Diotimos Library · Esotericism & Spirituality Collection · Parallel Edition
Swipe or use the arrow keys.
English Introduction · Branch 182 of 194
Diotimos Contextual Lexicon · Part 2
Aphorismi Urbigerani: Diotimos Contextual Lexicon
p. 182Reflective possibility: One reflective use of imitation is to distinguish collaboration with a process from imposing a desired appearance. Teaching, cultivation and artistic practice all involve choosing conditions while responding to an activity with its own tendencies. This comparison offers no universal natural rule for human conduct. It asks what the practitioner must understand about the process being guided before claiming to have perfected it.
Read with the related interpretive essay and the next contextual entry.
Possibility and Encounter
Passage: “It has the power to produce either, according to the subject it encounters.” Read the complete passage.
Source forms: power to produce both; Subject.
Historical context: Undetermined matter is explained through a capacity to produce differing outcomes according to what it encounters. It is neither metal nor mineral in the particular distinction made here, although the opening places it in the mineral kingdom more broadly. The terminology should be read locally rather than forced into a single modern classification. The subject’s power is relational: its outcome is not described in isolation from the other subject.
Reflective possibility: A capacity may become visible only through an encounter. A question changes with its object, and an ability may develop differently under different demands. This does not mean that identity has no constraints. The passage can instead prompt attention to the conditions through which a possibility becomes actual, and to the responsibility involved in choosing those conditions rather than treating every outcome as inevitable.
Read with the related interpretive essay and the next contextual entry.
Living Gold and Common Gold
Passage: “This Green Dragon is the philosophers’ natural gold, exceedingly different from common gold.” Read the complete passage.
Source forms: natural Gold; vulgar.
Historical context: The author explicitly distinguishes the Dragon’s philosophical gold from common gold. Common gold is then called dead because its natural perfection has reached a terminus, whereas the other subject is credited with generative power. Living and dead thus name a place in the author’s account of generation, not simply whether something is an organism. The distinction also prevents every later occurrence of gold from being assigned the same referent.
Reflective possibility: Perfection can be imagined as finished achievement or as an active power to generate further life. Those ideals need not coincide. A reader might ask whether a valued accomplishment has become a possession to defend or a capacity through which something new can arise. This is an editorial meditation on the passage’s generative contrast, not a claim that its two kinds of gold are only psychological states.
Read with the related interpretive essay and the next contextual entry.
The Way of the Poor
Passage: “Since this first chaos may be obtained without expense, costing only the trouble of digging it from the mines, this is appropriately called the sole way of the poor.” Read the complete passage.
Source forms: without any Expence; Poor.
Historical context: The first way is assigned a low material cost because its initial chaos is said to be available for the labour of mining. The same aphorism requires knowledge of extraction through the universal menstruum. Poverty of expense therefore does not mean absence of work or specialised understanding. Later claims about fuel, vessels and instruments further qualify the economy of the undertaking. The title belongs to an argument about access to a specific route.
Reflective possibility: A useful distinction can be drawn between what costs money and what demands attention, labour or knowledge. Expensive equipment does not necessarily supply understanding, while a modest beginning can still require sustained work. The reflective question is how resources support an undertaking and what they cannot replace. The historical author’s assurance of cheapness remains his own claim, rather than a guarantee for the reader.
Read with the related interpretive essay and the next contextual entry.
Homogeneous and Heterogeneous
Passage: “This feminine subject cannot be brought back unless she is first activated by her homogeneous qualities to free her from impurities and heterogeneous qualities, so that she may be better able to receive the spiritual love of our Green Dragon.” Read the complete passage.
Source forms: Heterogeneous; Homogeneous.
Historical context: The sentence gives activation by homogeneous qualities a role in freeing the feminine subject from impurities and heterogeneous qualities. Its purpose is to make her capable of a specified conjunction. Similarity and difference are consequently judged in relation to an intended process; the terms do not establish a general moral opposition between sameness and otherness. The female subject and Dragon retain their particular roles within the second way.
Socrates
Reading Aphorismi Urbigerani · Diotimos Contextual Lexicon · Diotimos Contextual Lexicon · Part 2
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
The complete 1690 Aphorismi Urbigerani: historical frontispiece and Latin inscriptions, title and licence, dedication, all 101 grand-elixir aphorisms, the complete Circulatum Minus with its title, address and 31 vegetable aphorisms, and the full explanatory postscript with both printed endings. Original and modern English readings, fresh Latin translations, 115 annotations and the complete supplied Diotimos study apparatus.
Historical Text and Translation
Baro Urbigerus, Aphorismi Urbigerani, London: Henry Faithorne, 1690; with Circulatum Minus Urbigeranum and the concluding postscript. The Getty Research Institute copy supplies the governing images; EEBO-TCP A25684 supplies the structured transcription witness, corrected against those images. The frontispiece signed W. F. is attributed in library catalogues to William Faithorne.
About Diotimos Editions
This historical edition credits Diotimos Editions as its English translator.
Rights
The historical text and engraving are public domain. The EEBO-TCP Phase 2 transcription is released under CC0; that waiver does not cover associated images. The engraving is credited to the Getty Research Institute copy digitised by Internet Archive. The supplied 2026 reading, translations and Diotimos editorial material are published with the site owner’s authorization.
- Governing image witness and historical engravingGetty Research Institute: governing 1690 copy
- Historical textual witness checked against native imagesEEBO-TCP: structured 1690 transcription witness
- Complete original supplied fileDownload the supplied PDF edition
- Complete original supplied fileDownload the supplied EPUB edition
- Complete original supplied fileDownload the supplied Word edition
- Complete original supplied fileDownload the supplied Markdown edition