DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition

Robert Burton

The Anatomy of Melancholy

1651 English with a close modern English rendering

Explore the Lexicon
The Anatomy of MelancholySubsection 2 a Digression on the Nature of Spirits Evil Angels or Devils And…

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

Modern English Page · Branch 179 of 1495

Subsection 2 a Digression on the Nature of Spirits Evil Angels or Devils And…

1651 English

39–40

SUBSEC. 2. A Digression of the nature of Spirits, bad Angels, or Devils, and how they cause Melancholy.

How far the power of Spirits and Devils doth extend, and whether they can cause this, or any other Disease, is a serious question, and worthy to be considered: for the better understanding of which, I will make a brief digression of the nature of Spirits.

And although the question be very obscure, according to Postellus, full of controversie and ambiguity: beyond the reach of humane capacity, fateor excedere vires intentionis meæ, saith Austin, I confess I am not able to understand it, finitum de infinito non potest statuere, we can sooner determine with Tully de nat. deorum, quid non sint, quam quid sint,

our subtle Schoolmen, Cardans, Scaligers, profound Thomists, Fracastoriana & Ferneliana acies, are weak, dry, obscure, defective in these mysteries: and all our quickest wits, as an owles eyes at the Suns light, wax dull, and are not sufficient to apprehend them, yet as in the rest, I will adventure to say something to this point.

In former times, as we reade Acts. 23. the Sadduces denied that there were any such Spirits, Devils, or Angels. So did Galen the Physitian, the Peripateticks, even Aristotle himself, as Pomponatius stoutly maintains, and Scaliger in some sort grants. Though Dandinus the Jesuit, com. in lib. 2. de anima, stifly denies it;

substantiæ separatæ and intelligences, are the same which Christians call Angels, and Platonists Devils, for they name all the Spirits, dæmones, be they good or bad Angels, as Iulius Pollux Onomasticon, lib. 1. cap. 1. observes. Epicures and Atheists are of the same minde in generall, because they never saw them.

Plato, Plotinus, Porphyrius, Iamblicus, Proclus, insisting in the steps of Trismegistus, Pythagoras and Socrates, make no doubt of it: Nor Stoicks, but that there are such spirits, though much erring from the truth.

Concerning the first beginning of them, the Thalmudists say that Adam had a wife called Lilis, before he marryed Eve, and of her he begat nothing but Devils. The Turks Alcoran is altogether as absurd and ridiculous in this point: but the Scripture informs us Christians; how Lucifer the chief of them with his associates, fell from heaven for his pride, and ambition;

created of God, placed in heaven, and sometimes an Angel of light, now cast down into the lower aeriall sublunary parts, or into Hell, and delivered into chains of darkness (2 Pet. 2.4.) to be kept unto damnation.

There is a foolish opinion which some hold, that they are the souls of men departed; good and more noble were deified, the baser groveled on the ground, or in the lower parts: and were devils, the which with Tertullian, Porphyrius the Philosopher, M. Tyrius ser. 27. maintaines. These spirits, he saith, which we call Angels and Devils, are nought but souls of men departed, which either through love and pity of their friends yet living, help and assist them, or else persecute their enemies, whom they hated, as Dido threatned to persecute Æneas:

Omnibus umbra locis adero: dabis improbe pœnas.
39–40

The Anatomy of Melancholy: Subsection 2 a Digression on the Nature of Spirits Evil Angels or Devils And…

p. 179

SUBSECTION 2 A digression on the nature of spirits Evil angels or devils and how they cause melancholy

How far the power of spirits and devils extends, and whether they can cause this or any other disease, is a serious question worth considering. To make it better understood, I shall briefly digress on the nature of spirits.

The question is extremely obscure—full of controversy and uncertainty, according to Postel—and beyond human understanding. “I confess that it exceeds the powers of my inquiry,” says Augustine; I admit that I cannot understand it. The finite cannot pass judgement on the infinite. With Cicero, in On the Nature of the Gods, we can more readily determine what spirits are not than what they are.

Our subtle scholastics, our Cardanos and Scaligers, our profound Thomists, the penetrating intellects of Fracastoro and Fernel, are weak, barren, obscure and inadequate when faced with these mysteries. All our sharpest minds grow dim, like an owl’s eyes in sunlight, and cannot grasp them. Yet, as with the other subjects, I shall venture to say something about this one.

In former times, as we read in Acts 23, the Sadducees denied the existence of such spirits, devils or angels. So did the physician Galen, the Peripatetics and even Aristotle himself, as Pomponazzi firmly maintains and Scaliger to some extent concedes—although the Jesuit Dandini strongly denies this in his commentary on book 2 of On the Soul.

Separate substances and intelligences are the same beings that Christians call angels and Platonists call demons: they give all spirits the name daimones, whether good or evil angels, as Julius Pollux observes in book 1, chapter 1 of his Onomasticon. Epicureans and atheists generally share the view that they do not exist, because they have never seen them.

Plato, Plotinus, Porphyry, Iamblichus and Proclus, following in the footsteps of Trismegistus, Pythagoras and Socrates, have no doubt that such spirits exist. Neither do the Stoics, although they stray far from the truth.

As for their first origin, the Talmudists say that Adam had a wife called Lilith before he married Eve, and that by her he fathered nothing but devils. The Turks’ Koran is just as absurd and ridiculous on this point. But Scripture informs us Christians how Lucifer, their chief, fell from heaven with his companions because of his pride and ambition;

created by God, placed in heaven and once an angel of light, he is now cast down into the lower regions of air beneath the moon, or into hell, and “handed over to chains of darkness,” 2 Peter 2:4, to be held until condemnation.

Some hold the foolish opinion that these spirits are the souls of the dead: the good and nobler souls were made gods, while the baser ones grovelled on the ground or in the lower regions and became devils. Tertullian, the philosopher Porphyry and Maximus of Tyre, in Discourse 27, maintain this. These spirits that we call angels and devils, he says, are nothing but the souls of the dead, who either help and support their surviving friends through love and pity, or persecute the enemies they hated, as Dido threatened to persecute Aeneas:

Everywhere my ghost will haunt you; you villain, you will pay.

179

About This Reading Edition

Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.

Historical Text and Translation

The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.

Rights

Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.