Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I
Proem and Books I–IV · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
English Page · Branch 53 of 174
Book II · Chapter 2 · §§ 7–8
Latin
p. 108Unus ergo est Deus et simplex, nempe una summa unitas, una summa veritas atque bonitas: Deus unus. Unus, inquam, apud Platonicos triplici ratione. Primo, quia summa est unitas. Nam si quodlibet summum est unicum, quid magis unicum est quam summa unitas? Propria quaelibet rerum innumerabilium multitudo ad propriam redigitur unitatem: multitudo innumerabilium hominum ad unam humanam speciem, equorum ad unam equinam, similiter aliorum. Accipe deinde omnes proprias unitates quae certo sunt numero terminatae, id est rerum species, easque ad unam communem collige unitatem, scilicet Deum principem specierum.
Ut sicut multitudines singularium infinitae ad finitas unitates specierum, sic unitates specierum finitae ad unicam super species unitatem referantur. Par est ut, sicut proprius quisque rerum ordo ad proprium sui principium unum dirigitur, sic universus ordo rerum ad unum referatur universale principium. Et sicut singulae materiae ad materiam unam, omnia membra mundi ad unum corpus, sic omnes mundi naturae ad naturam unam, omnes mundi vitae ad unam vitam, omnes motus ad unum motum, omnes motores ad unum mundi motorem. Porro quando plura quaedam et inter se secundum naturam diversa ordine quodam uno mutuoque conspirant, necessarium est ut ordo huiusmodi in illis sit propter ordinem quem ad unum aliquid habeant, qualis est ordo partium exercitus invicem, qui est propter ordinem totius exercitus ad ducem unum. Nam quod aliqua quae diversa inter se sunt nanciscantur hoc, ut communione mutua uniantur, non provenit ex propriis eorum naturis, per quas sunt diversa; nam ex iis potius disiunguntur. Neque etiam provenit ex diversis quibusdam ordinatoribus. Hi sane per naturas eorum discrepantes, prout discrepant, ad unum ordinem non incumbunt. Atque ita ordo ille plurium mutuus vel casu obtigit vel ab uno ac primo ordinatore est institutus ad unum finem omnia dirigente.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I: Book II
p. 109God is therefore one and simple: namely, one supreme unity, one supreme truth and goodness—the one God. One, I say, for the Platonists in three respects. First, because he is supreme unity. For if everything supreme is unique, what is more unique than supreme unity? Every particular multitude of innumerable things is reduced to its own unity: the multitude of innumerable human beings to one human species, that of horses to one equine species, and similarly with the rest. Next take all the particular unities which are bounded by a determinate number—that is, the species of things—and gather them into one common unity, namely God, the sovereign of species.
This is so that, just as the infinite multitudes of individuals are referred to the finite unities of species, so the finite unities of species may be referred to the single unity above species. It is fitting that, just as each particular order of things is directed to its own single principle, so the universal order of things should be referred to one universal principle. And just as particular matters are referred to one matter, and all the members of the world to one body, so all the natures of the world are referred to one nature, all its lives to one life, all motions to one motion, and all movers to one mover of the world. Further, whenever several things diverse from one another in nature conspire in a certain single and mutual order, that order must be in them because of the order they bear to some one thing. Such is the mutual order of the parts of an army, which exists because the whole army is ordered to one commander. The fact that things diverse from one another acquire this—that they are united by mutual communion—does not arise from their proper natures, through which they are diverse; for by those they are rather divided. Nor does it arise from several diverse arrangers. Such arrangers, precisely through their discrepant natures and insofar as they differ, do not tend toward one order. Thus the mutual order of the many either came about by chance or was instituted by one first arranger directing all things to one end.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I · Book II · II.2.7–II.2.8
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology places the immortality of the soul at the center of an extended philosophical ascent through body, soul, angel, and God. This exact page-aligned Renaissance edition presents the authorial Proem and Books I–IV in a newly established Latin reading text with an independent English translation prepared by Diotimos Editions.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is based on the Florence editio princeps printed by Antonio Miscomini on 7 November 1482 and principally collated against the Paris 1559 printing, with a 1641 Opera printing used only as a late control and OCR aid. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and substantive departures among the witnesses are documented in the edition’s apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independently worded English translation in house. It aims for a dignified but readable modern register while preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purpose clauses, and direct appeals; long periods are divided only where clarity requires it.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.