Diotimos Library · Esotericism & Spirituality Collection · Parallel Edition
Swipe or use the arrow keys.
English Introduction · Branch 181 of 194
Diotimos Contextual Lexicon · Part 1
Aphorismi Urbigerani: Diotimos Contextual Lexicon
p. 181Diotimos Contextual Lexicon
These twenty-four entries begin with one complete sentence from the modern reading and two literal forms from the historical wording. Historical context explains the passage’s local work. Reflective possibility marks a present editorial application, distinct from a claim about the original author’s exclusive intention. Passage links preserve access to the complete argument.
First Matter: Capacity Before Completion
Passage: “Hermetic science consists solely in the correct knowledge of the philosophers’ first matter, which belongs to the mineral kingdom and has not yet been determined by Nature.” Read the complete passage.
Source forms: first Matter; Mineral Kingdom.
Historical context: The initial definition makes knowledge of the subject the beginning of the art. Its place in the mineral kingdom is affirmed, while determination is withheld. The following exclusions prevent that openness from meaning simply any substance whatever. The author is defining a capacity within his philosophy of nature, not reporting that he lacks a name for an ordinary specimen. Read the opening alongside the later distinction between finished metals and a subject capable of more than one outcome.
Reflective possibility: A present reader might distinguish a capacity from its first achieved form. A skill, relationship or inquiry can acquire a definite expression without exhausting everything it could become. That comparison does not identify Urbigerus’s matter with the human mind. It offers a question suggested by his distinction: which forms make a possibility available, and which are prematurely treated as its final limit?
Read with the related interpretive essay and the next contextual entry.
Availability and Recognition
Passage: “It can be found everywhere, at all times, and only through our science.” Read the complete passage.
Source forms: every where; our Science.
Historical context: The author denies restrictions of place, season and magical attraction. Yet he retains a strong condition: the matter is found only through the relevant science. Physical availability and knowledgeable recognition are therefore different claims. The appeal to Hermes supports the assertion from within a tradition of authority; it does not independently locate the subject for the present reader. This tension between an accessible world and a restricted art runs through the promise of plainly written rules.
Reflective possibility: Something can be close at hand while remaining difficult to recognise. Familiar experience becomes intelligible through learned distinctions, patient observation and an ability to ask useful questions. The reflective task is not to assume that everything nearby conceals a secret. It is to notice how a way of attending can reveal what habitual categories have passed over, and to remain willing to test that new recognition.
Read with the related interpretive essay and the next contextual entry.
Transformation and Continuity
Passage: “Ours truly transfigure our subject while preserving its nature, quality, and property.” Read the complete passage.
Source forms: transfigure; conserving.
Historical context: This sentence states the author’s difference between his art and the practices he dismisses as disguises. Genuine change is said to conserve nature, quality and property. The conjunction is deliberate, although its success is asserted rather than demonstrated by the sentence. The possessive ours also warns that familiar operation names may carry special meanings in this account. A modern reading should preserve this criterion before deciding how convincingly any later passage fulfils it.
Reflective possibility: Change need not be judged only by visible novelty. A reader can ask whether a transformation strengthens the capacities through which a person or practice remains recognisable. The analogy leaves room for real alteration and for criticism: claims to preserve an essence can conceal either resistance to necessary change or a superficial change of appearance. Continuity becomes a question to examine, rather than a reassuring label.
Read with the related interpretive essay and the next contextual entry.
Art as an Imitation of Nature
Passage: “After our subject has passed through all these artificial operations, which always imitate Nature, it is called the Philosophers’ Stone, or the fifth essence of metals, because it is compounded from the essence of their four elements.” Read the complete passage.
Source forms: imitate Nature; fifth Essence.
Historical context: Artifice here means an intentional preparation, not automatically a falsification. The operations are said to imitate nature, and their completed subject is described through a fifth essence compounded from four elemental essences. These are historical explanatory categories. Replacing the elements with modern chemical elements would change the claim. The important relation in this sentence is between deliberate work, natural generation and a completion that gathers constituent powers into another condition.
Socrates
Reading Aphorismi Urbigerani · Diotimos Contextual Lexicon · Diotimos Contextual Lexicon · Part 1
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
The complete 1690 Aphorismi Urbigerani: historical frontispiece and Latin inscriptions, title and licence, dedication, all 101 grand-elixir aphorisms, the complete Circulatum Minus with its title, address and 31 vegetable aphorisms, and the full explanatory postscript with both printed endings. Original and modern English readings, fresh Latin translations, 115 annotations and the complete supplied Diotimos study apparatus.
Historical Text and Translation
Baro Urbigerus, Aphorismi Urbigerani, London: Henry Faithorne, 1690; with Circulatum Minus Urbigeranum and the concluding postscript. The Getty Research Institute copy supplies the governing images; EEBO-TCP A25684 supplies the structured transcription witness, corrected against those images. The frontispiece signed W. F. is attributed in library catalogues to William Faithorne.
About Diotimos Editions
This historical edition credits Diotimos Editions as its English translator.
Rights
The historical text and engraving are public domain. The EEBO-TCP Phase 2 transcription is released under CC0; that waiver does not cover associated images. The engraving is credited to the Getty Research Institute copy digitised by Internet Archive. The supplied 2026 reading, translations and Diotimos editorial material are published with the site owner’s authorization.
- Governing image witness and historical engravingGetty Research Institute: governing 1690 copy
- Historical textual witness checked against native imagesEEBO-TCP: structured 1690 transcription witness
- Complete original supplied fileDownload the supplied PDF edition
- Complete original supplied fileDownload the supplied EPUB edition
- Complete original supplied fileDownload the supplied Word edition
- Complete original supplied fileDownload the supplied Markdown edition