Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I
Proem and Books I–IV · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Latin Page · Branch 35 of 174
Book I · Chapter 5 · §§ 17–18
Latin
p. 72Mens ipsa, quia per intelligentiam et voluntatem non necessario dependet a corpore et naturaliter formas separat atque circa separatas versatur et quiete potius quam motu proficit, per naturam est a corpore motuque libera. Idcirco magis naturae suae convenit ut vivat seorsum a corpore motuque quam ut vivat in corpore atque motu. Multae tamen mentes in corporibus mobilem vitam ducunt. Quare multo magis et multo plures immobilem vitam agunt absque corporibus. Quis neget incorporeae substantiae secundum generis sui naturam convenire magis ut extra corpus sit quam ut in corpore, ideoque plures illius species a corpore seiunctas quam coniunctas esse debere? Quod enim generi cuilibet naturalius est, id in eo exsistit ut plurimum.
Tales quidem sunt angeli, qui si corpora mundi movent, ipsi motis corporibus nullo modo moventur. Animae tamen dum corpora transferunt, ipsae quoque feruntur. Motor qui una cum moto corpore pervagatur perpetuum stabilemque tenorem et ordinem movendi non servat nisi praesit illi motor immobilis. Ideo mundanae revolutionis perpetuus ordo testatur esse aliquos super animas motores immobiles. Elementa quoniam ex fluitante materia constant seque mutuo semper inficiunt nullum ex se ordinem observarent nisi a lege caelestis motus ordinatissima regerentur. Cum vero et caelum per se sit perpetuo mobile ideoque indigum, ordo in suo motu stabilis non ex ipso provenit, sed a superno motore prorsus immobili atque individuo. Non enim in rebus tam diversis mobilibusque stabilis unio perseverat nisi a stabilissimo et unitissimo cardine, qui tandem ad unitatem ipsam statumque refertur. Sane sicut mobile se habet ad mobile, ita motor etiam ad motorem. Ergo sicut elementum quod movetur mobiliter ad caelum quod movetur stabiliter, sic motor caeli mobilis variusque ad motorem stabilem unitumque; stabile denique et unitum ad statum ipsum unitatemque reducitur.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I: Book I
p. 73Mind itself does not necessarily depend on a body in its understanding and will; it naturally abstracts forms, occupies itself with forms so abstracted, and advances through rest rather than motion. It is therefore free by nature from body and motion. Hence it accords better with its nature to live apart from body and motion than to live in body and motion. Many minds nevertheless lead a mobile life in bodies. All the more, then—and in far greater numbers—do minds live an immobile life without bodies. Who would deny that it accords better with the nature of the incorporeal kind for an incorporeal substance to exist outside a body than within one, and therefore that more of its species should be separate from body than conjoined to it? For whatever is more natural to any kind is found in it in the greatest abundance.
Such, indeed, are angels: if they move the bodies of the world, they themselves are in no way moved when those bodies move. Souls, by contrast, are themselves carried along while they convey bodies from place to place. A mover that ranges together with a moving body does not preserve an everlasting, stable course and order of motion unless an immobile mover presides over it. The perpetual order of the world's revolution therefore testifies that there are immobile movers above souls. Because the elements consist of fluctuating matter and constantly affect one another, they would preserve no order of themselves unless they were ruled by the supremely ordered law of celestial motion. And since heaven is of itself perpetually mobile and therefore needy, the stable order in its motion does not come from itself but from a higher mover, wholly immobile and indivisible. For among things so diverse and mobile, no stable union endures unless it comes from a supremely stable and unified pivot, which is referred in the end to unity itself and to stability. Indeed, as one mobile thing stands in relation to another, so one mover stands in relation to another. Thus an element, which is moved changeably, is related to heaven, which is moved stably; in the same way heaven's mobile and varying mover is related to a stable and unified mover; and what is stable and unified is finally reduced to stability and unity themselves.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I · Book I · I.5.17–I.5.18
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology places the immortality of the soul at the center of an extended philosophical ascent through body, soul, angel, and God. This exact page-aligned Renaissance edition presents the authorial Proem and Books I–IV in a newly established Latin reading text with an independent English translation prepared by Diotimos Editions.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is based on the Florence editio princeps printed by Antonio Miscomini on 7 November 1482 and principally collated against the Paris 1559 printing, with a 1641 Opera printing used only as a late control and OCR aid. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and substantive departures among the witnesses are documented in the edition’s apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independently worded English translation in house. It aims for a dignified but readable modern register while preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purpose clauses, and direct appeals; long periods are divided only where clarity requires it.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.