Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition
Swipe or use the arrow keys.
1651 English Page · Branch 180 of 1495
Subsection 2 a Digression on the Nature of Spirits Evil Angels or Devils And…
1651 English
40–41They are (as others suppose) appointed by those higher Powers to keep men from their nativity, and to protect, or punish them as they see cause: and are called boni and mali Genii by the Romans. Heroes, Lares, if good, Lemures or Larvæ if bad, by the Stoicks, governours of Countries, Men, Cities, saith Apuleius,
Deos appellant qui ex hominum numero juste ac prudenter vitæ curriculo gubernato, pro numine, postea ab hominibus præditi fanis & ceremoniis vulgo admittuntur, ut in Ægypto Osyris, &c. Præstites, Capella calls them, which protected particular men as well as Princes,
Socrates had his Dæmonium Saturninum & ignium, which of all spirits is best, ad sublimes cogitationes animum erigentem, as the Platonists supposed; Plotinus his; and we Christians our assisting Angel, as Andreas Victorellus, a copious writer of this subject, Lodovicus de La-Cerda the Jesuit in his Voluminous Tract de Angelo Custode, Zanchius, and some Divines think. But this absurd Tenent of Tyreus, Proclus confutes at large in his book de Animâ & dæmone.
Psellus a Christian, and sometimes Tutor (saith Cuspinian) to Michael Parapinatus, Emperour of Greece, a great observer of the nature of Devils, holds they are corporeal, and have aeriall bodies, that they are mortall, live and dye, (which Martianus Capella likewise maintaines, but our Christian Philosophers explode) that they are nourished and have excrements,
that they feele paine if they be hurt (which Cardan confirmes, and Scaliger justly laughs him to scorne for; Si pascantur aere, cur non pugnant ob puriorem aera? &c.) or stricken: and if their bodyes be cut, with admirable celerity they come together again.
Austin in Gen. lib. 3. lib. arbit. approves as much, mutata casu corpora in deteriorem qualitatem aëris spissioris, so doth Hierome, Comment. in epist. ad Ephes. cap. 3. Origen, Tertullian, Lactantius, and many ancient Fathers of the Church: That in their fall their bodyes were changed into a more aerial and gross substance.
Bodine lib. 4. Theatri Naturæ, and David Crusius Hermeticæ Philosophiæ lib. 1. cap. 4. by several arguments proves Angels and Spirits to be Corporeal: quicquid continetur in loco Corporeum est: At spiritus continetur in loco, ergo. Si Spiritus sunt quanti, erunt Corporei: At sunt quanti, ergo. Sunt finiti, ergo quanti, &c.
Bodine goes farther yet, and will have these, Animæ separatæ genii, Spirits, Angels, Devils, and so likewise soules of men departed, if Corporeal (which he most eagerly contends) to be of some shape, and that absolutely round, like Sun and Moone, because that is the most perfect forme, quæ nihil habet asperitatis, nihil angulis incisum, nihil anfractibus involutum, nihil eminens, sed inter corpora perfecta est perfectissimum; therefore all spirits are corporeal he concludes, & in their proper shapes round.
That they can assume other aerial bodies, all manner of shapes at their pleasures, appear in what likeness they will themselves, that they are most swift in motion, can pass many miles in an instant, & so likewise transform bodies of others into what shape they please, and with admirable celerity remove them from place to place;
The Anatomy of Melancholy: Subsection 2 a Digression on the Nature of Spirits Evil Angels or Devils And…
p. 180Others suppose that the higher powers appoint them to watch over people from birth, and to protect or punish them as they see fit. The Romans call them good and evil guardian spirits. The Stoics call the good ones Heroes or Lares, and the bad ones Lemures or Larvae: governors of countries, people and cities, says Apuleius.
“They call gods those who, having lived justly and wisely as human beings, are afterwards generally acknowledged as divinities and honoured by people with temples and ceremonies: Osiris in Egypt, for example.” Capella calls them protecting spirits, who guard private individuals as well as princes.
Socrates had his Saturnine and fiery spirit, the best of all spirits, which raises the mind to lofty thoughts, as the Platonists supposed; Plotinus had his; and we Christians have our assisting angel, as Andrea Vittorelli, who writes extensively on this subject, the Jesuit Luis de la Cerda in his lengthy treatise On the Guardian Angel, Zanchi and some theologians believe. But Proclus refutes this absurd doctrine of Maximus of Tyre at length in his book On the Soul and the Daemon.
Psellus, a Christian and formerly tutor, according to Cuspinian, to Michael Parapinaces, emperor of the Greeks, was a close observer of the nature of devils. He holds that they are corporeal and have bodies made of air; that they are mortal, live and die—a view Martianus Capella also maintains, but which our Christian philosophers reject—and that they take nourishment and produce excrement.
They feel pain if injured or struck, a claim Cardano confirms and Scaliger rightly ridicules: “If they feed on air, why do they not fight for purer air?” and so on. If their bodies are cut apart, they join together again with astonishing speed.
Augustine, in On Genesis, book 3, and On Free Choice, supports a similar view: “Their bodies were changed by the fall into the inferior condition of denser air.” So do Jerome, in his commentary on chapter 3 of the Epistle to the Ephesians, Origen, Tertullian, Lactantius and many ancient Fathers of the Church: at their fall, their bodies were changed into a more airy and coarse substance.
Bodin, in book 4 of his Theatre of Nature, and David Crusius, in book 1, chapter 4 of his Hermetic Philosophy, offer several arguments to prove that angels and spirits have bodies: “Whatever is contained in a place is corporeal. But a spirit is contained in a place; therefore it is corporeal. If spirits have dimensions, they must be corporeal. But they do have dimensions; therefore they are corporeal. They are finite, and therefore have dimensions,” and so on.
Bodin goes further still. He holds that these disembodied souls, guardian spirits, angels and devils, and likewise the souls of the dead, if corporeal—as he strongly insists they are—must have some shape. That shape must be perfectly round, like the sun and moon, because this is the most perfect form: “It has no roughness, no indenting angles, no winding folds, no projections, but among perfect bodies is the most perfect.” He therefore concludes that all spirits are corporeal and round in their natural shapes.
Most writers on this subject regard it as credible that spirits can assume other bodies made of air and every kind of shape at will; appear in whatever likeness they choose; move with extraordinary speed and cover many miles in an instant; and likewise transform the bodies of others into any shape they please and move them from place to place with astonishing speed;
Socrates
Reading The Anatomy of Melancholy · Subsection 2 a Digression on the Nature of Spirits Evil Angels or Devils And…
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.
Historical Text and Translation
The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.
Rights
Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.
- PDF editionComplete annotated edition — PDF
- EPUB editionComplete annotated edition — EPUB
- Word editionComplete annotated edition — Word
- Markdown editionComplete annotated edition — Markdown
- Principal historical witnessMcGill University Library — 1651 edition
- Supplied 1651 openingBavarian State Library — supplied opening
- Independent local comparison witnessIndependent 1651 microfilm — comparison opening