Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition
Swipe or use the arrow keys.
Modern English Page · Branch 549 of 1495
Member 2 Bodily Deformity, Sickness, Low Birth, and Particular Discontents
1651 English
317–318A most memorable observation, Scaliger accompts it, & non prætereundum, maximorum virorum plerosque, patres ignoratos, matres impudicas fuisse. I could recite a great catalogue of them, every kingdome, every province will yeeld innumerable examples: and why then should baseness of birth be objected to any man?
who thinks worse of Tully for being Arpinas, an upstart? Or Agathocles that Sicilian king for being a potters son? Iphicrates and Marius were meanly born. What wise man thinks better of any person for his nobility? as he said in Machiavel, omnes eodem patre nati, Adams sons, conceived all and born in sin, &c. We are by nature all as one, all alike, if you see us naked; let us wear theirs and they our clothes, and what’s the difference?
To speak truth as Bale did of P. Schalichius, I more esteem thy worth, learning, honesty, then thy nobility; honour thee more that thou art a writer, a Doctor of divinity, then Earl of the Hunnes, Baron of Skradine, or hast title to such and such provinces, &c.
Thou art more fortunate and great (so Jovius writes to Cosmus Medices then Duke of Florence) for thy vertues, then for thy lovely wife, and happy children, friends, fortunes, or great dutchy of Tuscany. So I accompt thee; and who doth not so indeed? Abdolominus was a gardner, and yet by Alexander for his vertues, made king of Syria.
How much better is it to be born of mean parentage, & to excell in worth, to be morally noble, which is preferred before that naturall nobility, by divines, philosophers, and politicians, to be learned, honest, discreet, well qualified, to be fit for any manner of imploiment, in country and common-wealth, war and peace, then to be Degeneres Neoptolemi, as many brave nobles are, only wise because rich, otherwise idiots, illiterate, unfit for any manner of service?
Udalricus Earl of Cilia upbraided John Huniades with the baseness of his birth, but he replied, in te Ciliensis Comitatus turpiter extinguitur, in me gloriose Bistricensis exoritur, thine Earldome is consumed with riot, mine begins with honor and renown.
Thou hast had so many noble ancestors; what is that to thee? Vix ea nostra voco, when thou art a disard thy self: quod prodest Pontice longo stemmate censeri? &c.
I conclude, hast thou a sound body, and a good soul, good bringing up? art thou vertuous, honest, learned, well qualified, religious, are thy conditions good? thou art a true nobleman, perfectly noble, although born of Thersites, —— dum modo tu sis —— Æacidæ similis, non natus, sed factus, noble κατ’ ἐξοχήν; for neither sword, nor fire, nor water, nor sickness, nor outward violence, nor the divel himself can take thy good parts from thee.
The Anatomy of Melancholy: Member 2 Bodily Deformity, Sickness, Low Birth, and Particular Discontents
p. 549Scaliger considers it a most memorable observation: “Nor should we pass over the fact that most of the greatest men had unknown fathers and unchaste mothers.” I could list a vast catalogue of them: every kingdom, every province will supply countless examples. Why, then, should anyone have his low birth held against him?
Who thinks worse of Cicero for being a man from Arpinum, an upstart? Or of Agathocles, that Sicilian king, for being a potter’s son? Iphicrates and Marius were of humble birth. What wise man thinks better of anyone because of his noble ancestry? As the speaker in Machiavelli said, “All born of the same father”: sons of Adam, all conceived and born in sin, and so on. By nature we are all one, all alike, if you see us naked. Let us wear their clothes and them ours, and what is the difference?
To speak the truth, as Bale did of P. Schalichius: I value your merit, learning, and integrity more than your nobility. I honour you more for being a writer and a doctor of divinity than for being Earl of the Huns, Baron of Skradine, or having a claim to this or that province, and so on.
You are more fortunate and greater for your virtues, so Giovio writes to Cosimo de’ Medici, then Duke of Florence, than for your lovely wife and fortunate children, your friends, your wealth, or your great duchy of Tuscany. That is how I judge you; and who, indeed, does not? Abdolominus was a gardener, yet Alexander made him king of Syria for his virtues.
How much better to be born of humble parents and excel in merit: to be morally noble, which theologians, philosophers, and political writers prefer to nobility by birth; to be learned, honest, judicious, and capable, fit for any employment in one’s country and commonwealth, in war and peace; than to be “degenerate Neoptolemuses,” as so many splendid nobles are, accounted wise only because they are rich, but otherwise fools, illiterate, and unfit for any service?
Ulrich, Earl of Cilia, reproached John Hunyadi with his low birth, but Hunyadi replied, “In you the earldom of Cilia dies shamefully; in me that of Bistritz rises gloriously”: your earldom is consumed by dissipation; mine begins with honour and renown.
You have had so many noble ancestors: what is that to you? “I can scarcely call those things our own,” when you yourself are a fool. “What good is it, Ponticus, to be reckoned by a long pedigree?” And so on.
I conclude: have you a sound body and a good soul, a good upbringing? Are you virtuous, honest, learned, capable, religious, and of good character? Then you are a true nobleman, perfectly noble, though born of Thersites, “provided that you yourself resemble the descendant of Aeacus”: not born noble, but made so, noble in the fullest sense. For neither sword, fire, water, sickness, outward violence, nor the devil himself can take your good qualities from you.
Socrates
Reading The Anatomy of Melancholy · Member 2 Bodily Deformity, Sickness, Low Birth, and Particular Discontents
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.
Historical Text and Translation
The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.
Rights
Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.
- PDF editionComplete annotated edition — PDF
- EPUB editionComplete annotated edition — EPUB
- Word editionComplete annotated edition — Word
- Markdown editionComplete annotated edition — Markdown
- Principal historical witnessMcGill University Library — 1651 edition
- Supplied 1651 openingBavarian State Library — supplied opening
- Independent local comparison witnessIndependent 1651 microfilm — comparison opening