DiotimosReading Desk

Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition

Robert Burton

The Anatomy of Melancholy

1651 English with a close modern English rendering

Explore the Lexicon
The Anatomy of MelancholyContextual Lexicon

Swipe or use the arrow keys.

English Introduction · Branch 1175 of 1495

Contextual Lexicon

The Anatomy of Melancholy: Contextual Lexicon

p. 1175

In Burton. In the discussion of spirits, even the sharpest learned minds are said to fail before the mysteries. The next passage reports disagreement about Aristotle and spirits. Elsewhere school divinity supplies examples of inquiry that Burton condemns as perplexing and practically fruitless.

The places. Schoolmen appear among learned thinkers whose understanding is inadequate. (p. 39; DJR-028-23.) Peripatetics enter a disputed account of belief in spirits. (p. 39; DJR-028-24.) School divinity names the theology attacked for fruitless questions. (p. 166–167; DJR-055-18.)

In this edition. “Schoolmen” → “scholastics” (DJR-028-23); “Peripateticks” → “Peripatetics” (DJR-028-24); “school divinity” → “scholastic theology” (DJR-055-18). Scholastic identifies the intellectual tradition rather than a school occupation. The account of Aristotelian belief retains its competing authorities.

See also. Divine; Cento; Neoterics.

Science

Source forms: science; sciences; theorick

The word. Science can mean a branch of knowledge or learning, without the modern restriction to experimental or natural science. Theorick is theory, here distinguished from medical practice.

In Burton. Burton’s account of his wide reading refuses confinement to a single science. The complaint about publishing similarly treats sciences as learned disciplines that poor writing debases. His account of medical study then claims theoretical acquaintance while expressly denying an intention to practise.

The places. One science is one branch of learning among many. (p. 3; DJR-002-01.) Noble sciences are learned fields harmed by unskilled writing. (p. 7; DJR-004-08.) Theorick names study of medicine apart from practice. (p. 16; DJR-006-22.)

In this edition. “one science” → “one branch of learning” (DJR-002-01); “noble sciences” → “noble fields of knowledge” (DJR-004-08); “the theorick of physick” → “medical theory” (DJR-006-22). Learning and knowledge retain the breadth of the first two uses. Medical theory preserves the narrower theory/practice contrast without implying a medical qualification.

See also. Cento; Art.

Scruple

Source forms: scrupulous conscience; scrupulous

The word. A scruple is a doubt or hesitation about right conduct. Scrupulous conscience in these passages means excessive, troubling moral doubt, whereas having a scruple can simply mean taking moral obligation seriously.

In Burton. The historical medical account relates a tortured conscience to melancholy constitution. Burton describes sufferers who magnify small offences or accuse themselves without adequate cause. The later accusation of never making conscience of wrongdoing uses the underlying moral concern in a different, ordinary sense.

The places. Scrupulous conscience is linked to melancholy constitution. (p. 695; DJR-164-09.) The sufferer magnifies offences and distrusts mercy. (p. 699; DJR-164-48.) Making conscience means considering conduct as morally binding. (p. 711; DJR-167-18.)

In this edition. “Conscientia scrupulosa” → “A scrupulous conscience” (DJR-164-09); “This scrupulous conscience” → “this scrupulous conscience” (DJR-164-48); “mad’st any conscience” → “had any scruple” (DJR-167-18). Scrupulous is retained with explanation of its distressing excess. Scruple in the final example translates a different source expression and does not itself imply an illness.

See also. Despair; Conscience; Curiosity.

Secure

Source forms: securely; secure; security

1175

About This Reading Edition

Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.

Historical Text and Translation

The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.

About Diotimos Editions

Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.

Rights

Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.