DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition

Robert Burton

The Anatomy of Melancholy

1651 English with a close modern English rendering

Explore the Lexicon
The Anatomy of MelancholyPersistence and Opportunity of Time and Place; Meetings, Conversation…

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

1651 English Page · Branch 771 of 1495

Persistence and Opportunity of Time and Place; Meetings, Conversation…

1651 English

492–493–493

Gregory Nazianzen that eloquent Divine (as he relates the story himself) when a noble friend of his solemnly invited him with other Bishops, to his daughter Olympia’s wedding, refused to come: For it is absurd to see an old gouty Bishop sit amongst dancers, he held it unfit to be a spectator, much less an actor.

Nemo saltat sobrius, Tully writes, he is not a sober man that danceth; for some such reason (belike) Domitian forbad the Romane Senators to dance, and for that fact removed many of them from the Senate.

But these, you will say, are lascivious and Pagan dances, ’tis the abuse that causeth such inconvenience, and I do not well therefore to condemn, speak against, or innocently to accuse the best and pleasantest thing (so Lucian calls it) that belongs to mortall men.

You misinterpret, I condemn it not; I hold it notwithstanding an honest disport, a lawful recreation, if it be opportune, moderately and soberly used: I am of Plutarchs mind, that which respects pleasure alone, honest recreation, or bodily exercise, ought not to be rejected and contemned:

I subscribe to Lucian, ’tis an elegant thing, which cheareth up the mind, exerciseth the body, delights the spectators, which teacheth many comely gestures, equally affecting the ears, eyes, and soul it self.

Salust discommends singing and dancing in Sempronia, not that she did sing or dance, but that she did it in excess, ’tis the abuse of it: and Gregories refusal doth not simply condemn it, but in some folks. Many will not allow men and women to dance together, because it is a provocation to lust: they may as well with Lycurgus and Mahomet, cut down all Vines, forbid the drinking of Wine, for that it makes some men drunk.

Nihil prodest quod non lædere possit idem: Igne quid utilius? ——

I say of this as of all other honest recreations, they are like fire, good and bad, and I see no such inconvenience, but that they may so dance, if it be done at due times, and by fit persons: and conclude with Wolfgangus Hider, and most of our modern divines: Si decoræ, graves, verecundæ, plena luce bonorum virorum & matronarum honestarum, tempestive fiant, probari possunt, & debent.

There is a time to mourn, a time to dance, Eccles. 3. 4. Let them take their pleasures then, and as he said of old, young men and maids flourishing in their age, fair and lovely to behold, well attired and of comely carriage, dancing a Greek Galiard, and as their dance required, kept their time, now turning now tracing, now apart now altogether, now a courtesie then a caper, &c. and it was a pleasant sight, to see those pretty knots, and swimming figures.

492–493–493

The Anatomy of Melancholy: Persistence and Opportunity of Time and Place; Meetings, Conversation…

p. 771

Gregory Nazianzen, that eloquent theologian, tells how a noble friend formally invited him and other bishops to his daughter Olympia’s wedding. He declined: “For it is absurd to see an old, gouty bishop sitting among dancers.” He thought it unsuitable to be a spectator, still less a participant.

“No sober man dances,” Cicero writes: the man who dances is not sober. Perhaps for some such reason Domitian forbade Roman senators to dance, and expelled many from the Senate for doing so.

But these, you will say, are lewd and pagan dances. The abuse causes the harm, and therefore I am wrong to condemn, speak against or “unjustly accuse the best and pleasantest thing in human life,” as Lucian calls it.

You misunderstand me: I do not condemn it. I still regard it as an innocent amusement and a lawful recreation when practised at a suitable time, moderately and soberly. I agree with Plutarch: “What serves pleasure alone, innocent recreation or bodily exercise should not be rejected and despised.”

I agree with Lucian: “It is a graceful art that cheers the mind, exercises the body, delights its spectators and teaches many becoming gestures, appealing equally to the ears, the eyes and the soul itself.”

Sallust censures Sempronia’s singing and dancing, not because she sang or danced, but because she did so excessively: it is the abuse he condemns. Gregory’s refusal likewise condemns it only for certain people, not absolutely. Many will not allow men and women to dance together because it provokes lust. They might as well, with Lycurgus and Muhammad, cut down all vines and forbid wine because it makes some people drunk.

Nothing benefits us that cannot also harm us: What is more useful than fire?

I say of this what I say of all other innocent recreations: they are like fire, both good and bad. I see no harm sufficient to forbid such dancing, provided it is done at proper times and by suitable people. I conclude with Wolfgang Hider and most of our modern theologians: “If dances are becoming, dignified and modest, performed in full daylight in the presence of good men and respectable married women, and at a fitting time, they can and should be approved.”

“There is a time to mourn and a time to dance,” Ecclesiastes 3:4. Let them take their pleasures, then. As an ancient writer says: “Young men and maidens in the flower of their age, fair and lovely to see, well dressed and graceful in bearing, danced a Greek galliard. Keeping time as the dance required, they now turned, now stepped through its patterns, now moved apart, now together, now curtsied, then leaped,” and so on. Those intricate formations and flowing figures were a delightful sight.

771

About This Reading Edition

Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.

Historical Text and Translation

The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.

Rights

Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.