Diotimos Library · Renaissance Collection · Bilingual Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I
Proem and Books I–IV · Latin with an independent English translation
Explore the LexiconSwipe or use the arrow keys.
English Page · Branch 27 of 174
Book I · Chapter 4 · §§ 2–3
Latin
p. 56Quod hinc rursus apparet perspicue, quod affectio corporis quae per qualitates efficitur non potest per aliquam temporis moram eadem penitus et similis permanere, ac semper tum in aliam atque aliam graduum proportionem, tum in melius vel deterius permutatur. Nempe si quis dixerit adultam corporis affectionem permansisse per horam, Platonici ita interrogabunt illum: hora finita, nunquid par sit tunc in illa affectione virtus ac in horae principio? Si non sit par virtus, certe non stetit horam, cum in ea hora sit secundum potentiam permutata. Si par virtus dicatur inesse, affectio illa horam rursus aliam perdurabit. Aequales enim vires aequalia faciunt. Igitur si per tantam vim permansit horam, per aequalem rursus aliam permanebit. Hora secunda expleta, similiter de virtute illa interrogabunt: parne sit an impar. Si impar, non stetit. Sin par, stabit quoque tantundem. Deinceps in infinitum similiter procedent, monstrabuntque naturam illam corporis, si modo horam aut horae dimidium steterit, perpetuo permansuram. Perpetuo vero non viget corporis secundum se ullius complexio, cum brevi omnes extinguantur et pereant. Itaque vix momentum temporis eaedem perseverant. Et quia in eodem momento incipiunt atque desinunt, in incipiendo autem et desinendo integerrimus existendi habitus minime possidetur, integro vero existendi actu opus est ad agendum, ideo confirmari videtur quod in superiori disputatione probavimus, non esse in qualitatibus sufficiens agendi principium.
Sed ut ad quaestionem hic propositam revertamur, si est in qualitatibus, quantum ad eas attinet, motio status omnis quodammodo expers, quonam pacto ab ea causa gigni proxime possunt, quae tanto ab ipsis intervallo distet ut statum habeat omnis motionis expertem? Si ab extremo ad extremum omnia per media transeunt, ut ab hieme per ver in aestatem, ab aestate in hiemem per autumnum, certe inter qualitatem penitus mobilem atque essentiam prorsus immobilem necessario ponendum est aliquid quod partim immobile sit, partim etiam mobile. Itaque substantia illa qualitatum proxime genitrix omnino immobilis esse non potest.
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I: Book I
p. 57This becomes clear again from the following. A bodily condition produced by qualities cannot remain entirely the same and unchanged for any span of time; it is always altered both into one proportion of degrees and then another, and for better or worse. Suppose someone were to say that a fully developed bodily condition had endured for an hour. When the hour was over, the Platonists would ask him whether the power in that condition was then equal to what it had been at the hour's beginning. If the power was not equal, the condition certainly did not stand unchanged for the hour, since during that hour it was altered in its potency. If an equal power is said to remain in it, the condition will endure for another hour. Equal powers produce equal effects. Hence, if through so great a power it remained for one hour, through an equal power it will remain for another. When the second hour is complete, they will again ask whether that power is equal or unequal. If unequal, the condition did not stand; if equal, it will stand for just as long again. Proceeding in the same way without end, they will show that this bodily nature, if it has stood for even an hour or half an hour, will remain forever. Yet no bodily constitution considered in itself endures forever, since all such constitutions are soon extinguished and perish. Thus the same constitutions scarcely persist for a moment. And because they begin and end in the same instant, while in beginning and ending they do not possess the fullest state of existence, and because a complete act of existing is required for acting, this appears to confirm what we proved in the preceding discussion: qualities do not contain a sufficient principle of action.
But to return to the question proposed here: if, so far as qualities themselves are concerned, there is in them a motion devoid of every kind of stability, how can they be generated immediately by a cause so far removed from them that it possesses a state wholly free of motion? If everything passes from one extreme to another through intermediates—as from winter through spring into summer, and from summer through autumn into winter—then between wholly mobile quality and wholly immobile essence there must necessarily be something that is partly immobile and partly mobile. The substance that is the immediate begetter of qualities therefore cannot be altogether immobile.
Socrates
Reading Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology, Volume I · Book I · I.4.2–I.4.3
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Marsilio Ficino’s Platonic Theology places the immortality of the soul at the center of an extended philosophical ascent through body, soul, angel, and God. This exact page-aligned Renaissance edition presents the authorial Proem and Books I–IV in a newly established Latin reading text with an independent English translation prepared by Diotimos Editions.
Historical Text and Translation
The Latin reading text is based on the Florence editio princeps printed by Antonio Miscomini on 7 November 1482 and principally collated against the Paris 1559 printing, with a 1641 Opera printing used only as a late control and OCR aid. Abbreviations are expanded, spelling and punctuation are conservatively normalized, and substantive departures among the witnesses are documented in the edition’s apparatus.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared this independently worded English translation in house. It aims for a dignified but readable modern register while preserving Ficino’s argumentative sequence, metaphors, technical distinctions, repetitions, conditions, purpose clauses, and direct appeals; long periods are divided only where clarity requires it.
Rights
Ficino’s Latin source work is in the public domain. The 2026 English translation and Diotimos editorial matter are original to this edition and remain © 2026 Diotimos.