Diotimos Library · Esotericism & Spirituality Collection · Bilingual Edition
Swipe or use the arrow keys.
Latin Page · Branch 154 of 204
Sulphur · The Three Principles · Passage 15
Source reference
- Latin witness
- 1616 · sequence pages 56–57; 57 printed 47
Latin
Concludimus itaque non esse nisi unicam naturam, tam in metallis quam in aliis rebus, sed diversam eius operationem, unam etiam universalem materiam secundum Hermetem: sic ab hac una re omnes res natae fiunt. Multi tamen sunt artifices, quorum quilibet sequitur suum cerebrum; quaerunt novam naturam, novam materiam, propterea etiam inveniunt novum recensque nihil, quia non ad possibilitatem naturae sed ad syllabas scripta Philosophorum interpretantur. Sed hi omnes sunt ex illis comitiis, de quibus in Dialogo Mercurii cum Alchimista scriptum est, qui sine conclusione domum redeunt; non solum absque medio, verum et sine principio finem quaerunt, et hoc inde fit quod non ex fundamentis vel lectione librorum Philosophorum, sed ex auditu et receptis circuforaneis artem assequi conantur; licet iam libri Philosophorum ab invidis fortasse desolati sunt, in multis locis addunt vel supprimunt; postea cum illis non succedit, ad Sophisticationes convertuntur, et tentant mira opera vana, dealbando, rubificando, lunam fixando, animam auri extrahendo, quod in Praefatione libelli 12 Tractatuum hoc fieri posse satis negatum est. Non quidem negamus, imo omnino esse necessarium dicimus, animam metallicam extrahi debere, sed non ad Sophisticam operationem, sed ad opus Philosophorum; qua extracta et purgata, iterum corpori suo reddi debet, ut fiat resurrectio vera corporis glorificati. Nunquam hoc nostrum propositum fuit, sine grano tritici triticum multiplicare posse, sed ut illa anima extracta aliquod aliud metallum Sophistico modo tingere possit, falsissimum esse scias, omnesque qui de hoc gloriantur falsarios esse; sed ista in tertio principio de Sale copiosius, cum hic non est locus extendere calamum.
English
I therefore conclude that there is only one nature in metals as in other things, though her operation varies. There is also one universal matter, according to Hermes: thus all things are born from this one thing. Yet many artists each follow their own fancy. They seek a new nature and a new matter, and therefore discover a new and freshly made nothing. They interpret philosophers by written syllables rather than by nature's possibilities.
All these belong to the assembly described in the Dialogue of Mercury with the Alchemist, who return home without a conclusion. They seek an end not merely without a middle but without a beginning. This happens because they try to attain the art from hearsay and quacks' recipes, rather than from foundations or reading philosophers' books—although envious people have perhaps already laid waste those books, adding or suppressing material in many places. Afterwards, when they do not succeed, they turn to sophistications and attempt marvellous but vain works: whitening, reddening, fixing silver and extracting gold's soul. The possibility of doing this was sufficiently denied in the preface to the little book of Twelve Treatises. I do not deny—indeed, I say it is altogether necessary—that the metallic soul must be extracted. But it must be for the philosophers' work, rather than a sophistical operation. Once extracted and purified, it must be returned to its own body, so that a true resurrection of the glorified body occurs. It has never been my contention that wheat can be multiplied without a grain of wheat. But know it to be utterly false that the extracted soul can tinge some other metal by a sophistical method; everyone who boasts of this is a falsifier. These things will be treated more fully under salt, the third principle. Here there is no place to write at length.
Socrates
Reading A New Light of Alchemy · Sulphur · The Three Principles · Sulphur · The Three Principles · Passage 15
Ask about a concept, passage, contradiction, or connection.
Socrates will begin with this book and its sources.About This Reading Edition
The complete supplied Latin–English edition of the Twelve Treatises, Epilogue, Enigma, Parable, Dialogue of Mercury and Treatise of Sulphur, with original preliminaries, John French’s historical English address and its separately labelled modernisation, 101 annotations and the complete study apparatus.
Historical Text and Translation
The Twelve Treatises and their concluding texts follow the selected 1606 Herzog August Bibliothek witness. The Dialogue uses the 1607 Cologne printing; the author’s preface and Alsted epigram use Frankfurt 1611. Sulphur uses the 1616 Munich and Rome witnesses. John French’s 1650 address is separately identified as historical English reception.
About Diotimos Editions
This historical edition credits Diotimos Editions as its English translator.
Rights
The historical Latin texts and John French’s 1650 English address are in the public domain. The new translation, modernisation and editorial apparatus were prepared with AI assistance for Diotimos Editions in 2026 and are published with the site owner’s authorization.