DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition

Robert Burton

The Anatomy of Melancholy

1651 English with a close modern English rendering

Explore the Lexicon
The Anatomy of MelancholyMember 1 Subsection 1 Medical Treatment by Medicines

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

1651 English Page · Branch 609 of 1495

Member 1 Subsection 1 Medical Treatment by Medicines

1651 English

363–364–364

The Arabians received it from the Greeks, and so the Latines, adding new precepts and medicines of their own, but so imperfect still, that through ignorance of Professors, Impostors, Mountebanks, Empericks, disagreeing of Sectaries, (which are as many almost as there be diseases) envy, covetousnesse, and the like, they doe much harm amongst us. They are so different in their consultations, prescriptions, mistaking many times the parties constitution, disease, and causes of it, they give quite contrary Physick; one saith this, another that, out of singularity or opposition, as he said of Adrian, multitudo medicorum principem interfecit, a multitude of Physitians hath killed the Emperour; Plus à medico quam à morbo periculi, more danger there is from the Physician, then from the disease.

Besides, there is much Imposture and malice amongst them. All arts (saith Cardan) admit of couzening, Physick amongst the rest, doth appropriate it to her selfe; and tells a story of one Curtius a Physician in Venice, because he was a stranger, and practised among them, the rest of the Physitians did still crosse him in all his precepts.

If he prescribed hot medicines, they would prescribe cold, miscentes pro calidis frigida, pro frigidis humida, pro purgantibus astringentia, binders for purgatives, omnia perturbabant. If the party miscarried, Curtium damnabant, Curtius killed him, that disagreed from them: If he recovered, then they cured him themselves.

Much emulation, imposture, malice, there is amongst them: if they be honest, and mean well, yet a knave Apothecary that administers the Physick, and makes the medicine, may do infinite harm, by his old obsolete doses, adulterine druggs, bad mixtures, a quid pro quo, &c. See Fuchsius lib. 1. sect. 1. cap. 8. Cordus Dispensatory, and Brassivola’s Examen simpl. &c.

But it is their ignorance that doth more harm then rashness, their Art is wholly conjecturall, if it be an art, uncertain, imperfect, and got by killing of men, they are a kind of butchers, leeches, men-slayers; Chirurgeons and Apothecaries especially, that are indeed the Physicians hangmen, carnifices, and common executioners; though to say truth, Physicians themselves come not far behinde; for according to that facete Epigram of Maximilianus Urentius, what’s the difference?

Chirurgus medico quo differt? scilicet isto, Enecat hic succis, enecat ille manu: Carnifice hoc ambo tantum differre videntur, Tardius hi faciunt, quod facit ille citò.

But I return to their skill; many diseases they cannot cure at all, as Apoplexie, Epilepsie, Stone, Strangury, Gout,

Tollere nodosam nescit medicina Podagram;
363–364–364

The Anatomy of Melancholy: Member 1 Subsection 1 Medical Treatment by Medicines

p. 609

The Arabs received medicine from the Greeks, and the Latins did likewise, adding new precepts and medicines of their own. Yet it remains so imperfect that practitioners’ ignorance, impostors, mountebanks, empirics, the disagreements of sects—almost as numerous as diseases—envy, greed and the like cause much harm among us. They differ so greatly in their consultations and prescriptions, often misunderstanding the patient’s constitution, disease and its causes, that they prescribe wholly contrary medicines. “One says this, another that,” from a desire to be different or simply to contradict. As someone said of Hadrian, “a multitude of doctors killed the ruler”: a multitude of physicians killed the emperor. “There is more danger from the physician than from the disease”—more danger from the doctor than the illness.

Besides, there is much deceit and malice among them. “All arts,” says Cardano, “admit cheating; medicine, among the rest, makes it peculiarly its own.” He tells of a physician named Curtius in Venice: because he was an outsider practising among them, the other physicians continually contradicted all his instructions.

If he prescribed hot medicines, they prescribed cold ones, “mixing cold remedies in place of hot, moist in place of cold, astringents in place of purgatives”—binding medicines instead of purges; “they threw everything into confusion.” If the patient died, “they condemned Curtius”: Curtius, who disagreed with them, had killed him. If he recovered, then they themselves had cured him.

There is much rivalry, deceit and malice among them. Even if they are honest and mean well, a dishonest apothecary who prepares and administers the medicine may do boundless harm through stale, outworn preparations, adulterated drugs, bad mixtures, substituting one ingredient for another, and so on. See Fuchs, book 1, section 1, chapter 8; Cordus’s Dispensatory; and Brasavola’s Examination of Simples, among others.

But their ignorance does more harm than their rashness. Their art—if it is an art—is wholly conjectural, uncertain, imperfect, and learned by killing people. They are a sort of butchers, leeches and killers, especially surgeons and apothecaries, who are indeed the physicians’ hangmen, “executioners,” and public headsmen. Yet, to tell the truth, physicians themselves are not far behind. For, according to that witty epigram by Maximilianus Urentius, what is the difference?

How does a surgeon differ from a physician? In this: The physician kills with drugs, the surgeon with his hand. Both seem to differ from the executioner only in this: They do more slowly what he does quickly.

But I return to their skill. Many diseases they cannot cure at all: apoplexy, epilepsy, stone, strangury, gout,

Medicine cannot remove the knotted swellings of gout.

609

About This Reading Edition

Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.

Historical Text and Translation

The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.

Rights

Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.