Tap the page, move to the top or bottom edge, swipe down, or press Tab to reveal reading controls. Use the arrow keys or swipe sideways to turn pages.

← ExitCandida Phoenix Philosophica
Bibliography and Digital Witnesses

Bibliography and digital witnesses

Anonymous. Candida Phoenix philosophica, oder Auffrichtige Beschreibung der Materiæ Lapidis und des Mercurii Philosophorum, durch die Gleich- und Geheimnuß des Regenwassers. Frankfurt am Main: Christian Hermsdorff, 1680. Wellcome Library digitization b32993456; base witness for this edition. https://archive.org/details/b32993456

Wellcome Collection. Catalogue record qech4ce4 for the 1680 Candida Phoenix philosophica: two parts in one volume, 245 pages and fifteen unnumbered pages. https://wellcomecollection.org/works/qech4ce4

Ferguson, John. Bibliotheca Chemica: A Catalogue of the Alchemical, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Books in the Collection of the Late James Young of Kelly and Durris. Vol. I. Glasgow: James Maclehose and Sons, 1906, p. 139. https://archive.org/details/bibliothecachemi01glasuoft/page/139/mode/2up

Hesteau de Nuysement, Clovis. Traittez du vray sel, secret des philosophes, et de l’esprit general du monde. Paris: Jérémie Perier and Abdias Buisard, 1621. Bibliographic identification and subject matter checked through the Wellcome record; quotations in Candida are translated from Candida’s text. https://wellcomecollection.org/works/hngyrnnr

Hirai, Hiro. “Kircher’s Chymical Interpretation of the Creation and Spontaneous Generation.” In Chymists and Chymistry: Studies in the History of Alchemy and Early Modern Chemistry, edited by Lawrence M. Principe, 77–87. Sagamore Beach: Science History Publications, 2007. Comparative context, especially pp. 78–81 and 84–85. https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/376797

Klein, Joel A. “Chymistry Goes Further: Sensible Principiata and Things Themselves Over the Longue Durée.” In Traditions of Analysis and Synthesis, edited by William R. Newman and Jutta Schickore, 59–85. Archimedes 73. Cham: Springer, 2025. Comparative terminology and historiography, especially section 4.2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76398-4_4

Niermeier-Dohoney, Justin. “‘Rusticall chymistry’: Alchemy, saltpeter projects, and experimental fertilizers in seventeenth-century English agriculture.” History of Science 60, no. 4 (2022): 546–574. Comparative context for atmospheric, seminal and agricultural matter theories. https://doi.org/10.1177/00732753211033159

Nummedal, Tara. “Alchemy and Religion in Christian Europe.” Ambix 60, no. 4 (2013): 311–322. Historical and methodological context for religious interpretation and material practice. https://doi.org/10.1179/0002698013Z.00000000036

Merrill, George P., assisted by Margaret W. Moodey and Edgar T. Wherry. Handbook and Descriptive Catalogue of the Collections of Gems and Precious Stones in the United States National Museum. United States National Museum Bulletin 118. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1922. Gem nomenclature, entry “Bohemian diamond.” https://repository.si.edu/items/289deca0-e4d8-4e8a-a9fb-b2eae543f28d

Kalliope Union Catalogue. Authority record for Lazarus Ercker, GND 119134403. Used for identification of the mining and assaying author named Erkard in the source. https://www.kalliope-verbund.info/de/eac?eac.id=119134403

Contents

Sign in to save your reading →