Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I
Proem and Books I–IV · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
Latin Page · Branch 12 of 174
Book I · Chapter 2 · §§ 15–17
Latin
p. 26Qualitas autem ideo corpus esse non potest, quia duo corpora eodem in loco sine mutua offensione omnino constare non possunt; qualitates vero plures in eodem pariter confunduntur. Siquidem in mellis materia color flavus, dulcedo et odor, tres qualitates, ubique simul reperiuntur. Quaeque enim guttula mellis flava, dulcis, naribusque suavis est.
Accedit ad haec quod omne corpus natura sua in longum, latum, profundum extenditur. Qualitas autem non sua natura videtur extendi. Nulla enim esset qualitas alicubi non extensa. Insunt tamen puncto, unitati, numero, harmoniae, virtutibus qualitates aliquae non extensae. Qualitas igitur non est corpus.
Praesertim quia, si naturalis ipsi esset extensio, quanto latior fieret, tanto fieret et robustior. Fit autem dispersione debilior. Igitur qualitas per se quodammodo individua in corporis dimensione dividitur. Siquidem ratione quantitatis solum fit divisio, cum divisio ex uno semper deducatur in plura. Servat tamen qualitas etiam in corpore quandam indivisibilis naturae proprietatem. Nam, ut Platonici arbitrantur, albedo quae est in parte quavis corporis albi non proprie dicenda est pars albedinis illius quae est in corpore toto. Immo partis albedo dici debet potius quam pars albedinis. Nempe si album corpus plures in partes diviseris, in singulis partibus eadem restabit albedinis ratio, vis quoque et actio similis, non tamen amplitudo eadem vel aequalis. Ideo non ad qualitatem proprie, sed ad corpus ratione quantitatis divisio pertinet. Ad qualitatem praecipue in exiguum redactam pertinet actio. Haec utique corpus non est, ac maxime cum ad punctum colligitur fit incorporea. Quo fit ut incorporalis naturae virtute, non ex materia corporum, proveniat operatio.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I: Book I
p. 27Quality, however, cannot be a body, because two bodies cannot coexist in the same place without mutual obstruction, whereas several qualities are mingled together in the same thing. Thus in the matter of honey three qualities—a yellow color, sweetness, and fragrance—are found together everywhere. For every drop of honey is yellow, sweet, and pleasing to the nostrils.
There is this further consideration: every body by its nature extends in length, breadth, and depth, whereas quality does not appear to be extended by its own nature. Otherwise there would be no unextended quality anywhere. Yet certain unextended qualities inhere in a point, in unity, in number, in harmony, and in powers. Quality, therefore, is not a body.
More especially, if extension belonged to quality by nature, the wider quality became, the stronger it would become. Yet dispersion makes it weaker. Hence quality, though in itself somehow indivisible, is divided within bodily extension. For division occurs solely by reason of quantity, since division is always drawn out from one into many. Nevertheless, even in body quality preserves a certain property of an indivisible nature. As the Platonists hold, the whiteness in any part of a white body should not properly be called a part of the whiteness in the whole body. It should instead be called the whiteness of a part rather than a part of whiteness. For if you divide a white body into several parts, in every part the same character of whiteness will remain, together with a like power and action; but its extent will not be the same or equal. Division therefore belongs properly not to quality but to body by reason of quantity. Action belongs to quality, especially when it is concentrated into a small compass. Quality is certainly not body; above all, when gathered into a point it becomes incorporeal. It follows that operation arises through the power of an incorporeal nature, not from the matter of bodies.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I · Book I · I.2.15–I.2.17
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology places the immortality of the soul at the center of an extended philosophical ascent through body, soul, angel, and God. This exact page-aligned Renaissance edition presents the authorial Proem and Books I–IV in a newly established Latin reading text with an independent English translation prepared by Diotimos Editions.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is based on the Florence editio princeps printed by Antonio Miscomini on 7 November 1482 and principally collated against the Paris 1559 printing, with a 1641 Opera printing used only as a late control and OCR aid. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and substantive departures among the witnesses are documented in the edition’s apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independently worded English translation in house. It aims for a dignified but readable modern register while preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purpose clauses, and direct appeals; long periods are divided only where clarity requires it.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.