Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I
Proem and Books I–IV · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
English Page · Branch 29 of 174
Book I · Chapter 5 · §§ 1–3
Latin
p. 60Super animam mobilem est immobilis angelus.
Hactenus formam quandam supra corporis complexionem invenimus, quam rationalem animam appellabimus, cuius essentia semper eadem permanet, quod significat stabilitas voluntatis atque memoriae. Operatio autem ex eo mutatur quod non simul cogitat omnia, sed gradatim, neque momento alit, auget et generat corpus, sed tempore. Naturalis virtus manet, quia naturalis eius vigor viget perennis, neque intenditur neque remittitur. Virtus acquisita mutatur, quia ex potentia in actum, ex actu transit in habitum, atque converso.
Hucusque ascendit Heraclitus, Varro atque Manilius. Ceterum altius ascendendum. Siquidem forma haec non potest esse totius naturae principium. Perfectior enim est operatio stabilis, quae uno momento perfectissime suum opus absolvit, quam quae indiget tempore. Integrior vita quae tota simul est unita secum, a se ipsa non distans, quam quae per diversa temporum momenta porrecta secundum actus affectusque intrinsecos quodammodo a semetipsa distrahitur. Igitur super hanc formam, cuius operatio extrinseca vagatur per tempora, cuius vita, id est intrinseca operatio, quasi quodam fluxu dispergitur, ponenda est alia quaedam forma sublimior, cuius operatio stabilis sit, cuius vita tota simul unita.
Siquidem perfecta semper sunt imperfectis anteponenda. Propterea quod sicut perfecta in aliquo genere sunt illa quae per suam naturam sunt talia, sic imperfecta sunt quae per se talia non sunt; alioquin essent integerrime talia. Si itaque imperfecta non sunt per se ipsa, per superiora coguntur esse.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I: Book I
p. 61Above the mobile soul stands the immobile angel.
Thus far we have discovered a form above the constitution of the body, which we shall call the rational soul. Its essence always remains the same, as the stability of will and memory signifies. Its operation, however, changes, because it does not think all things at once but by degrees, and it nourishes, enlarges, and generates the body not in an instant but over time. Its natural power remains, because its natural vigor endures perpetually, neither intensified nor diminished. Its acquired power changes, because it passes from potency into act, from act into habit, and conversely.
Heraclitus, Varro, and Manilius ascended this far; but we must ascend higher. This form cannot be the principle of the whole of nature. For a stable operation, which completes its work to perfection in a single instant, is more perfect than one that requires time. A life wholly present at once, united with itself and not standing apart from itself, is more complete than one stretched across different moments of time and thus, in its inward acts and affections, somehow drawn away from itself. Above this form, then—whose outward operation wanders through time and whose life, that is, its inward operation, is dispersed as though in a current—there must be placed another, more sublime form, whose operation is stable and whose life is wholly united at once.
For the perfect must always be placed before the imperfect. Just as the perfect things in any kind are those which are such through their own nature, so the imperfect are those which are not such through themselves; otherwise they would be such in the fullest degree. If, then, imperfect things do not exist through themselves, they are compelled to exist through higher things.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I · Book I · I.5.1–I.5.3
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology places the immortality of the soul at the center of an extended philosophical ascent through body, soul, angel, and God. This exact page-aligned Renaissance edition presents the authorial Proem and Books I–IV in a newly established Latin reading text with an independent English translation prepared by Diotimos Editions.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is based on the Florence editio princeps printed by Antonio Miscomini on 7 November 1482 and principally collated against the Paris 1559 printing, with a 1641 Opera printing used only as a late control and OCR aid. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and substantive departures among the witnesses are documented in the edition’s apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independently worded English translation in house. It aims for a dignified but readable modern register while preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purpose clauses, and direct appeals; long periods are divided only where clarity requires it.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.