Tap the page, move to the top or bottom edge, swipe down, or press Tab to reveal reading controls. Use the arrow keys or swipe sideways to turn pages.

← ExitA Chymical Dictionary
Homunculus

Homunculus

Body disease and historical medicine · A Chymical Dictionary

At a Glance

The word. An artificial human being, with an additional image sense.

In the book. In the 1650 compilation, “the preceding treatise” is the separately titled Of the Nature of Things.

A place to read. The historical definition below, 1650 dictionary, unnumbered definition page 25; facsimile PDF page 353.

Historical Definition

Homunculus, in Paracelsus, is an artificially made human being, whose process is described at length on page eight of the preceding treatise; sometimes the term means superstitious images.

Meaning

The definition gives two distinct uses. The first is an artificially made human being and includes a reference to an earlier text. The second concerns superstitious images. A modern reader who takes the word only as a name for a small human form will miss the compiler’s actual distinctions of origin and use.

“Artificially made” is the historical claim. The dictionary does not present evidence that such a being was successfully produced, nor does this short entry itself give the process. It sends the reader elsewhere. The reference is consequently a bibliographical feature as well as part of the definition.

The image sense is explicitly qualified as superstitious. That judgement belongs to the compiler’s vocabulary of evaluated practices, much as Exorcista and Græca Magia receive disapproving classifications. It should not be extended into a judgement about every image or every artificial object discussed in the dictionary.

Use in the Book

In the 1650 compilation, “the preceding treatise” is the separately titled Of the Nature of Things. Its first book discusses generation, and the reference to page eight leads to the artificial-human passage there. The dictionary was originally printed after that work, so the pointer made sense within the bound compilation. In a standalone edition it needs this explanation, because the preceding pages no longer contain the treatise.

That placement does not make the entire compilation a single work by Sendivogius. The dictionary belongs to the lexicographical material based on Dorn, while Of the Nature of Things was printed under Paracelsus’s name. Modern research treats that Paracelsian work as a composite text of disputed authenticity. The reference should therefore be described as a pointer to a work attributed to Paracelsus, rather than independent proof that Paracelsus personally composed every part of it.

The dictionary’s related beings remain distinct. Gnomi are described through several formulations, including corporeal spirits living under the earth and Pygmies a cubit long. Inanimati is directly glossed as Pygmies. Gigantes are human beings exceeding the bounds of Nature. None of those definitions says, merely by resemblance of form or size, that its subject has the artificial origin claimed under Homunculus.

This distinction is especially useful in reading a historical account that moves between a story of generation, a class of spirits and a manufactured image. The dictionary does not warrant substituting one for all the others.

Places to Read

Exorcista. A practitioner of spirit-calling, condemned as superstitious by the dictionary.

Gigantes. Human figures described as exceeding natural bounds.

Gnomi. Subterranean beings described through several related formulations.

In This Edition

The modernised definition retains both meanings and preserves the original page reference while identifying its destination in the commentary. This keeps the historical text complete without reproducing a practical process inside the new explanatory entry.

The commentary treats the passage as evidence for a historical claim and for the transmission of a name. It does not invent a successful experiment, supply missing stages or treat the attributed process as a demonstrated account of human generation. The important editorial task is to make the reference, the two senses and the limits of the attribution visible.

Historical source: 1650 dictionary, unnumbered definition page 25; facsimile PDF page 353 — Facsimile

Sources. Of the Nature of Things, first book, in the 1650 compilation, Book I, printed page 8; the artificial-human discussion; Urs Leo Gantenbein, Real or Fake? New Light on the Paracelsian De natura rerum (2020), Research abstract on the text’s composite and disputed authorship

See also. Exorcista; Gigantes; Gnomi; Græca Magia; Inanimati

Contents

Sign in to save your reading →