Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition
Swipe or use the arrow keys.
Modern English Page · Branch 631 of 1495
Subsection 2 Single Substances That Purge Melancholy Downwards
1651 English
380–381Fernelius meth. med. lib. 5. cap. 16. confesseth it to be a terrible purge and hard to take, yet well given to strong men, and such as have able bodies. P. Forestus and Capivaccius forbid it to be taken in substance, but allow it in decoction or infusion, both which wayes P. Monavius approves above all others, Epist. 231. Scoltzii, Iacchinus in 9. Rhasis, commends a receipt of his own preparing; Penottus another of his Chymically prepared, Evonimus another.
Hildesheim spicel. 2. de mel. hath many examples how it should be used, with diversity of receipts. Heurnius lib. 7. prax. med. cap. 14. calls it an innocent medicine howsoever, if it be well prepared. The root of it is onely in use, which may be kept many yeers, and by some given in substance, as by Falopius and Brassivola amongst the rest, who brags that he was the first that restored it again to his use,
and tels a story how he cured one Melatasta a mad man, that was thought to be possessed, in the Duke of Ferrara’s Court with one purge of black Hellebor in substance: the receipt is there to be seen; his excrements were like inke, he perfectly healed at once.
Vidus Vidius a Dutch Physitian, will not admit of it in substance, to whom most subscribe, but as before in the decoction, infusion, or which is all in all, in the Extract, which he prefers before the rest, and calls suave medicamentum, a sweet medicine, an easie, that may be securely given to women, children, and weaklings. Baracellus horto geniali, terms it maximæ præstantia medicamentum, a medicine of great worth and note. Quercetan in his Spagir. Phar. and many other, tell wonders of the Extract.
Paracelsus above all the rest is the greatest admirer of this plant, and especially the extract, he calls it Theriacum, terrestre Balsamum, another Treacle, a terrestriall Bawm, instar omnium, all in all, the sole and last refuge to cure this malady, the Gout, Epilepsie, Leprosie, &c. If this will not help, no Physick in the world can but minerall, it is the upshot of all.
Matthiolus laughs at those that except against it, and though some abhor it out of the authority of Mesue, and dare not adventure to prescribe it, yet I (saith he) have happily used it six hundred times without offence, and communicated it to divers worthy Physitians, who have given me great thanks for it. Look for receipts, dose, preparation, and other cautions concerning this simple in him, Brassivola, Baracellus, Codronchus, and the rest.
The Anatomy of Melancholy: Subsection 2 Single Substances That Purge Melancholy Downwards
p. 631Fernel, Method of Medicine, book 5, chapter 16, admits that it is “a terrible purge and difficult to take, yet suitable for strong men with robust bodies.” Pieter van Foreest and Capivaccius forbid taking the substance itself but permit a decoction or infusion, the two methods P. Monavius prefers above all others in letter 231 in Scholtz. Jacchinus, commenting on the ninth book of Rhazes, recommends a recipe of his own; Penottus another, chemically prepared; and Evonymus another.
Hildesheim, Gleanings, book 2, On Melancholy, gives many examples of its use and a variety of recipes. Heurnius, Medical Practice, book 7, chapter 14, calls it “a harmless medicine, after all, if properly prepared.” Only its root is used, and that may be kept for many years. Some administer the substance itself, among them Fallopius and Brasavola, who boasts that he was the first to restore its use.
He tells how, at the Duke of Ferrara’s court, he cured a madman named Melatasta, thought to be possessed, with a single purge of black hellebore given as the substance itself. The recipe can be found there; the man’s excrement was like ink, and “he recovered completely at once.”
Vidus Vidius, a Dutch physician, refuses to allow the substance itself, and most agree with him. Instead, as before, he permits a decoction or infusion, or, best of all, an extract, which he prefers to the rest and calls “a pleasant medicine”: a sweet, mild medicine that may safely be given to women, children and weak people. Baracellus, in his Delightful Garden, calls it “a medicine of the highest excellence”: a medicine of great worth and distinction. Quercetan, in his Spagyric Pharmacopoeia, and many others tell wonders of the extract.
Above all the others, Paracelsus is this plant’s greatest admirer, especially of its extract. He calls it “theriac, earthly balm”: another theriac, a balm of the earth, “worth all the rest,” everything in one; “the sole and final refuge for curing this disease, gout, epilepsy, leprosy and so on.” If this will not help, no medicine in the world can, except a mineral one: it is the last resort.
Mattioli laughs at those who object to it. Although some reject it on Mesue’s authority and dare not venture to prescribe it, “I,” he says, “have used it successfully six hundred times without harm, and shared it with several worthy physicians, who have thanked me warmly for it.” For recipes, dosage, preparation and other cautions concerning this single substance, consult him, Brasavola, Baracellus, Codronchus and the others.
Socrates
Reading The Anatomy of Melancholy · Subsection 2 Single Substances That Purge Melancholy Downwards
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.
Historical Text and Translation
The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.
Rights
Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.
- PDF editionComplete annotated edition — PDF
- EPUB editionComplete annotated edition — EPUB
- Word editionComplete annotated edition — Word
- Markdown editionComplete annotated edition — Markdown
- Principal historical witnessMcGill University Library — 1651 edition
- Supplied 1651 openingBavarian State Library — supplied opening
- Independent local comparison witnessIndependent 1651 microfilm — comparison opening