DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition

Marsilio Ficino

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I

Proem and Books I–IV · Latin with an independent English translation

Explore the Lexicon
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume IBook III · Chapter 1 · §§ 26–27

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

Latin Page · Branch 127 of 174

Book III · Chapter 1 · §§ 26–27

Book Mode

Latin

p. 256

Sed motor ille qui proxime praecedit corpora quae moventur ab alio non est prorsus immobilis. Longius enim distant duo haec: quod ab alio mobile, quod omnino stabile. Medium eorum est quod ex se ipso mutabile. Tertium, quia si tanto melius res quaelibet movetur quanto est motori propinquior, et ad optimum motum perveniendum est, oportet alicubi esse aliquid in quo eadem sit mobilis et motoris essentia. Quartum, quia si movendum est aliquid, oportet vel motorem ad mobile ipsum converti, vel contra, vel utrumque vicissim. Ponantur igitur in natura angeli Deusque solum et corpora. Illi ad haec non accedent, quia sunt immutabiles; neque haec ad illos, quia suapte natura torpent. Ergo nec ullus erit motus in rebus. Sit ergo, necesse est, natura quaedam sua sponte mutabilis, quae per se accedens ad corpora torpentia ea suscitet, et ipsa pervigil vires suas in se ipsa prius experiatur quam edat in corpore, ut sicut a spiritali substantia fit substantia corporalis, sic a spiritali motu corporalis motus efficiatur. Quod quidem intellexisse Platonem in Legibus arbitror, ubi inquit: ‘Si nunc stent omnia et paulo post moveri aliquid debeat, quid primo movebitur? Ipsum videlicet quod per se ipsum agile est ad motum, tamquam movendi virtuti propinquius, cuius motum cetera quoque motui subiecta sequentur.’ Id vocat in Phaedro fontem et principium motionis: fontem, quia ex se eam habet; principium, quia effundit in alia.

Sed hic oritur dubitatio. Si Deus et angelus movent aliquid atque anima illis subicitur, ab illis utique agitatur. Quomodo igitur a se movetur? Respondeamus in hunc modum. Cum suspiceret pratum Apelles, conatus est ipsum coloribus in tabula pingere. Pratum quidem totum subito se monstravit et subito appetitum Apellis accendit.

256

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I: Book III

p. 257

But the mover that immediately precedes bodies moved by another is not wholly immovable. For these two stand far apart: what is moved by another and what is altogether stable. Between them lies what is mutable through itself. Third, if each thing is moved the better the nearer it is to its mover, and if the best motion must be reached, there must somewhere be something in which the essence of what is moved and of what moves is the same. Fourth, if anything is to be moved, either the mover must turn toward the movable thing, or the movable toward the mover, or each toward the other. Suppose, then, that in nature there are only angels and God, and bodies. The former will not approach the latter, since they are immutable; nor will bodies approach them, since by their own nature bodies are inert. There will therefore be no motion at all in things. There must, then, be a certain nature mutable of its own accord, which approaches inert bodies through itself and awakens them, while ever watchful it first exercises its powers within itself before bringing them forth in body, so that just as corporeal substance is made from spiritual substance, corporeal motion may be made from spiritual motion. I believe Plato understood this in the Laws, where he says: ‘If all things now stand still and a little later something must be moved, what will be moved first? Clearly that which is of itself active toward motion, as being nearer to the power of moving; the other things subject to motion will follow its motion.’ In the Phaedrus he calls this the fountain and principle of motion: fountain because it has motion from itself, principle because it pours motion into other things.

But here a difficulty arises. If God and angel move something, and soul is subject to them, then soul is surely moved by them. How, then, is it moved by itself? Let us answer in this way. When Apelles looked upon a meadow, he attempted to paint it in colors on a panel. The whole meadow disclosed itself to him at once and at once kindled Apelles’ desire.

257

About This Reading Edition

Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology places the immortality of the soul at the center of an extended philosophical ascent through body, soul, angel, and God. This exact page-aligned Renaissance edition presents the authorial Proem and Books I–IV in a newly established Latin reading text with an independent English translation prepared by Diotimos Editions.

Discussion Questions

Historical Text and Translation

The Latin reading text is based on the Florence editio princeps printed by Antonio Miscomini on 7 November 1482 and principally collated against the Paris 1559 printing, with a 1641 Opera printing used only as a late control and OCR aid. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and substantive departures among the witnesses are documented in the edition’s apparatus.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared this independently worded English translation in house. It aims for a dignified but readable modern register while preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purpose clauses, and direct appeals; long periods are divided only where clarity requires it.

Rights

Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.