Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I
Proem and Books I–IV · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Latin Page · Branch 34 of 174
Book I · Chapter 5 · §§ 15–16
Latin
p. 70Quoniam, ut alias ostendemus, rationales animae inter aeternitatem tempusque sunt constitutae. Aeternitatis vero excellentia videtur exigere ut plures in ea quodammodo species perfectionesque quam in tempore sint. Mitto, quod alias demonstrabimus, intervallum inter animas primumque principium infinitum esse, sed spatium inter ipsas atque materiam esse finitum, ut nemini mirum videri debeat super animas plures admodum angelorum gradus quam gradus formarum infra animas esse posse.
Praeterea quando ex duobus fit unum et alterum illorum quod minus perfectum est reperitur alicubi per se manere seorsum ab altero, multo magis alterum illud perfectius et minus egenum esse alicubi sine altero poterit. Fit autem animal unum ex intellectuali substantia, id est anima rationali, et corpore. Corpora multa videmus sine huiusmodi intellectu esse ac vivere. Quid igitur prohibet esse mentes plurimas corporibus non unitas? Tales quidem erunt super animas quae sunt unitae corporibus. Proinde mentes coniunctae corporibus, quatenus tales sunt, speciem animalis solae non complent, sed compositae speciei sunt partes, atque, ut plurimum, ut intelligant in ea quae sensibilia sunt aspiciunt. Quare et imperfectae quodammodo sunt et imperfecte agunt. Si igitur ab imperfectis in quolibet genere ad perfecta quae priora natura sunt est ascendendum, consequens est ut super coniunctas mentes ad separatas ratio nos perducat, quae et species ipsae sufficienter suas compleant et intelligendo ad illa quae per se intelligibilia sunt aspiciant.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I: Book I
p. 71For, as we shall show elsewhere, rational souls are situated between eternity and time. The excellence of eternity seems to demand that there be, in some sense, more species and perfections within it than there are in time. I pass over what we shall demonstrate elsewhere: that the interval between souls and the first principle is infinite, while the space between souls and matter is finite. No one, therefore, should find it surprising that there can be a great many more ranks of angels above souls than ranks of forms beneath them.
Moreover, whenever one thing is made from two, and the less perfect of the two is found somewhere to remain by itself apart from the other, all the more can the other, more perfect and less needy, exist somewhere without the first. Now a single living creature is made from an intellectual substance—that is, a rational soul—and a body. We see many bodies existing and living without an intellect of this kind. What, then, prevents there being very many minds not united to bodies? Such minds will indeed stand above souls that are united to bodies. Minds joined to bodies, insofar as they are such, do not by themselves complete the species of a living creature, but are parts of a composite species; and, for the most part, in order to understand, they look toward sensible things. They are therefore imperfect in a certain sense and act imperfectly. If, then, we must ascend in every kind from imperfect things to the perfect things that are prior by nature, it follows that reason must lead us above conjoined minds to separate minds, which themselves fully complete their own species and, in understanding, look toward things intelligible in themselves.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I · Book I · I.5.15–I.5.16
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology places the immortality of the soul at the center of an extended philosophical ascent through body, soul, angel, and God. This exact page-aligned Renaissance edition presents the authorial Proem and Books I–IV in a newly established Latin reading text with an independent English translation prepared by Diotimos Editions.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is based on the Florence editio princeps printed by Antonio Miscomini on 7 November 1482 and principally collated against the Paris 1559 printing, with a 1641 Opera printing used only as a late control and OCR aid. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and substantive departures among the witnesses are documented in the edition’s apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independently worded English translation in house. It aims for a dignified but readable modern register while preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purpose clauses, and direct appeals; long periods are divided only where clarity requires it.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.