DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Bilingual Edition

Joseph Joubert

The Notebooks of Joseph Joubert, Volume I

Complete Notebooks · French with an independent English translation.

Explore the Lexicon
The Notebooks of Joseph Joubert, Volume I[LOCKE] · Entry 2310

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

English Page · Branch 2310 of 3781

[LOCKE] · Entry 2310

Book Mode

French

p. 4619

[LOCKE]

4 janvier.

Locke dit que nous ne connoissons que nos idées. Qu’est-ce que cela fait, pourvu que nos idées ressemblent à ce qu’elles nous représentent? Nous ne voyons ainsi que les images peintes dans la rétine de notre œil; mais si l’image ressemble à l’objet, qu’est-ce que cela fait? Et nous sommes assurés que l’image ressemble à l’objet lorsque...

Présomption en faveur des ressemblances : notre participation même à la divine intelligence.

« L’esprit (dit Locke) ne connoît pas immédiatement les choses, mais seulement par les idées qu’il en a. » Qu’est-ce que cela fait? Autant vaudroit dire qu’un soldat ne tue pas immédiatement son ennemi, mais seulement par l’intervention de l’action par laquelle il frappe.

Véhicules. Les mots sont des véhicules, des instrumens. Pourquoi ne les appellerois-je pas véhicules ou charriots, traîneaux, voitures.

Tous ces métaphysiciens prétendus n’aprennent rien qu’à ne rien croire en métaphysique et tout leur scavoir à eux même se bornoit là.

Il y a deux existences que l’homme enfermé dans lui-même pourroit connoître, la sienne et celle de Dieu : je pense, je suis, donc Dieu est. Mais la sensation seule peut lui apprendre celle des corps.

Idées claires — oui; — mais si notre esprit n’est pas net, s’il est faux, sujet à l’éblouissement..., la foi en ce cas vaut autant que la conviction. Et n’eût-elle aucun avantage pour la science et l’instruction, elle en auroit un immense pour la moralité universelle en maintenant les esprits inférieurs dans les sentimens de docilité et de subordination qui sont en eux une vertu, un devoir, un avantage, un moyen de repos à leur vie et une condition indispensable à leur bonheur et à la sorte de mérite dont ils peuvent se faire honneur.

L’utilité la plus assurée du sillogisme est d’être une espèce d’escrime qui délie l’esprit [de] ceux qu’on y exerce. La gymnastique.

Oui, mais ils disent que tout a existé de toute éternité. — Oui, mais l’intelligence? D’où? et, si de quelque part, donc...

Il n’y a que l’intelligence qui puisse évidemment démontrer l’intelligence.

On concevroit qu’un triangle eût été produit sans que l’intelligence y eût part. Un mouvement aveugle (ou fermentation fortuite) peut aller jusqu’à mettre en existence par hazard toutes les sortes de figures. L’Iliade pourroit sortir d’un jet fortuit de caractères, mais l’intelligence de l’Iliade ne le pourroit pas. (7 janvier.)

Quel est le père de l’esprit; et comme ces pères et ces mères de nos corps...

Il a produit la matière nécessairement et par son existence; et le monde volontairement et par sa bonté.

4619

The Notebooks of Joseph Joubert, Volume I: [LOCKE]

p. 4620

[LOCKE]

January 4.

Locke says that we know only our ideas. What does that matter, provided our ideas resemble what they represent to us? In the same way, we see only the images painted in the retina of our eye; but if the image resembles the object, what does that matter? And we are assured that the image resembles the object when...

Presumption in favor of resemblances: our very participation in divine intelligence.

“The mind (says Locke) does not know things immediately, but only through the ideas it has of them.” What does that matter? One might as well say that a soldier does not kill his enemy immediately, but only through the intervention of the action by which he strikes.

Vehicles. Words are vehicles, instruments. Why should I not call them vehicles or carts, sleds, carriages.

All these so-called metaphysicians teach nothing but to believe nothing in metaphysics, and all their own knowledge was confined to that.

There are two existences that a man shut within himself could know, his own and God’s: I think, I am, therefore God is. But sensation alone can teach him the existence of bodies.

Clear ideas—yes;—but if our mind is not lucid, if it is unsound, liable to be dazzled..., faith in that case is worth as much as conviction. And even if it had no advantage for science and instruction, it would have an immense one for universal morality, by maintaining inferior minds in the feelings of docility and subordination that are in them a virtue, a duty, an advantage, a means of repose for their lives, and an indispensable condition of their happiness and of the kind of merit in which they can take pride.

The surest use of the syllogism is to be a kind of fencing that makes supple the minds [of] those trained in it. Gymnastics.

Yes, but they say that everything has existed from all eternity. — Yes, but intelligence? From where? and, if from somewhere, then...

Only intelligence can clearly demonstrate intelligence.

One could conceive of a triangle having been produced without intelligence taking part in it. A blind movement (or fortuitous fermentation) can go so far as to bring every kind of figure into existence by chance. The Iliad could emerge from a chance scattering of letters, but the understanding of the Iliad could not. (January 7.)

Who is the father of the mind; and like these fathers and these mothers of our bodies...

He produced matter necessarily and through his existence; and the world voluntarily and through his goodness.

4620

About This Reading Edition

Joubert’s notebooks return to the work of thinking and writing, the demands of friendship, and questions of faith, beauty and conduct. This edition pairs the French with a new English translation, preserving the order of the chosen source and the unfinished character of its fragments. Dates and source references allow readers to follow a thought through time or return to its printed context.

Historical Text and Translation

The French text follows André Beaunier’s 1938 edition of Les Carnets de Joseph Joubert, published by Gallimard from Joubert’s autograph manuscripts. Volume I presents the entries on printed pages 32–475. French and English are aligned paragraph by paragraph, retaining the source order, printed dates and page references so readers can return to the facsimile.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared this new English translation directly from the French, preserving Joubert’s distinctions, recurring images, ambiguities and unfinished thoughts. Translator’s notes clarify wording, references and uncertain readings: Essential keeps notes that help explain a passage, while All includes technical detail. Annotations from the 1938 source edition remain distinct from the new translator’s notes.

Rights

The linked facsimile records identify the French source as public domain in the United States. The new English translation and editorial notes are © 2026 Diotimos, with source annotations and new editorial contributions credited separately. This edition pairs the complete French notebooks with an independent English translation, preserving the distinction between Joubert’s text and its accompanying notes.