Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I
Proem and Books I–IV · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Latin Page · Branch 33 of 174
Book I · Chapter 5 · § 14
Latin
p. 68Merito sicut animae caput est mens haec, pars eius excellentissima, sic mentis huius, quae non sui ipsius est sed animae, non absoluta sed ad animae huius tracta capacitatem, non clara sed obscura et quodammodo dubia, huius, inquam, mentis caput est mens quaedam quae in se ipsa est, liberaque et lucida. In quo sane illud Magorum enodatur enigma: ‘Est res undique lucida. Est res undique obscura. Est media lucida partim partimque obscura.’ In ordine corporum res undique lucida est stella quaelibet super lunam; obscurus undique est aer; media luna. In ordine vero spirituum mens est lumine plena; anima irrationalis vacua; rationalis tenet medium. Partem habet intellectualis luminis, parte caret. Ac partem quam habet a Deo, ceu luna a sole, aliter accipit, mutatque figuram. Ideo merito super eam est angelus, qui tanquam stella quaelibet super lunam et totus semper et eodem pacto sui solis luce refulget. Profecto ubi natura superior tangit inferiorem, ibi ex infimo sui gradu supremum inferioris attingit. Puta infimum ignis aeris attingit supremum. Natura vero intellectualis corporali est natura superior, tangitque illam adeo ut quod inter corpora praestantissimum est intellectualis sit animae particeps; inferiora vero, quae plurima sunt, nequaquam. Praestantissima vero corpora sunt apud Platonicos caelicolarum, daemonumque et hominum. Sed nunquid mentes quae corporibus huiusmodi tributae sunt mentium altissimae sunt? Nequaquam. Alioquin natura inferior superioris absque medio summum consequeretur. Ergo quemadmodum sub corporibus mente praeditis quam plurima corpora sunt expertia mentis, ita super mentes corporibus insitas quam plurimae mentes sunt nullis attributae corporibus, atque etiam multo plures sunt quam corporum species.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I: Book I
p. 69Fittingly, just as this mind, the soul's most excellent part, is the head of the soul, so this mind—which is not its own but the soul's, not absolute but contracted to the capacity of this soul, not clear but obscure and in some way doubtful—has as its head a certain mind which exists in itself, free and lucid. Here the riddle of the Magi is truly unraveled: ‘There is a thing lucid on every side. There is a thing obscure on every side. There is a middle thing, partly lucid and partly obscure.’ In the order of bodies, every star above the moon is lucid on every side; the air is obscure on every side; and the moon is intermediate. In the order of spirits, mind is full of light; the irrational soul is empty of it; and the rational soul holds the middle place. It possesses a share of intellectual light and lacks a share. The portion it has from God, as the moon has from the sun, it receives in a different manner and changes its form. Hence an angel fittingly stands above it: like every star above the moon, the angel shines in its entirety, always and in the same manner, with the light of its sun. Indeed, wherever a higher nature touches a lower one, it touches the highest point of the lower from the lowest degree of itself. Thus the lowest part of fire touches the highest part of air. Intellectual nature is higher than corporeal nature, and it touches the latter in such a way that what is most excellent among bodies participates in an intellectual soul, while the lower bodies, which are very many, do not. Among the Platonists the most excellent bodies are those of the inhabitants of heaven, of daemons, and of human beings. But are the minds allotted to bodies of this kind the highest of minds? By no means. Otherwise a lower nature would attain the summit of a higher nature without an intermediary. Therefore, just as beneath bodies endowed with mind there are very many bodies devoid of mind, so above minds implanted in bodies there are very many minds allotted to no bodies at all—and indeed far more of them than there are species of bodies.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I · Book I · I.5.14
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology places the immortality of the soul at the center of an extended philosophical ascent through body, soul, angel, and God. This exact page-aligned Renaissance edition presents the authorial Proem and Books I–IV in a newly established Latin reading text with an independent English translation prepared by Diotimos Editions.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is based on the Florence editio princeps printed by Antonio Miscomini on 7 November 1482 and principally collated against the Paris 1559 printing, with a 1641 Opera printing used only as a late control and OCR aid. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and substantive departures among the witnesses are documented in the edition’s apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independently worded English translation in house. It aims for a dignified but readable modern register while preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purpose clauses, and direct appeals; long periods are divided only where clarity requires it.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.