Diotimos Library · Journals, Notebooks & Fragments Collection · Parallel Edition
Swipe or use the arrow keys.
Modern English Page · Branch 630 of 1495
Subsection 2 Single Substances That Purge Melancholy Downwards
1651 English
379–380When that proud Menacrates, ὁ Ζεὺς, had writ an arrogant letter to Phil. of Macedon, he sent back no other answer but this, Consulo tibi ut ad Anticyram te conferas, noting thereby that he was crased, atque elleboro indigere, had much need of a good purge. Lilius Geraldus saith, that Hercules after all his mad pranks upon his wife and children, was perfectly cured by a purge of Hellebor, which an Anticyrian administred unto him.
They that were sound commonly took it to quicken their wits, (as Ennius of old, Qui non nisi potus ad arma—prosiluit dicenda; and as our Poets drink sack to improve their inventions I find it so registred by Agellius lib. 17. cap. 15.) Carneades the Academick when he was to write against Zeno the Stoick, purged himselfe with Hellebor first, which Petronius puts upon Chrysippus.
In such esteem it continued for many ages, till at length Mesue and some other Arabians began to reject and reprehend it, upon whose authority for many following lusters, it was much debated and quite out of request, held to be poyson and no medicine; and is still oppugned to this day by Crato and some Iunior Physitians.
Their reasons are, because Aristotle l. 1. de plant. c. 3. said, Henbane and Hellebor were poyson; and Alexander Aphrodiseus in the preface of his Problems, gave out, that (speaking of Hellebor) Quailes fed on that which was poyson to men. Galen l. 6. Epid. com. 5. Text. 35. confirms as much: Constantine the Emperour in his Geoponicks, attributes no other vertue to it, then to kill mice and rats, flies and mouldwarps, and so Mizaldus. Nicander of old, Gervinus, Skenkius, and some other Neotericks that have written of poysons, speak of Hellebor in a chief place.
Nicholas Leonicus hath a story of Solon, that besieging I know not what city, steeped Hellebor in a spring of water, which by pipes was conveyed into the middle of the town, and so either poysoned, or else made them so feeble and weak by purging, that they were not able to bear arms.
Notwithstanding all these cavils and objections, most of our late writers do much approve of it. Gariopontus lib. 1. cap. 13. Codronchus com. de helleb. Falopius lib. de med. purg. simpl. cap. 69. & consil. 15. Trincavelii, Montanus 239. Frisemelica consil. 14. Hercules de Saxonia, so that it be opportunely given. Iacobus de Dondis, Agg. Amatus, Lusit. cent. 66. Godef. Stegius cap. 13. Hollerius, and all our Herbalists subscribe.
The Anatomy of Melancholy: Subsection 2 Single Substances That Purge Melancholy Downwards
p. 630When that proud Menacrates, “Zeus,” wrote an arrogant letter to Philip of Macedon, Philip sent back only this reply: “I advise you to go to Anticyra.” He meant that Menacrates was out of his mind “and needed hellebore”: he badly needed a good purge. Lilius Giraldus says that Hercules, after all his mad assaults upon his wife and children, was completely cured by a purge of hellebore administered by a man of Anticyra.
People of sound mind commonly took it to sharpen their wits—as Ennius did long ago, “who never sprang to sing of arms unless he had been drinking,” and as our poets drink sack to improve their invention. I find it so recorded by Aulus Gellius, book 17, chapter 15. Carneades the Academic, when preparing to write against Zeno the Stoic, first purged himself with hellebore; Petronius attributes this to Chrysippus.
It remained highly esteemed for many ages, until Mesue and some other Arabian writers began to reject and condemn it. On their authority, for many succeeding periods of years it was hotly disputed and fell entirely out of favour, being regarded as poison rather than medicine. Crato and some more recent physicians still oppose it today.
Their reasons are that Aristotle, On Plants, book 1, chapter 3, called henbane and hellebore poisons; and Alexander of Aphrodisias, in the preface to his Problems, said, speaking of hellebore, that “quails feed on what is poisonous to men.” Galen, Epidemics, book 6, commentary 5, text 35, confirms this. Emperor Constantine, in his Geoponics, attributes no other virtue to it than killing mice, rats, flies and moles; Mizaldus does the same. Nicander in antiquity, and Gervinus, Skenkius and other recent writers on poisons, give hellebore a prominent place.
Nicholas Leonicus tells a story of Solon who, while besieging I do not know what city, steeped hellebore in a spring whose water was piped into the town’s centre. In this way he either poisoned the inhabitants or weakened them so much through purging that they could no longer bear arms.
Despite all these cavils and objections, most recent writers strongly approve of it: Gariopontus, book 1, chapter 13; Codronchus’ Commentary on Hellebore; Fallopius, On Simple Purgative Medicines, chapter 69; Trincavelli, consultation 15; Montanus, 239; Frisemelica, consultation 14; and Hercules de Saxonia, provided it is given at the right time. Jacobus de Dondis, Aggregator; Amatus Lusitanus, century 66; Godefridus Stegius, chapter 13; Hollerius and all our herbalists concur.
Socrates
Reading The Anatomy of Melancholy · Subsection 2 Single Substances That Purge Melancholy Downwards
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
Robert Burton’s Anatomy ranges across medicine, philosophy, poetry, religion, and everyday life in its inquiry into melancholy. This complete parallel edition pairs the 1651 English text with a close modern English rendering, preserving the three Partitions, Democritus Junior’s address to the reader, verse, and the historical index.
Historical Text and Translation
The historical text follows the sixth edition, printed at Oxford for Henry Cripps in 1651, using the McGill University Library copy. The supplied edition documents missing printed pages 98–99 supplied from another 1651 copy at the Bavarian State Library. Historical folio labels and their irregularities remain visible; web reader numbers identify reflowed passages and do not claim to reproduce PDF pagination.
About Diotimos Editions
Diotimos Editions prepared the close modern English rendering and editorial matter. All 8,755 original and modern passage pairs remain aligned, with verse breaks, italics, continuations, and linked annotations preserved. Burton’s 6,781 historical notes retain their attribution; 6,895 editorial notes remain distinct. The introduction, Note on the Text, contextual lexicon, indexes, source documentation, and bibliography are included. The engraved frontispiece remains available in the original downloads.
Rights
Burton’s historical text is in the public domain. The modern English rendering, introduction, notes, and editorial matter are © 2026 Diotimos Editions and appear with the site owner’s permission. The complete supplied PDF, EPUB, Word, and Markdown files remain available unchanged. The PDF and Word edition preserve the original parallel page layout.
- PDF editionComplete annotated edition — PDF
- EPUB editionComplete annotated edition — EPUB
- Word editionComplete annotated edition — Word
- Markdown editionComplete annotated edition — Markdown
- Principal historical witnessMcGill University Library — 1651 edition
- Supplied 1651 openingBavarian State Library — supplied opening
- Independent local comparison witnessIndependent 1651 microfilm — comparison opening