Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I
Proem and Books I–IV · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Latin Page · Branch 25 of 174
Book I · Chapter 3 · §§ 32–33
Latin
p. 52Praesertim cum oporteat principium rerum vi sua sempiternum fuisse et fore. Fuisse quidem semper, nam neque potuit ex se aliquando prodiisse: fuisset enim ipsum ante se ipsum; neque ex alio: nihil enim ante primum. Reliqua vero non essent unquam nisi prius fuisset primum. Fore quoque semper, quoniam extincto principio corruunt universa, neque ipsum amplius neque aliud quicquam renasci potest. Habeat ergo necesse est vim infinitam, per quam ex se infinite vivat. Hanc non habebit, si fuerit corporale. Nam si dimensiones habuerit infinitas, nihil erit in rebus aliud praeter ipsum. Si finitas, vim quoque finitam habebit. Mitto quod alias ostendemus, neque corpus neque corpoream formam, et indigam et mutabilem, sufficiens motionis principium esse posse, sed omne corporeum ab alio agitari; atque opificem qui opificio miscetur inficiturque non posse operi dominari, opificemque esse perfectum primumve mundani operis architectum.
Ergo formam corpoream transcendamus et consideremus nunc primam quae deinceps occurrit. Ut sicut a corpore tanquam infimo ascendimus ad formam corpoream quasi mediam, quia habet corporis aliquid dum dilatatur in corpore, aliquid vero non habet, siquidem ipsa non est aliquid ex materia et forma compositum; ita nunc ab hoc medio ad formam sublimiorem incorpoream, scilicet, provehamur, quae nihil habeat corporis, quae corporibus distribuat qualitates. Quae quoniam per se subsistit, vera forma et essentia nominatur, tertia, inquam, essentia, quam etiam suo loco rationalem animam appellabimus, quam ita irrationalis anima comitatur ut corpus umbra. Essentia illa et vera et immortalis a Platonicis ideo iudicatur, quia neque partibus indiget in quas aliquando dissolvi possit et per quas dispersa virtus debilitetur; neque subiecto adstringitur a quo deserta aliquando evanescat; neque contrariae formae miscetur qua infici possit; neque vel loco clauditur vel tempori vel motui, ob individuam et in se manentem simplicitatem substantiae, subest.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I: Book I
p. 53This is especially so because the principle of things must by its own power have existed and continue to exist eternally. It must always have existed, for it could not at some time have proceeded from itself, since it would then have existed before itself; nor could it have proceeded from another, since nothing is before the first. Other things, however, would never have existed unless the first had existed beforehand. It must also always continue to exist, since if the principle is extinguished, all things collapse, and neither it nor anything else can ever arise again. It must therefore possess infinite power, through which it lives infinitely from itself. It will not possess this power if it is corporeal. For if it has infinite dimensions, nothing else will exist among things besides it; if finite dimensions, it will also have finite power. I pass over what we shall show elsewhere: neither a body nor a corporeal form, needy and mutable as it is, can be a sufficient principle of motion, but everything corporeal is moved by another; and an artisan who is mingled with and tainted by the thing made cannot rule the work, nor be a perfect artisan or the first architect of the world's fabric.
Let us therefore transcend corporeal form and now consider the first form that next presents itself. Just as from body, as the lowest thing, we ascended to corporeal form as an intermediate—because it possesses something of body insofar as it is spread through body, yet does not possess something else of body, since it is not itself a composite of matter and form—so now let us advance from this intermediate to a higher, namely incorporeal, form, which possesses nothing of body and distributes qualities to bodies. Since it subsists through itself, it is named true form and essence—the third essence, I say—which in its proper place we shall also call the rational soul, accompanied by the irrational soul as a shadow accompanies a body. That essence is judged by the Platonists to be both true and immortal because it does not need parts into which it might someday be dissolved and through which its dispersed power might be weakened; it is not bound to a subject whose loss might cause it someday to vanish; it is not mixed with a contrary form by which it might be corrupted; and, because of the indivisible simplicity of its substance, which remains in itself, it is neither enclosed by place nor subject to time or motion.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I · Book I · I.3.32–I.3.33
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology places the immortality of the soul at the center of an extended philosophical ascent through body, soul, angel, and God. This exact page-aligned Renaissance edition presents the authorial Proem and Books I–IV in a newly established Latin reading text with an independent English translation prepared by Diotimos Editions.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is based on the Florence editio princeps printed by Antonio Miscomini on 7 November 1482 and principally collated against the Paris 1559 printing, with a 1641 Opera printing used only as a late control and OCR aid. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and substantive departures among the witnesses are documented in the edition’s apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independently worded English translation in house. It aims for a dignified but readable modern register while preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purpose clauses, and direct appeals; long periods are divided only where clarity requires it.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.