Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I
Proem and Books I–IV · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Latin Page · Branch 97 of 174
Book II · Chapter 11 · §§ 29–32
Latin
p. 196At quicquid est, hoc habet, ut et absens bonum appetat et in praesenti bono libentissime conquiescat. Profecto natura, sensus, intellectus absens bonum appetit, praesens amplectitur. Totum hoc natura sensus expers per inclinationem quandam facit, sensus per appetitum, intellectus per voluntatem.
Ergo cum Deus sit, ut Peripatetico more loquar, ens primum, quis divinum intellectum negabit praesens bonum suum, quod est omne bonum, per voluntatem libenter amplecti? Sicut enim in sua veritate videt omnia vera quae ipsa illuminante fiunt vera, ita in sua bonitate vult bona omnia quae et ipsius propagatione nascuntur et ipsa perficiente fiunt bona. Mens autem quaelibet volendo facit opera potius quam videndo. Videndo enim replicat formas intus; volendo eas explicat extra. Videndo respicit verum, cui propria puritas est; volendo attingit bonum, cui propria est diffusio.
Tertia ratio. Sensus intellectusque ipsius cognitio, quia tamquam imaginarium quiddam in creaturis est, nullum substantialem effectum efficit nisi per affectum, quod essentiale quiddam esse videtur; unde quanto vehementius afficit, tanto potentius operatur. Quod quidem indicat quodammodo struthii oculus avidissime intentus in ovum.
Si intelligentia Dei in creando efficacior est quam struthii intuitus in fovendo, immo si immensae est efficaciae, quod patet ex eo quod nec subiecto neque instrumento neque tempore indiget in creando, coniectari possumus voluntatis affectum esse in divina intelligentia potentissimum. Adde et iucundissimum, si modo intelligentia quae perfectissima est, quaeve integerrimo et perfectissimo obiecto semper et undique fruitur, suavissima esse debet.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I: Book II
p. 197But whatever exists has this property: it seeks a good that is absent and rests with the greatest delight in a good that is present. Nature, sensation, and intellect plainly seek an absent good and embrace one that is present. Nature devoid of sensation does all this through a certain inclination, sensation through appetite, and intellect through will.
Therefore, since God is—to speak in the Peripatetic manner—the first being, who will deny that the divine intellect freely embraces through will its present good, which is every good? Just as in his truth he sees all true things, which become true by its illumination, so in his goodness he wills all good things, which arise through its propagation and become good through its perfecting them. Every mind, moreover, produces works by willing rather than by seeing. In seeing it folds forms inward; in willing it unfolds them outward. In seeing it looks to truth, whose proper character is purity; in willing it reaches the good, whose proper character is diffusion.
Third argument. The cognition belonging to sense and even to intellect itself, because it is like something imaginary in created things, produces no substantial effect except through affect, which seems to be something essential. Hence the more vehemently it affects, the more powerfully it acts. This is indicated in a certain way by the eye of the ostrich fixed most avidly upon its egg.
If God's intelligence in creating is more efficacious than the ostrich's gaze in brooding—and indeed if it is of immeasurable efficacy, as is clear because it needs neither a subject, an instrument, nor time in creating—we can infer that the affection of will is most powerful in the divine intelligence. Add that this affection is also most delightful, if indeed the most perfect intelligence, which always and everywhere enjoys the most complete and perfect object, must be the most delightful.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I · Book II · II.11.29–II.11.32
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology places the immortality of the soul at the center of an extended philosophical ascent through body, soul, angel, and God. This exact page-aligned Renaissance edition presents the authorial Proem and Books I–IV in a newly established Latin reading text with an independent English translation prepared by Diotimos Editions.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is based on the Florence editio princeps printed by Antonio Miscomini on 7 November 1482 and principally collated against the Paris 1559 printing, with a 1641 Opera printing used only as a late control and OCR aid. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and substantive departures among the witnesses are documented in the edition’s apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independently worded English translation in house. It aims for a dignified but readable modern register while preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purpose clauses, and direct appeals; long periods are divided only where clarity requires it.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.