Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition
Swipe or use the arrow keys.
Modern English Page · Branch 1017 of 1495
Member 2 Subsection 1 Religious Melancholy From Deficiency: Those…
1651 English
685–686–686and those religions some of them so phantasticall, exorbitant, so violently maintained with equall constancie and assurance; whence they infer, that if there be so many religious sects, and denyed by the rest, why may they not be all false? or why should this or that be preferred before the rest? The Scepticks urge this, and amongst others it is the conclusion of Sextus Empericus lib.8. advers. Mathematicos:
after many Philosophical arguments and reasons pro and con that there are Gods, and again that there are no Gods, he so concludes, cum tot inter se pugnent, &c. Una tantum potest esse vera, as Tully likewise disputes: Christians say, they alone worship the true God, pity all other sects, lament their case;
and yet those old Greeks and Romans that worshiped the Divel, as the China’s do now, aut Deos Topicos their own Gods; as Julian the Apostate, Cecilius in Minutius, Celsus and Porphyrius the Philosopher object: and as Machiavel contends, were much more noble, generous, victorious, had a more flourishing common-wealth, better Cities, better Souldiers, better Scholars, better wits. Their Gods often overcame our Gods, did as many miracles, &c.
Saint Cyril, Arnobius, Minutius, with many other ancients, of late Lessius, Morneus, Grotius de verit. Relig. Christianæ, Savanarola de verit. fidei Christianæ, well defend; but Zanchius, Campanella, Marinus Marcennus, Bozius, and Gentilettus answer all these Atheistical arguments at large. But this again troubles many as of old, wicked men generally thrive, professed Atheists thrive,
Nullos esse Deos, inane cœlum, Affirmat Selius: probatque, quod se Factum, dum negat hæc, videt beatum;There are no Gods, heavens are toyes, Selius in publique justifies; Because that whil’st he thus denyes Their Deities, he better thrives.This is a prime argument: and most part your most sincere, upright, honest, and good men are depressed, The race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, (Eccles.9.11.) nor yet bread to the wise, favour nor riches to men of understanding, but time and chance comes to all.
There was a great plague in Athens (as Thucydides lib.2. relates) in which at last every man with great licentiousness, did what he list, not caring at all for Gods or mens laws. Neither the fear of God nor lawes of men (saith he) awed any man, because the plague swept all away alike, good and bad; they thence concluded it was alike to worship or not worship the Gods, since they perished all alike.
Some cavil and make doubts of Scripture it self, it cannot stand with Gods mercy, that so many should be damned, so many bad, so few good, such have and hold about religions, all stiffe on their side, factious alike, thrive alike, and yet bitterly persecuting and damning each other;
The Anatomy of Melancholy: Member 2 Subsection 1 Religious Melancholy From Deficiency: Those…
p. 1017Some of those religions are so fanciful and extravagant, yet defended so fiercely with equal firmness and certainty, that they infer: if there are so many religious sects, each denied by the others, why may they not all be false? Why should one or another be preferred to the rest? The Sceptics press this argument; among others, Sextus Empiricus reaches this conclusion in book 8 of Against the Mathematicians.
After many philosophical arguments and reasons for and against the existence of gods, he concludes: since so many contend with one another, and so on, only one can be true, as Cicero likewise argues. Christians say that they alone worship the true God; they pity all other sects and lament their condition.
Yet those ancient Greeks and Romans who worshipped the Devil, as the Chinese do now, or local gods—their own gods—were much nobler, more high-spirited and victorious, with a more flourishing commonwealth, better cities, soldiers, scholars and minds: so Julian the Apostate, Caecilius in Minucius, Celsus and the philosopher Porphyry object, and Machiavelli maintains. Their gods often overcame our gods and performed as many miracles, and so on.
Saint Cyril, Arnobius, Minucius and many other ancient writers defend Christianity well, as more recently do Lessius, Duplessis-Mornay, Grotius in On the Truth of the Christian Religion, and Savonarola in On the Truth of the Christian Faith. Zanchi, Campanella, Marin Mersenne, Bozio and Gentillet answer all these atheistical arguments at length. But another difficulty troubles many people, as it did in ancient times: wicked people generally prosper; professed atheists prosper.
There are no gods, and heaven is empty, Selius declares; his proof is that he sees himself Made prosperous while denying these things.
There are no gods; the heavens are a fiction, Selius publicly maintains; For while he thus denies their divinity, He prospers all the more.
This is a principal argument: for the most part, the sincerest, most upright, honest and good people are brought low. The race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong (Ecclesiastes 9:11), nor bread to the wise, nor favour or riches to people of understanding; time and chance come to all.
There was a great plague at Athens, as Thucydides relates in book 2, during which everyone eventually acted with great licence, doing as he pleased without regard for divine or human laws. Neither fear of God nor human laws, he says, restrained anyone, because the plague carried off good and bad alike. They therefore concluded that worshipping or not worshipping the gods made no difference, since all perished alike.
Some raise objections and doubts about Scripture itself: it cannot accord with God’s mercy that so many should be damned, so many be bad and so few good; that there should be such contention over religions, all obstinate in their own cause, equally factional, equally prosperous, yet bitterly persecuting and condemning one another to damnation.
Socrates
Reading The Anatomy of Melancholy · Member 2 Subsection 1 Religious Melancholy From Deficiency: Those…
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.
Historical Text and Translation
The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.
Rights
Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.
- PDF editionComplete annotated edition — PDF
- EPUB editionComplete annotated edition — EPUB
- Word editionComplete annotated edition — Word
- Markdown editionComplete annotated edition — Markdown
- Principal historical witnessMcGill University Library — 1651 edition
- Supplied 1651 openingBavarian State Library — supplied opening
- Independent local comparison witnessIndependent 1651 microfilm — comparison opening