DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition

Robert Burton

The Anatomy of Melancholy

1651 English with a close modern English rendering

Explore the Lexicon
The Anatomy of MelancholyArtificial Attractions of Love and Incitements to Lust Gestures Clothes Dowry…

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

Modern English Page · Branch 749 of 1495

Artificial Attractions of Love and Incitements to Lust Gestures Clothes Dowry…

1651 English

474

Quid sibi vult pixidum turba, saith Lucian, To what use are pins, pots, glasses, ointments, irons, combs, bodkins, setting-sticks? why bestow they all their patrimonies and husbands yearly revenues on such fooleries? bina patrimonia singulis auribus; why use they dragons, wasps, snakes, for chains, inamelled jewels on their necks, ears? dignam potius foret ferro manus istas religari, atque utinam monilia verè dracones essent; they had more need some of them be tied in Bedlam with iron chains, have a whip for a fan, and hair-cloaths next to their skins, and instead of wrought smocks, have their cheeks stigmatised with a hot iron; I say, some of our Jesabels, instead of painting, if they were well served.

But why is all this labour, all this cost, preparation, riding, running, far fetched, and dear bought stuffe? Because forsooth they would be fair and fine, and where nature is defective, supply it by art.

Sanguine quæ vero non rubet, arte rubet, (Ovid.)

and to that purpose they annoint and paint their faces, to make Helen of Hecuba —— parvamque exortamque puellam —— Europen; To this intent they crush in their feet and bodies, hurt and crucifie themselves, sometimes in laxe clothes, an hundred yards I think in a gown, a sleeve: and sometimes again so close, ut nudos exprimant artus. Now long tails and trains, and then short, up, down, high, low, thick, thin, &c. now little or no bands, then as big as cart wheels; now loose bodies, then great fardingals and close girt, &c. Why is all this, but with the whore in the Proverbs, to intoxicate some or other? oculorum decipulam, one therefore calls it & Indicem libidinis, the trap of lust, and sure token, as an Ivy-bush is to a Tavern.

Quòd pulchros Glycere sumas de pixide vultus, Quòd tibi compositæ nec sine lege comæ: Quòd niteat digitis adamas, Beryllus in aure, Non sum divinus, sed scio quid cupias.O Glycere in that you paint so much, Your hair is so bedeckt in order such, With rings on fingers, bracelets in your ear, Although no Prophet, tell I can, I fear.

To be admired, to be gazed on, to circumvent some novice; as many times they do, that instead of a Lady he loves a cap and a feather, instead of a maid that should have verum colorem, corpus solidum & succi plenum (as Chærea describes his mistriss in the Poet) a painted face, a ruffe-band, fair and fine linnen, a coronet, a flowre,

(Naturæque putat quod fuit artificis,)

a wrought wastcoate he dotes on, or a pied petticote, a pure die instead of a proper woman. For generally as with rich furred Conies, their cases are far better then their bodies, and like the bark of a Cinnamon tree which is dearer then the whole bulk, their outward accoutrements are far more pretious then their inward indowments. ’Tis too commonly so.

474

The Anatomy of Melancholy: Artificial Attractions of Love and Incitements to Lust Gestures Clothes Dowry…

p. 749

“What is the purpose of this crowd of boxes?” asks Lucian. “What use are pins, pots, mirrors, ointments, curling irons, combs, bodkins and setting-sticks? Why do they spend their entire inheritances and their husbands’ yearly incomes on such follies?” “Two estates on each ear!” “Why do they wear dragons, wasps and snakes as chains and enamelled jewels on their necks and ears? Those hands would deserve better to be bound in iron; would that their necklaces really were snakes!” Some of them would have more need of iron chains in Bedlam, a whip instead of a fan, and haircloth next to their skin; instead of embroidered shifts, their cheeks branded with a hot iron. I mean some of our Jezebels: that would be their due, instead of face-paint.

But why all this labour, expense, preparation, riding and running about, all these goods brought from afar and bought so dearly? Why, because they want to be beautiful and fine, and to supply by art whatever nature lacks.

She who has no natural blush is rosy through art. (Ovid.)

To that end they anoint and paint their faces, making a Helen out of a Hecuba, and a Europa out of “a little, newly grown girl.” To that end they squeeze their feet and bodies, hurting and tormenting themselves: sometimes in loose clothes, with a hundred yards, I think, in a gown or a sleeve; then again so tight that “they reveal the naked limbs.” Now long tails and trains, then short; up, down, high, low, thick, thin, and so on. Now little collars or none, then collars as big as cartwheels; now loose bodices, then huge farthingales and tight girdling, and so on. What is it all for but to intoxicate someone, like the prostitute in Proverbs? One therefore calls it “a trap for the eyes and a sign of lust”—lust’s trap and a sure sign of it, as an ivy-bush marks a tavern.

Glycere, since you take your beauty from a box, And carefully arrange your hair; Since diamonds shine on your fingers, beryl in your ear— I am no prophet, but I know what you desire.

O Glycere, since you paint yourself so much, And deck your hair in such an ordered way, With rings on fingers, bracelets in your ear, Though no prophet, I can tell, I fear.

To be admired, to be gazed at, to ensnare some novice—as they often do, so that instead of a lady he loves a cap and feather; instead of a young woman with “a natural complexion, a firm body full of vitality,” as Chaerea describes his mistress in the poet, he loves a painted face, a ruff, fine white linen, a coronet, a flower—

(And thinks the craftsman’s work is nature’s.)

He dotes on an embroidered waistcoat or a many-coloured petticoat: a fine dye instead of a fine woman. For generally, as with richly furred rabbits, their coverings are far better than their bodies; and, like the bark of a cinnamon tree, worth more than its whole trunk, their outward equipment is far more precious than their inward qualities. It is all too commonly so.

749

About This Reading Edition

Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.

Historical Text and Translation

The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.

Rights

Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.