Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition
Swipe or use the arrow keys.
1651 English Page · Branch 70 of 1495
Democritus Junior to the Reader
1651 English
41–42If he be in an heresie, or some perverse opinion, setled as some of our ignorant Papists are, convince his understanding, shew him the several follies, and absurd fopperies of that sect, force him to say, veris vincor, make it as clear as the Sun, he will erre still, peevish and obstinate as he is; and as he said si in hoc erro, libenter erro, nec hunc errorem auferri mihi volo; I will do as I have done, as my predecessors have done, and as my friends now do: I will dote for company.
Say now, are these men mad or no, Heus age responde? are they ridiculous? cedo quemvis arbitrum, are they sanæ mentis, sober, wise, and discreet? have they common sense? —— uter est insanior horum?
I am of Democritus opinion for my part, I hold them worthy to be laughed at; a company of brain-sick disards, as mad as Orestes and Athamas, that they may go ride the ass, & all sail along to the Anticyræ, in the ship of fools for company together. I need not much labor to prove this which I say otherwise then thus, make any solemn protestation, or swear, I think you will beleeve me without an oath; say at a word, are they fools? I refer it to you, though you be likewise fools and madmen your selves, and I as mad to ask the question; for what said our comical Mercurie? Justum ab injustis petere insipientia est. Ile stand to your censure yet, what think you?
But for as much as I undertook at first, that Kingdoms, Provinces, families, were melancholy as well as private men, I will examin them in particular, and that which I have hitherto dilated at random, in more general terms, I will particularly insist in, prove with more special and evident arguments, testimonies, illustrations, and that in brief. Nunc accipe quare desipiant omnes æque ac tu.
My first argument is borrowed from Solomon, an arrow drawn out of his sententious quiver, Pro. 3.7. Be not wise in thine own eyes. And 26.12. Seest thou a man wise in his own conceit? more hope is of a fool then of him. Isay pronounceth a woe against such men. cap. 5.21. that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight. For hence we may gather, that it is a great offence, and men are much deceived that think too well of themselves, an especial argument to convince them of folly.
Many men (saith Seneca) had been without question wise, had they not had an opinion that they had attained to perfection of knowledge already, even before they had gone half way, too forward, too ripe, præproperi, too quick and ready, cito prudentes, cito pii, cito mariti, cito patres, cito sacerdotes, cito omnis officii capaces & curiosi,
they had too good a conceipt of themselves, and that marred all; of their worth, valour, skil, art, learning, judgement, eloquence, their good parts; all their geese are swans, and that manifestly proves them to be no better then fools. In former times they had but seven wise men, now you can scarce finde so many fools.
The Anatomy of Melancholy: Democritus Junior to the Reader
p. 70If he is fixed in a heresy or some perverse opinion, as some of our ignorant Papists are, convince his understanding, show him that sect’s various follies and absurdities, force him to say “I am defeated by the truth,” make it as clear as the sun: he will persist in error, perverse and obstinate as ever. As the saying goes, “If I am mistaken in this, I am gladly mistaken, and I do not want this error taken from me.” I will do as I have done, as my predecessors did, and as my friends now do: I will be a fool for company.
Tell me now: are these men mad or not? “Come, answer!” Are they ridiculous? “Name any judge you like.” Are they “of sound mind,” sober, wise, and sensible? Have they common sense? Which of these is the madder?
For my part, I agree with Democritus: I think they deserve to be laughed at, a company of brain-sick fools, as mad as Orestes and Athamas. Let them ride the ass and all sail off together to the Anticyras in the ship of fools. I need take little further trouble to prove what I say, make no solemn declaration or swear to it; I think you will believe me without an oath. In a word, are they fools? I leave it to you, though you too are fools and madmen, and I am just as mad to ask. For what did Mercury say in the comedy? It is foolish to ask justice of the unjust. Still, I will accept your judgement: what do you think?
But since I undertook at the outset to show that kingdoms, provinces, and families were melancholy as well as individuals, I will examine them separately. What I have so far discussed at large, in general terms, I will now consider in detail and prove with more specific and evident arguments, testimonies, and illustrations—and do so briefly. Now hear why everyone is as foolish as you.
My first argument comes from Solomon, an arrow drawn from his quiver of maxims. Proverbs 3:7: “Do not be wise in your own eyes.” And 26:12: “Do you see a man wise in his own opinion? There is more hope for a fool than for him.” Isaiah pronounces woe upon such people, in 5:21: those “who are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight.” From this we may gather that self-conceit is a serious fault, and that people who think too well of themselves are badly deceived: a particularly strong argument for proving their folly.
Many people, says Seneca, would undoubtedly have been wise if they had not imagined they had already reached perfect knowledge before they were even halfway there. Too forward, too ripe, too hasty, too quick and ready: wise too soon, pious too soon, husbands too soon, fathers too soon, priests too soon, too soon qualified for every office and eager to undertake it.
They thought too highly of themselves—of their worth, courage, skill, expertise, learning, judgement, eloquence, and good qualities—and that ruined everything. All their geese are swans; this plainly proves that they are no better than fools. In former times there were only seven wise men; now you can scarcely find as many fools.
Socrates
Reading The Anatomy of Melancholy · Democritus Junior to the Reader
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.
Historical Text and Translation
The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.
Rights
Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.
- PDF editionComplete annotated edition — PDF
- EPUB editionComplete annotated edition — EPUB
- Word editionComplete annotated edition — Word
- Markdown editionComplete annotated edition — Markdown
- Principal historical witnessMcGill University Library — 1651 edition
- Supplied 1651 openingBavarian State Library — supplied opening
- Independent local comparison witnessIndependent 1651 microfilm — comparison opening