DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition

Marsilio Ficino

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I

Proem and Books I–IV · Latin with an independent English translation

Explore the Lexicon
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume IBook IV · Chapter 2 · §§ 19–20

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

Latin Page · Branch 171 of 174

Book IV · Chapter 2 · §§ 19–20

Book Mode

Latin

p. 344

Quod si et levis aura pulverem agitat et ventus inclusus terrae visceribus quassat montes, miraberis sublimes animas tenuissima corpora nutu levissimo volvere? Praesertim cum ea circa naturalem cardinem et in ambitu proprio moveant, atque ipsa ad motum huiusmodi naturali instinctu magis conducant quam terrenum corpus ad descensum quando anima nostra corpus suum per declivia ducit. Profecto caeli corpus ita aeque se habet et facile ad quemlibet situm circa centrum sicut elementalis materia ad quamlibet formam, immo vero multo magis. Proinde sicut animae convenit efficacia ad movendum, ita corpori proclivitas ad moveri. Corpus enim quoniam ab actu fit, in actu est, ad actum dirigitur, idcirco naturam habet ut per formas suas semper exerceatur. Quoniam vero et substantiam et qualitatem divisibilem habet, cogitur quicquid aut agit aut patitur secundum modum divisibilem, id est secundum motum, agere atque pati.

Confert autem caelestium motus eiusque varietas ad generationem generandarumque rerum diversitatem. Variis enim figuris caelum exornat, caelestesque vires vehementius in elementa transmittit. Movet elementa cogitque ut multis invicem modis commisceantur, eorumque globum undique vicissitudine quadam aeque illustrat et fovet. Praeterea ipsa mundi materia neque omnes simul in caelo figuras neque formas sub caelo omnes simul potest habere, siquidem inter se multae contrariae sunt, ubique tamen appetit omnes tamquam naturae suae perfectiones. Hinc ad sempiternum motum proclivis efficitur, ut quod non potest statu consequi successione saltem quodammodo consequatur. Verum cur in circulum maxime sphaerae rotantur? Quamvis id modo significaverim, altius tamen exordiamur.

344

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I: Book IV

p. 345

If even a light breeze stirs the dust, and wind enclosed within the entrails of the earth shakes mountains, will you marvel that sublime souls turn the most subtle bodies with the slightest command? This is especially so because they move those bodies about their natural axis and within their proper circuit, and because the bodies themselves are more inclined by natural instinct toward such motion than an earthly body is toward descent when our soul guides its body down a slope. Heaven's body is disposed with such perfect balance and ease toward any position about the center as elemental matter is toward any form—indeed, far more so. Thus, as efficacy in moving belongs to soul, so readiness to be moved belongs to body. Since body is made by actuality, exists in actuality, and is directed toward actuality, its nature is to be exercised continually through its forms. And because both its substance and quality are divisible, whatever it does or undergoes must be done or undergone in a divisible manner—that is, through motion.

The motion of the heavens and its variety contribute to generation and to the diversity of things that are generated. This motion adorns heaven with changing configurations and transmits the heavenly powers more forcefully into the elements. It moves the elements and compels them to mingle with one another in many ways, while by a certain alternation it equally illumines and nourishes their globe on every side. Moreover, the matter of the world cannot possess at once either all the configurations in heaven or all the forms beneath heaven, since many are contrary to one another. Yet everywhere it desires them all as perfections of its nature. It is therefore made prone to everlasting motion, so that what it cannot attain in a state of rest it may at least attain in some measure through succession. But why do the spheres revolve chiefly in a circle? Although I have just indicated the reason, let us begin again from a higher principle.

345

About This Reading Edition

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology places the immortality of the soul at the center of an extended philosophical ascent through body, soul, angel, and God. This exact page-aligned Renaissance edition presents the authorial Proem and Books I–IV in a newly established Latin reading text with an independent English translation prepared by Diotimos Editions.

Discussion Questions

Historical Text and Translation

The Latin reading text is based on the Florence editio princeps printed by Antonio Miscomini on 7 November 1482 and principally collated against the Paris 1559 printing, with a 1641 Opera printing used only as a late control and OCR aid. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and substantive departures among the witnesses are documented in the edition’s apparatus.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared this independently worded English translation in house. It aims for a dignified but readable modern register while preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purpose clauses, and direct appeals; long periods are divided only where clarity requires it.

Rights

Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.