When a saint—I do not know which—said: “I believe it because it is absurd,” the saying has a meaning; it means that faith can have as its matter only what is incomprehensible. But here it is sheer unreasoning by rules, principles, and with art.
— And he is sometimes harsher than all the theologians together. (See page 96.)
Page 98, first lines. “God forbids atheism.” That is ridiculous and very ridiculous.
... Page 111. O fanatic for nobility!
So that they are born with the duty of being Kings in perpetuity, and those who prevent them from fulfilling that duty are guilty in perpetuity. But if there is transmission of a name and not transmission of blood,—for no mortal until now, (says the Odyssey)... And Boileau’s satire to M. Dangeau.
Society [exists] through and for individuals, and not individuals for and solely with a view to society.
Poets have a hundred times more good sense than philosophers, and the former, seeking the beautiful, encounter more truths than the latter, seeking the true.
Page 127. What inappropriate language and what abuse of the word love, an abuse that is even dangerous!—And to what ridicule all this lends itself!
Ibid., at the end. To start from a definition and substitute abstraction for reality when the object is before one’s eyes is ridiculous.
China, which, according to the author, is not constituted or is only little constituted, has persisted in its present state for a time almost as ancient as the earliest periods of our civil history in the West.
Page 129. It is impossible to talk nonsense with more phlegm, method, and even enlightenment.
All these words, constituted and constitution, have had from their origin in France an obscurity that will always remain with them. And for a word to be clear, it is not even enough to define its meaning exactly; its sound would also have to recall its meaning readily to the mind, which happens only when there are customary words in the language (and in daily use) whose sound and meaning have affinities with the first that strike one at once.
Page 138. “Love of God and men, which cannot exist in societies that are not constituted.” What an arbitrary use of words!
* A kind of strength of mind that results in an incredible perseverance in deceiving oneself. Happy those to whom heaven has not given it!
A petty nobleman of much intelligence and much learning, erecting his various prejudices into doctrine.
Jewish people—bristling with qualities that repelled (as the thistle is with thorns), so that it would not mingle etc.
Page 149. That is an unreason that makes one shudder despite oneself. O reasoners!
But, reasoner, if in reasoning there is a necessary impossibility, that is, one deriving from the very nature of beings, that man should be God or that God could become man... You should have sought your reasons elsewhere. Those you put forward, to speak your language, may scandalize the weak.
* A strength that makes the mind deceive itself with an imperturbable perseverance, as another strength makes a man do evil with an incorrigible boldness.
* He is the Dupuis of Christianity.
Pages 165 and 166. Here the author philosophizes.
March 20.
The mind is like the steed of which Horace said: Cui male si palpere recalcitrat undique tutus. One must know how to handle it.
* With what strength he deceives himself!!
Page 192. O singular conclusion! One seems to tumble into it down a breakneck passage, and the mind feels something in it dislocated.
* But on that reckoning, constituted society, as he calls it, is impeccable.
Page 215. Gift. But anything in which the will has no part is not a gift.
* Why does he not make literature a social profession? Because he judges it useless.
* Therefore. All his therefores try one’s patience and make one want to contradict him.
* In all this there is only the posture and insistence of a man making emphatic assertions.
Page 120. But this gift, what does it cost him? In giving it, what does he deprive himself of, and what does he give that is his?
He always starts from what he calls his principles as though he were starting from the reader’s, with the same assurance... It makes good sense shudder.
March 21.
Certainly he is not mad, but he has been driven mad.
Page 234. He reels off all he has to say.
* Water as well as wine. Very well observed.
* In the confinement and darkness of the study. Truly there is etc.—that one never wrote in the sun (and while walking).
* Let the laws be alike, so be it. But the systems of civil administration!
* Literature. It is in power, but has never been a constituted power.
Page 260. [Does] Mohammedanism not have the sacrifice of almsgiving, that of fasting, of pilgrimage, of the tithe in certain cases?
Id. So little philosophy that it is all revelation.
1
The Notebooks of Joseph Joubert, Volume I · Book Mode · Diotimos