque baseline code provisionally reads L—L—nt— , with three substantial horizontal strokes. The printed bracketed name is provisionally [Lalande] , followed by a qualified semicolon; these brackets are source-editor text, not a current loss marker. The code, bracket contour and final name letters remain qualified, with independent bounded native comparison now agreeing at that qualified level, without expansion from historical context.