Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition
Swipe or use the arrow keys.
1651 English Page · Branch 850 of 1495
By Counsel and Persuasion, the Foulness of the Deed, the Faults of Men And…
1651 English
558–559or in such a case as Brassivola the Physitian found Malatasta his patient, after a potion of Hellebor, which he had prescribed: Manibus in terram depositis, & ano versus cœlum elevato (ac si videretur Socraticus ille Aristophanes, qui Geometricas figuras in terram scribens, tubera colligere videbatur) atram bilem in album parietem injiciebat, adeoque totam cameram, & se deturpabat, ut, &c. all to bewrayed, or worse; if thou saw’st her (I say) wouldst thou affect her as thou dost?
Suppose thou beheldest her in a frosty morning, in cold weather, in some passion or perturbation of mind, weeping, chafing, &c. rivel’d and ill favoured to behold. She many times that in a composed look seems so amiable and delicious, tam scitula forma, if she do but laugh or smile, makes an ugly sparrow-mouthed face, and shews a pair of uneven, loathsom, rotten, foul teeth;
She hath a black skin, gouty legs, a deformed crooked carkass under a fine coat. It may be for all her costly tires she is bald, and though she seem so fair by dark, by candle light, or afar off at such a distance, as Callicratides observed in Lucian, If thou shouldst see her neer, or in a morning, she would appear more ugly then a beast. Si, diligenter consideres, quid per os & nares & cæteres corporis meatus egreditur, vilius sterquilinium nunquam vidisti.
Follow my counsell, see her undrest, see her, if it be possible, out of her attires, furtivis nudatam coloribus, it may be she is like Æsops Jay, or Plinies Cantharides, she will be loathsome, ridiculous, thou wilt not endure her sight: or suppose thou saw’st her sick, pale, in a consumption, on her death-bed, skin and bones, or now dead, Cujus erat gratissimus amplexus, as Barnard saith, erit horribilis aspectus;
Non redolet, sed olet, quæ redolere solet.As a posie, she smels sweet, is most fresh and fair one day, but dried up, withered, and stinks another. Beautifull Nireus, by that Homer so much admired, once dead, is more deformed then Thersites, and Solomon deceased as ugly as Marcolphus: thy lovely mistris, that was erst Charis charior ocellis, dearer to thee then thine eyes, once sick or departed, is
Vili vilior æstimata cœno,worse then any durt or dunghill. Her embraces were not so acceptable, as now her looks be terrible: thou hadst better behold a Gorgons head, then Helenas carkase.
Some are of opinion, that to see a woman naked is able of it self to alter his affection; and it is worthy of consideration, saith Montaigne the Frenchman in his Essaies, that the skilfullest masters of amorous dalliance, appoint for a remedy of venerous passions, a full survey of the body; which the Poet insinuates,
The Anatomy of Melancholy: By Counsel and Persuasion, the Foulness of the Deed, the Faults of Men And…
p. 850Or imagine her in the condition in which the physician Brasavola found his patient Malatasta after a dose of hellebore he had prescribed: “With his hands on the ground and his anus raised towards the sky—as though one were seeing that Socratic Aristophanes who, drawing geometrical figures on the ground, seemed to be gathering truffles—he squirted black bile onto a white wall, and so befouled the whole room and himself that,” and so forth. Utterly fouled, or worse: if you saw her like this, I say, would you love her as you do?
Suppose you saw her on a frosty morning, in cold weather, in some fit of passion or disturbance of mind, weeping or raging, wrinkled and ugly to look at. A woman who, with a composed expression, often seems so lovely and delightful, “so pretty in form,” may, merely by laughing or smiling, make an ugly sparrow-mouthed face and reveal uneven, loathsome, rotten, dirty teeth.
She has dark skin, gouty legs and a deformed, crooked body beneath a fine dress. Perhaps, for all her costly headdresses, she is bald; and although she seems so beautiful in darkness, by candlelight or at a distance, as Callicratidas observed in Lucian, “if you saw her close up or in the morning, she would seem uglier than a beast.” “If you carefully consider what comes out through the mouth, nostrils and other passages of the body, you have never seen a viler dunghill.”
Follow my advice: see her undressed; see her, if possible, without her finery, “stripped of her borrowed colours.” Perhaps she is like Aesop’s jay or Pliny’s blister beetles: she will be repulsive and ridiculous; you will not bear to look at her. Or imagine seeing her ill, pale, wasting away, on her deathbed, skin and bones, or already dead: “She whose embrace was most delightful,” as Bernard says, “will be horrible to look at.”
She who usually smells sweet now stinks, with no sweet scent.
Like a posy, she smells sweet and is fresh and beautiful one day, but dried up, withered and stinking another. Beautiful Nireus, so greatly admired by Homer, once dead is uglier than Thersites; and Solomon, dead, is as ugly as Marcolphus. Your lovely mistress, who was once “Charis, dearer than one’s eyes,” dearer to you than your own eyes, once ill or dead is
Judged fouler than foul mire,
worse than any dirt or dunghill. Her embraces were never so welcome as her appearance is now terrible. You would do better to look at a Gorgon’s head than at Helen’s corpse.
Some think that seeing a woman naked can itself change a man’s affection. It is worth considering, says the Frenchman Montaigne in his Essays, that the most skilful masters of amorous play prescribe a full view of the body as a remedy for sexual passions. The poet suggests as much:
Socrates
Reading The Anatomy of Melancholy · By Counsel and Persuasion, the Foulness of the Deed, the Faults of Men And…
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.
Historical Text and Translation
The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.
Rights
Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.
- PDF editionComplete annotated edition — PDF
- EPUB editionComplete annotated edition — EPUB
- Word editionComplete annotated edition — Word
- Markdown editionComplete annotated edition — Markdown
- Principal historical witnessMcGill University Library — 1651 edition
- Supplied 1651 openingBavarian State Library — supplied opening
- Independent local comparison witnessIndependent 1651 microfilm — comparison opening